So which statement is true? If Aaron deserved the award hands down how can Tom Brady be better?
Printable View
I have your new avatar Woody:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B82FaBLIYAEo3zB.jpg:large
:)
Hands down?? Are you kidding?? Brady is better than Rodgers, period. More to being a great qb than throwing a nice ball. Brady is as clutch as it gets.. Four game winning drives in the SuperBowl..
The defense basically gift wrapped a packers win against Seattle and he couldn't even sustain a drive less enough come from behind by ten points. No one in their right mind would put rodgers over Brady. Not just all time but right now.
Call me a homer but I'll take a healthy Rodgers over the current Brady. Brady really struggles with pressure in his face (the end zone pick was horrific) and can't escape like Rodgers can. What was the stat they said last night, Brady was something like 1/23 on passes >20+ yards in his SB career? You can't only compare the NFCCG vs the SB. Brady had the benefit of health, a neutral site, and a Seattle defense missing their nickelback for almost the entire game and Avril for the majority of the second half.
A healthy Aaron Rodgers.
Isn't this the same Aaron Rodgers that injured himself falling off the end of the bench?
If it walks like a Homer and it talks like a Homer:
It's likely a Homer.
I have a system for Packerrat HOMERS. 'YOU' don't grade out at four stars.
Only one Packerrat deserves that distinction?
I think Leonard's a section 8.
Should I have inserted the word 'otherwise' between the second and third sentence for more clarity?
I'll try this:
The last two weeks it was:
It's "well ...Aaron Rodgers would have been terrific if he was healthy in Seattle".
Today it's .... "Aaron Rodgers physical skill set is 'much better' than Tom Brady's."
Tom 'is still terrific' Brady just won his FOURTH SUPER BOWL RING.
I'm not going way out on a limb here and I'm sorry if it's shocking:
Aaron Rodgers with Mike McCarthy as his head Coach will not win four Super Bowl Rings.
No. Rodgers is the second best qb in the league. Rodgers had better stats than Brady but being great is not just about stats. Brady is number one, this is not even a debate. Its really not. No one leads a team/offense better, no one wants to win more than him, and no one is more clutch. Those attributes are clearly superior to Rodgers. What he did in the fourth quarter is legendary. What do you think the score of that game would have been had the Pats been given 5 turnovers?
Saying Brady is better is not an insult to Rodgers. I think he's the second best QB in the league. With the game on the line, in the biggest stage, with everything on the line, I would be lying if I said I want Rodgers over Brady. Brady won four superbowls with game winning drives, would have 6 if not for a few plays, has been to 9 AFC championship games (almost every year), and lets not forget he's 37. Brady >> Rodgers.