MMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm......Sideline Hostessss.........
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tXnRqvqZou..._simpson31.jpghttp://content.costco.com/Images/Con...uct/30465b.jpg
Printable View
MMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm......Sideline Hostessss.........
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tXnRqvqZou..._simpson31.jpghttp://content.costco.com/Images/Con...uct/30465b.jpg
I can't believe she was just grabbing for attention; she made no public statement until this interview. I find it interesting that a women, who has to suffer the x-rated advances of a football star, is now being viewed as anything but a victim. Kinda like saying "she was begging to be raped the way she was dressed" in other times.
Ok. You can use your second paragraph to answer the question in the first. She didn't think she was being harassed and didn't file suit. She didn't get the attorney until the NFL asked to speak with her.
From what I've read, it got into the media because the reporter who broke is (or maybe was) a friend that saw the images.
I don't know about her, but I often save messages that people send me if they're extraordinary. I don't necessarily save the ones I send, but if you listen to the voicemail, you get a pretty good understanding of what her message to him was.
As to her career path, the teams and owners are fighting over a 9 Billion dollar pot and what to do with it when it gets bigger. The Cowboys hire chicks to hang out on the mezzanine and dance. I'm sure that sideline hostesses still exist and sideline reporters most certainly do. The staff are furloughed because there's a lockout, not because the league is suffering to pay its bills. Have you watched local newcasts these days? Mediocre is being generous. There is plenty of employed mediocrity in the world. I don't think she views herself as the second coming of Liz. I think you're projecting that onto her. Like a lot of other folks are doing. And that's the whole point. She didn't start this. She didn't release the photos. She didn't comment on them. She didn't sue (that was the masseuses). Her only point was that she wants to be doing what she has been doing and she can't because of this whole mess. What expectations has she expressed that are out of line with what she's been doing?
i'm with zig and tar. to me everything that she's done is/was on the up and up...unlike what's his name.
I was hoping this could morph into Brett "the living legend" Michaels thread... I mean, there ARE other LEGENDS named "Brett" dontcha know.... but then again, I'm the resident "outsider ", the "short bus" rider... the local nuisance... ***donning bandana, lip gloss, greasy hair extensions and spraying body with RAID*** ***ewwwww***
November 2nd, 2010
Who is "Reese"? - Sterger's spokesman.Quote:
Sterger has not decided whether she will file a lawsuit against Favre, the Jets or the NFL, but she is "considering all her options," Reese said.
"She could file a lawsuit - that's one option. Another option is that she does nothing," Reese said.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010...er-brett-favre
Next question?
Can I hire her ??????
Come on RG. We're all entitled to our opinions. We are all privvy to the same "facts" as divulged by media sources and we interpret those "facts" to form our opinions based on our experiences in life. We "bother", because that's what this forum is here for; to express our opinions and debate them. You've done a good job of presenting your case and why you interpret the scenario the way you do. I think Zig has, also. That's why we're here, isn't it?
How is a spokesman saying she hasn't decided and is weighing her options a threat? Might she have been asked if she'll sue? He said she could. Or she could not. That's not a threat. It's the perfect answer from a spokesperson. And if I were in the middle of a mess like this one, I'd damn sure want someone else doing the commenting. Next question: did she sue?