Favored by 9? I'd bet on the Vikings to cover that. Nothing has come easy for the Packers this season and I don't like the matchup.
Edit: apparently Chewy says we'll win by 30+
Printable View
Favored by 9? I'd bet on the Vikings to cover that. Nothing has come easy for the Packers this season and I don't like the matchup.
Edit: apparently Chewy says we'll win by 30+
I totally agree, it's either going to be close or it's going to be a blowout.Quote:
Originally Posted by 3irty1
Yeah. I'd even wager that the Packers will either win or lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by hoosier
God lets hope so. Ties are like kissing your sister.Quote:
Originally Posted by channtheman
Was it the Viqueens we tied last year?Quote:
Originally Posted by 3irty1
YupQuote:
Originally Posted by channtheman
The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.
As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.
I think the Packers win this fairly easily only because I think Ponder will start. Stubby supposedly has said this week that he needs to start using Starks more. We will see about that, he will probably stick with his predictable game plans until the day he's fired.
Packer Report @PackerReport 2h2 hours ago
For #Vikings vs. #Packers, Greenway and Rudolph are out. Bridgewater was limited participation and is questionable.
You're gettin' on the fightin' side of me if you're dissing the Musky Queen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig
Ryan Wood @ByRyanWood 3h3 hours ago
#Packers injury report:
Barrington doubtful
Boyd doubtful
Boykin out
Jones probable
Lang (no injury)probable
Matthews probable
Neal probable
That means Pennell and Janis will probably be activated again.Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmax
Interesting insight. Any thoughts on whether Tolzien will be active?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
I'm sorry, that was unnecessary roughness against a senior citizen.
Stubby made a statement today that Boykin's injury is worse than they originally thought.
http://muskywarrior.org/wp-content/u...ontario-57.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Joemailman
60 pounder!! Nice fish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wist43
I hope they keep reeling like this. 550+ yards of offense last game. As for Bridgewater. they are playing the gametime decision but I think they forgot to tell Teddy to play along. He talked about how much fun it will be to play tomorrow in such a historic stadium. Sure didn't sound like an "if I play". I suppose that in itself could be a ruse.
Are you feeling ok? You almost sound......... Optimistic?Quote:
Originally Posted by wist43
I grade on a different scale of the rest of you guys I guess... I fully expect we should beat a lesser team like the Vikings - no offense Rastak ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by George Cumby
If Bridgewater plays?? He's a rookie, i.e. he'll be big-time up and down... long term he may be the answer for the Vikes, but this season is going to be a big learning curve; and if Ponder starts - Ponder is Ponder.
We got waxed by 2 teams that I consider to be better than us - Seattle and Detroit; and we beat a bad Jets team, and looked terrible on defense beating an about even team in the Bears.
If Peterson were playing?? I don't think the line would be 9, and I don't think we'd cover 9, but given the circumstances - yes, we should cover. Even with dunderdummy preening his spraypainted hair in the coaches booth ;)
That's a 15 yard penalty, whippersnapper.Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby