Printable View
Studs
Davante Adams - 8 catches for 126 yards
Kyler Fackrell - 1 sack and 2 TFL
HHCD - INT to prevent a score
Defense - held in there despite no help from the offense.
Fans who stayed at Lambeau for the entire game
Duds
Hundley - 3 INT's, no pocket presence, nothing.
Mays - 3 carries, 2 fumbles
Fans who stayed at Lambeau for the entire game
Note: I feel there should be more duds, but Hundley was so bad, I think it's tough to grade the rest of the offense.
Spriggs deserves a dud.
Stubby was a dud just for staying with Hundley the entire game. When Hundley hurt his fingers in the 4th quarter, it was a perfect opportunity to sit him down and throw Callahan in there.
That push far out of bounds that drew flag was so stupid that HHCD gets a neutral grade. SDUD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joemailman
Ding ding ding. Is Callahan really worse than Hundley today? Why wouldn't you want to let Callahan shake the rust off?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
I don't get the NFL thinking that benching a QB ruins his confidence. It's not elementary school.
he screwed up somewhere else earlier in the game tooQuote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
i don't know about the defense being on the studs list. yes it could have been much worse, but that ravens offense has been putrid all season. they are very very bad on offense. and they scored 23 against us
The defense had no real chance to prevent points with the 5 turnovers we gave them and the starting field position on three of the turnovers. The Ravens may suck on offense, but our defense played pretty well.Quote:
Originally Posted by red
dickhead is now 3-7-1 as a head coach without a-rod saving his ass
getting close to a full season worth of games without a HOFer at QB, and he's no better then an average bears team
now i remember, haha drops an int that went right through his hands inside the 5, ravens ended up scoring on the driveQuote:
Originally Posted by beveaux1
Don't know that was a terribly catcheable ball, but between that and the unnecessary roughness, the INT is cancelled out.Quote:
Originally Posted by red
Were there any studs? Adams and Williams probably. I saw Perry and Fack make some plays. I tell you who the studs were...the guys on the other side. The game plan vs Hundley worked to perfection.
MM had a game plan and he was going to stick with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
His Team had an excellent week of Practise and the Packers were ready.
Mike McCarthy was in some new mild to serious form of SHOCK.
He absolutely had Dick All to lose going to Callahan. I really expected him to do that and demonstrate he wasn't 'a Sadist'.
Instead we saw he ws a Masochist.
This thread should be named "Davante and Duds"
Short fields all day long hurt.Quote:
Originally Posted by red
When you lose 23-0 there have to be other Duds:
Clay Matthews - For flexing after finally getting a sack after beating a guard playing tackle for the first time, and then promptly hurting himself.
Packer TE's - Kendricks and Dickrod combine for 2 catches for 8 yards. TE's should be the savior for an inexperienced, back-up QB.
The Wildcat - MM hasn't called one successful play using this yet.
MM - We all knew the season would be pretty much down the drain once Rodgers got hurt, but MM has
somehow made the team worse than even I expected.
Hundley - I had to mention him again because he hasn't shown that he can be an average back-up QB after 4 weeks.
I wouldn't get too hyped up about the defense. I expect the Steelers to hang 30+ on us next week.
Plain and simple the Packers were beaten up by a better bottom level NFL Team.
MM was flat out ...outcoached.
Their Defense was flat out...better that the Packers 'D'.
With Brett Hundley the Packers 'O' had little chance. That man lacks confidence. That man has Happy Feet. That man seems to 'only' be when he does scramble ...scramble to his right and too often then throw the ball away. Why...he cannot see the field and options.
That man wasn't properly prepared to operate as an NFL QB that can run an offense. Brett Hundley isn't to blame . His Coaches are to blame.
The man only has so much ability based on his experience running the Packers NO. 1 Offense.
How much has that really been? I blame Mike McCarthy. Mike McCarthy has failed Brett Hundley.
That about sums it up. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by denverYooper
look at mr optimismQuote:
Originally Posted by Teamcheez1
i think it could be way worse then that. they put up 40 to a titans team who is better then us
Agreed. Hell, we turned it over 3 times in the first half and the Ravens scored 2 lousy FGs. Even with these TOs had we had a competent QB we might have won that game.Quote:
Originally Posted by beveaux1
This kind of talk makes me laugh. What makes some think Callahan would have been any better? I don't blame Stubby at all. Its hard to make chicken salad out of chicken shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
Hundley is his chicken but when he was drafted they thought they could mold him like they did with Flynn. It sucks it didn't work but c'est la vie.
You said it yourself. What difference does it make? The season is tanked. Nobody knows how good Callahan is. He might be just as shit as Randy. We didn't know Randy was shit till we played him. So play Callahan and find out...or get somebody else. At least make the games less laughable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugger
Or let Hundley take his lumps and let him develop as a workable backup. It's not like they're looking for their QB of the future. M3 didn't do Hundley any favors today (apparently because he was afraid of their running game), but it didn't help that they lost 2 RTs and 2 RBs in the last few weeks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
The idea of spending my Sunday afternoons watching developmental football doesn't appeal to me. That game today was just not interesting or entertaining. For the first time in a long time I won't be eagerly awaiting next Sunday's game.Quote:
Originally Posted by denverYooper
The best case scenario for Callahan would be developmental football.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
The only reason to stick with Hundley is if you think there's something there, and his play can improve. I didn't see a sign of that. If you think what's out there is what you've got, move on.
Yup, but I figure there might be more fireworks, more action just because of Callahan's personality and that he's got nothing to lose. It's all about entertainment to me. The Packers are fielding a very, very inferior product. ...Maybe I'll watch soccer. Is bowling still on TV?:-)Quote:
Originally Posted by denverYooper
Plus he probably doesn't chew gum while quarterbacking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
This is where I'm getting to as well. I didn't watch on Sunday as the Vikes were on at the same time, and it's not shown here except in a bar (and no Sunday Ticket, I cut the cord years ago). I'm getting to the point where I can't justify the time and money expense of watching the rest of this season in a bar. I'll watch the Pitts and MN games as those will be on regular TV, but the other 4, likely not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
If Clay hurt his groin after that sack celebration. It's just full of irony. Sack/groin. Or because he hasn't stretched his celebration muscles in a long time.
I really hope we dump Dom and give him one more year.
Lowry had a solid game. Brett played himself out of a job this week.
Sorry this is late, but I have to add 1 stud to the list, and they didn't even realize it. I didn't have time to take a picture of this, but I'm adding the De Pere Theatre to the stud list.
The theatre plays packer games in the theatre for every game, actually always pulls in nice crowds. Their sign outside though looked like this (as best I can write it):
12:00-3:30
GB vs BAL
DESPICABLE
ME 3 7:00
I laughed.
^^^ That's pretty funny.
Reminds me of the sign at a Tomah bar: "7-9AM: Third Shift Happy Hour."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Oday
He did.
I was noticing that since he bulked-up he is kind of an ugly body guy. Lets just say he doesn't look like JJ Watt or Julius Peppers. Maybe JJ Peppers, a really big high school player.
Don't tell him I said any of this.
If anyone in Packer Nation felt anything but embarrassment for the name and Franchise Green Bay Packers; that person has drifted off to La La Land. :whaa:Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi
That performance by Green Bay placed a whole new emphasis on the word 'ridiculous'.
Watching Mike McCarthy on the sidelines has actually now become like watching 'a Comedy Act' like 'The Three Stooges'.
http://listverse.wpengine.netdna-cdn...-3-stooges.jpg
I'm not sure which one he resembles most so I'm going with a hybrid of all three:
https://www.sideshowtoy.com/photo.php?sku=400303