I think Walford in the 3rd, or even in the 2nd is a better value than Williams in the 1st.
Printable View
I think Walford in the 3rd, or even in the 2nd is a better value than Williams in the 1st.
"Value" is a concept that mystifies me. If Williams turns out to be an All-Pro, and Walford turns out to be Quarless II, who cares about a "value pick"? Aren't you looking for guys who can play? I mean, if you could go back and re-draft, Donald Driver would've been a first or second round pick, and would've been a great "value" there.
Would you spend Maserati money to get a reliable and well-performing Acura?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz
Why wouldn't you? Its reliable, will be around for a long time and performs nearly as well as the other option. Isn't it worth the extra money to be sure?
Yeah, decreased risk means increased cost. Walford has more risk. Ergo, he is cheaper than Williams. All *seemingly*, mind you.
Cornerback, Utah.