http://www.startribune.com/sports/70504472.html
Good clip...."I'm just thinking out loud" lol :D
Printable View
http://www.startribune.com/sports/70504472.html
Good clip...."I'm just thinking out loud" lol :D
Nice vid but why not put it in the "Brett the fucking Viking" thread? In fact why not all these other dorky Brett threads as well?Quote:
Originally Posted by gex
Sweet donkey fuck.....why not just start a Viking section to the forum? That would give us a place to put gems like "The Power of the Mullet".
LOL...i was certainly shocked to log on only to see several favre threads on page 1... :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak Out
http://www.terminally-incoherent.com...5/facepalm.jpg
(while the link is still in my clipboard)
I agree with Freak Out. This is getting out of hand. Favre is a Viking...he has his OWN thread...leave it there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!
Quite honestly I could give 2 shits about any Viking. Lets nuke their threads all together. Or maybe we should start a Jay Cutler Only thread and a Matt Stafford Only thread.
How about we talk about the Packers instead? This is after all a Packer message board.
Stop whining. As if we're going to stop talking about Favre - ever. Or other players and teams that impact the Packers - or not. People just need to have thicker skin. Insult me - I can take it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zool
You guys are being outrageous. If Favre stuff is not allowed, then any player not on the Packers should not be allowed. Whether you like it or not, Brett Favre is the biggest thing to come through GB in a long, long, long time and will be a huge part of their history. There is absolutely nothing wrong with posting this vid.
we went thru this before. The Favre thread was created for all favre related shit.
Favre is Viking. This isn't a sports forum. It is a Packer forum. Shit has no place here, cept for the Favre thread.
What about all of your ramblings about Ruvell Martin, another ex-Packer?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
http://www.eteamz.com/LibertyvilleLa...all.swish2.jpg
The fact of the matter is this: The thread was clearly labeled and you know what it was going to be about, yet you guys came in to "bump" it up instead of letting it die. If you had a problem with it, simply do not post in it. Is that really so hard?
Saying you can have threads about one player but not another sets a really ugly precedent and its not something I'm interested in being a part of. Where does the censorship stop, in that case? This forum was founded under a set of core beliefs. Start living them and stop bitching.
It's not like you didn't know what you were getting into. You made the decision to open the thread and make a comment about it. Take some personal accountability instead of trying to take away from others enjoyment.
Dipshit. That was ONE thread..just as there is already ONE thread about Bert. What point don't you get. Man, you are slow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Partial
You are honestly trying to compare one thread about a recent departure in RM to multiple threads about Bert? LOL
Nobody is censoring anything. There is a Bert thread. Post bert related shit in that thread.
If you arent' interested in being a part of that..then go. No one is begging you to stay.
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#471801Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#469012
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#450743
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#450672
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=martin#445473
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#473145
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#468452
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#466089
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#462189
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#461094
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#455075
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#454214
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#453408
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#453121
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450743
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450696
http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/vi...=ruvell#450312
I could continue, but why bother? One thread? You're a bloody hypocrite. Bohica, brother
Partial vs. Ty. Is there any peace in Packer Nation?
Wow. You really are a moron. How many of those were Ruvell Martin threads?Quote:
Originally Posted by Partial
Your first link is to ANOTHER Bert thread. Talk about making our point for us. Another Bert thread in the packer forum.
The issue is THREADS started, not occasionally bringing up his name.
2nd link is about Jake Allen. Hmm. Wonder why RM would be mentioned. And, what is funny is you are so stupid. Ty didn't bring up his name...and was positive about him. LOL
Third link. Add any player from any team. Again, one can mention Bert or Ruvell. Wow. you are kinda dumb.
4th. YOU made ruvell the issue. The issue was about your opinions. You "bumped" a thread to make yourself look smart. Harv asked if we should bump old threads of yours where you were wrong.
Ty used your "gushing" over ruvell as an example. There was no talk about him. My god, it might help if you actually read the posts before you tried to use them to support your foolishness.
5th link. Ty responded to your QUOTE about MM and cutting RM. And, didn't even use RM in my post. My point was about MM. Sheesh. You are really a maroon.
6th link. In the badger forum. You opine on the talent level. ty notes your ability to judge talent isn't good based on Money Morency and RM. See, that is called relevance. The issue is your ability..thus we need some examples of your ability.
I'm not going to continue, as i can tell it will be more of this type of stupidity.
Aren't you leaving?
You will notice that Ty's original post was no different than several others, nor did it address anyone specifically.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeLH2006
You will notice that Partial didn't address anyone specifically...until my post.
Draw your own conclusion.
Is there even a Packer board anymore on here? Seems like Vikings central lately...Thank god the Bears suck or we'd have to deal with the Bear fans, too. :lol:
I knew I'd get partial fired up with the Mullet comment. :)
can we just do a nice little ban sweep and get rid of the jackasses please?
really... it's a packers forum... we go over this every time and we hear the same arguments every time that get owned and we never hear from partial again (until the next thread comes up so he can act like he never got owned in the first place).
the whole semantic / logic thing of "well then we cant talk about any other player" is ridiculous ... how bout i dont want to come here and see a fucking youtube video of favre saying this or that... how hard is that to understand you dickweeds?
I, for one, can do without the snarkiness about Favre threads and the addition of Favre threads. Keep it one area, PERIOD.
I know he is revered by a lot of fellow 'Rats, but let it freakin' go! Your admiration about him isn't going to bring him back. The vitriol spewed by those on the opposite side is turning a lot of us off as well.
Best thing to do, is not have all these extra BF threads. I respectfully ask Admin to please get this resolved.
It's one of the reasons, I have avoided posting as much as I had in the past.
I don't want to see any more Star-Trib or PioneerPress about the Vikings' players, which Favre is (for better or worse).
</rant>
Dude, read my post. Was Brett Favre not a huge point of Packer history? It's a fair point to say that if Favre discussion is not allowed, then no non-Packer discussion would be allowed.Quote:
Originally Posted by mission
The thread is clearly labeled, and once again you came in here to bump it up to complain. Look in the mirror man.
This is no different than a Bart Starr thread, Lombardi, Wayne Simmons, etc. Not one little itsy bitsy bit at all.
While some of you may not want to read the clearly labeled posts, thats fine. Don't. It's as simple as that. Some of us may want to. Why ruin it for someone else because you don't want to read it? That's just selfish.
Ty, I'm not even going to bother reading your balogna justification. You claim to have done it in one thread, and I clearly proved you wrong. This is no different.
:clap: :clap: :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldean
Totally agree about keeping all Favre-related information in the Favre thread. I'm glad for his years of service but come on, I come here to talk about the Packers.
Derangement is so funny to watch :drma:
I see nothing has changed on this site. Same people arguing back and forth, same people thriving on the drama, etc. It's like more effort is being put into policing people about what they can and can't post and threatening them with "time outs" than actually discussing football.
Don't mean to sound bitchy, I just really miss the way this place was before the Favre drama started. It divided many posters around here and caused many regs to stop posting. Now that I don't live in GB anymore, I really miss the contributions and old "regs" around here who provided a great insight to the team.
Actually, if all the old Regs just came back and started posting in football threads, starting actual football threads and generally just ignoring the knuckleheads, the tide would turn. But we have a few too many knuckleheads right now. We need to alter the balance. But that can only be done by actual participation.Quote:
Originally Posted by GBRulz
The formula seems so simple: Post in/read the threads/writers you enjoy, ignore the threads/writers you don't enjoy, and contribute your own ideas in a new thread. Critique arguments and topics and not people. Ignore those who attack you and not your argument and try not to attack others. It mostly works, although I'll admit I've broken these simple rules. Keep going.Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmax
About Favre: I am perplexed by those who seem to think it is an issue that can easily be brushed aside. Favre left in a flurry of chaos and controversy and he's performing extremely well for the fiercest rival the Packers currently have. Should it be surprising that people are all riled up over it? And will be for a long time? Is it unique to this Packer site?
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
http://packersnews.net/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=1
Doesn't have a single Favre thread on the front page as of this posting.
It's like some people deliberately do it because they know they'll get a certain response.
It's not hard to keep it Packers or related to things that might relate to the Packers or just generally interesting football conversation even.
But when it's "wow look at this Brett video doing this it's hilarious" ... well, come on ... do I (or anyone else) really need to explain this anymore?
There are a lot of Packer forums -- none of which I like more than this one -- that don't have this much Favre "drama" going on. Most have moved on or at least came up with a consensus decision to keep things Packers focused.
As for me, I'm not a big contributor because I'm rarely at my laptop. I use PackerRats as a news source on my phone and like to read what you guys contribute. The more I have to wade through junk, the more frustrating it becomes.
Best post of the thread. Petition to move this thread to the Brent thread. I also believe we should have a seperate BF forum as well, it's just gotten too out of hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldean
Quote:
Originally Posted by TennesseePackerBacker
A separate BF forum? Couldn't gex and MOBB just email each other?
:lol: too true, there are a couple of other posters I can think of who I see *only* posting in a Favre thread or only show up if the dreaded "F" word is mentioned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Campbell
These E-knights feel it is their sworn duty to defend the honor of everything that is Brentidict Arnold.
I asked for this about 15 months ago - give or take a month or two - and was skewered. Good luck! :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by TennesseePackerBacker
That's because of your Avatar!! No one like Eyore! :P He's all mopey. Now if you were Donkey from Shrek you'd be A OK! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by AtlPackFan
Hey...don't diss on Eyore. He's my hero...a realist, just like me...or is that manic depressive??? :mrgreen:Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderDan
I think for each ex-player that gets frequently talked about, just throw it all into one thread about that player. That being said, that doesn't mean every Favre reference needs to go in the Favre thread, like Brady or Manning comparisons. I am as big of a Favre fan as anyone but it is a Packers message board. This is a Favre thread, plain and simple and should be in the Favre thread. Maybe we need a Favre board and everytime a thread gets posted in the wrong place, move it and warn them. Too many warnings, boot em.
As for Ty, it doesn't surprise me that he is the first to knock someone down, or the first to be a jackass. He after all refers to himself in the 3rd party so we know he isn't dealing with a full deck. Partial and I go way back and don't agree a lot, but in this instance, Ty got owned for the hypocrite he is. This isn't the first time, it won't be the last. When you talk as much shit as Ty does, you are bound to have it spill over your hip waders and get confused, not that Mr 3rd Party isn't confused about himself already.
I'll add my 2 cents. There IS a difference between a Favre thread and a Bart Starr thread. Many people are still bitter and will still be bitter until Favre retires for good. All wounds heal with time but that time has not yet come and will not come as long as Favre is a Viking. These types of threads ONLY induce flames and people who start them probably know that. There really is almost NO reason to post a thread like this which is dedicated to Favre when we've got a thread where all that stuff can go anyway.
I feel like this should be obvious but right now Favre is a touchy subject. Let me phrase it this way. Can anything good come out of a thread like this? Probably not. Can something bad come out of a thread like this? Definitely. So we don't need it on the main board as it's own thread. Post this link in the Favre thread.
How did Ty get owned. My point is exactly YOUR point. Threads don't need to be started about BF. Mentioning his name or referring to him or other players in context is completely different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin
It might help if you actually read and then thought about what was written.
As for third person, it is a literary device. But, Ty wouldn't expect somebody who found "The little engine that could" to be challenging to understand using different literary techniques.
If you must ask......Snake is damn happy to put this in percentages for you, Ty...as I'm damn sure most all Rats are happy to read this (well I see you took on Channtheman's quote as your sig). I've always liked ChanntheMan, but at least I can spell his name right (you can't literary master ace), but respect his post to your defense (in one post on one topic..which begs the question just how weak are you to have to do that for a sig??)....I doubt anyone else defends your BS...so here goes in Ty's Getting Ownage:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Bigguns
1) Well...1% was you (the literary Master Ace of all aces in literary terms from Shakespeare to Hemingway) in not using proper punctuation. By using a question mark instead of a period you could have saved yourself 1%. That, sir, is irony.
2) Another 1% was using a crackhead jokester character for your avatar (Tyrone Bigguns), feigning respect (not just for others, of which you show none, but also for yourself), yet still claiming intellectual superiority over the average and good Rat poster post after post...Yeah, Tyrone Bigguns should be telling us how it is...I'd kick that guy in the nuts if he was real. You are as fake as your avatar. Must be clinching for something. Keep posting non-stop. We might not respect you, your posts, or your mindset...but I bet there's a legion that crave hearing you nit-pick/bitch about something in your myriad of posts. Keep it up. It's great. :roll: I bet that just draws in guests to join hearing your rip/nitpick/bitch non-stop....You are great to listen to, Ty. Personally, Snake has plenty of smart, Packer fan/knowledgable buddies that would love to join PackerRats, but can't stand your BS. I'm not scared of your BS. Your shit makes me sick, but I transpire through your BS. I'd hate to be Admin and cringe to your shittalking on EVERY topic. It'd be intimidating for a newbie/guest. Not Snake...You are a fake who's all about post counts.
3) 98% was you waking up and mistakenly thinking 10,000+ posts on PackerRats makes you a good poster, or thinking you are worth something in life. Snake posts on Rats cuz it's something to do late night on an off-nite to talk about the Packers. You post to validate your existence daily (24-7) with no friends/allies EVER. Truly sad are you, Ty. You are really, really sad. I'd hate to wake up as you. I'd either wake up and try and get my jollies baiting and trapping peeps with logic (Snake is smart as fuck too) and have fun with that..or just blow my head off. Look for the latter.
No one will miss your BS on here. Admin doesn't like to deal with it, nor do I (and Joe don't like you either...no one does)....but someone has to have some nuts. I have plenty. Snake ain't scared of you and your bullying techniques topic after topic. Go ahead try and fuck with Snake. Go ahead, Ty. I'll bury you. I've stayed off your shit for the past month, but can't stand you. No one can. Most are scared of you tearing into their posts. Snake craves it. If I was a MOD, you'd have been wiped years ago....and Snake is an Admin and Mod on 3 sites now (6 sites I'm on)....but you are cancer for sure.
When you get banned (you won't quit obviously), no one will miss you, care, or ask where Ty went. As smart as you think you are, Ty, you are basically a CPK....that is how you will be remembered.... Worthless and unmissed. Try and rape Snake's posts all you want, I don't care. That's how it is. Realize that, change...or be forgotten. Nobody likes your BS/negativity.
You are a very sad person.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeLH2006
P.S. All those words and you didn't address the question posed to Merlin. :lol:
The battle of the only two people(that I can remember) who use 3rd person when posting on this board.
Quick question, what possesses either of you to speak in 3rd person? Is it to get your point across? Help yourself stand out? Or is it that sense of self-empowerment you get when one speaks of themselves in 3rd person?
I say it's strange, but you both have your qualities as posters(positive and negative) and that's enough for me. Why berate Ty like that Snake? Has he wronged you? Or did you just wake up with a little sand in your vagina?
Asshole posters are fine to me. It's the E-knights I can't stand.
This is the crap that needs to end.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeLH2006
Snake, I think Ty is extremely smart and witty in his writing. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean he doesn't have a place on this website like everyone else.
Leave him alone, you don't have to do the back and forth with him if you don't want to.