I think Walford in the 3rd, or even in the 2nd is a better value than Williams in the 1st.
Printable View
I think Walford in the 3rd, or even in the 2nd is a better value than Williams in the 1st.
"Value" is a concept that mystifies me. If Williams turns out to be an All-Pro, and Walford turns out to be Quarless II, who cares about a "value pick"? Aren't you looking for guys who can play? I mean, if you could go back and re-draft, Donald Driver would've been a first or second round pick, and would've been a great "value" there.
Yeah, decreased risk means increased cost. Walford has more risk. Ergo, he is cheaper than Williams. All *seemingly*, mind you.
Cornerback, Utah.