Quote:
Originally Posted by MJZiggy
Patler, are you sure that's not the very thing she's suggesting?
She suggested a need for limitations, cited existing language in the constitution for support, and offered an interpretation of that language. That leads me to the conclusion that she is looking for a fast resolution via legislation or judicial interpretation based on the existing language, not an Amendment. I recognize that she may be unwilling to admit that now, or that I may have been wrong in my conclusion. However, if I am wrong in my conclusion, and she really does favor an Amendment, in my opinion there is an analytic disconnect in her arguments in this thread.