Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Favre possibly coming back?

  1. #1
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,236

    Favre possibly coming back?

    FOX 11 OF GREENBAY REPORTS

    Favre was talking to a member of the Biloxi Sun or whatever that paper is called. He was asked if an injury happed mid season if he'd consider coming back for a possible run. He said he doesn't know, if that came up and they called that he might be enticed to come back.

  2. #2
    Nick, old news
    Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

  3. #3
    Sheephead, do your duty.

    #14

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by DonHutson
    Sheephead, do your duty.

    Is he the double post police?

  5. #5
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,656
    Blog Entries
    2
    I listened to an interview with Pete Dougherty, think his name is. I think he's a bit bland as a writer but he covers the Packers for the Packer Report or something.

    He gave his inside take on Favre.

    His attitude was along the process MM communicated with Favre and wanted to make sure Favre was 100% committed before making his call. It was his view that there was no ego massaging, no please come back's, and no we need you from MM or TT. Their public tone was we hope he comes back but in private they were fully fine with moving on either way.

    He felt TT and MM were high enough on AROD that they were ready for the new era to begin if Favre was not 100% positive he wanted to returning.

    Oh, and it might have helped that Favre's play last year helped them both get nice nice rich extensions (my commentary)


    Cheers,
    B
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    Oh, and it might have helped that Favre's play last year helped them both get nice nice rich extensions (my commentary)
    So, Favre's play was solely responsible for that? Not because McCarthy was the first coach since Holmgren to coach Favre up? Not because the defense and special teams were top 10, the WRs corps was top 5, Donald Lee paid them for trusting the starting position to him, and Ryan Grant was mint? Not because an aging roster with little depth was transformed to a young team with a lot of young talent in two years?

  7. #7
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,656
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    Oh, and it might have helped that Favre's play last year helped them both get nice nice rich extensions (my commentary)
    So, Favre's play was solely responsible for that? Not because McCarthy was the first coach since Holmgren to coach Favre up? Not because the defense and special teams were top 10, the WRs corps was top 5, Donald Lee paid them for trusting the starting position to him, and Ryan Grant was mint? Not because an aging roster with little depth was transformed to a young team with a lot of young talent in two years?

    Does the word "helped" mean "solely responsible" ?? Are you getting more sensitive in your old age ?
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky


    Does the word "helped" mean "solely responsible" ?? Are you getting more sensitive in your old age ?
    Male PMS? :P

  9. #9
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,656
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky


    Does the word "helped" mean "solely responsible" ?? Are you getting more sensitive in your old age ?
    Male PMS? :P

    I've had that lately; work too stressful, sleep in minimal, and head cold doesn't let me sleep well anyways
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007




    Male PMS? :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    I've had that lately; work too stressful, sleep in minimal, and head cold doesn't let me sleep well anyways
    ...follow the light.....go to the room of the Holy Grail. :P

  11. #11
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,692
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007




    Male PMS? :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    I've had that lately; work too stressful, sleep in minimal, and head cold doesn't let me sleep well anyways
    ...follow the light.....go to the room of the Holy Grail. :P

    ...and there 007 will be waiting for you.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007
    Quote Originally Posted by GrnBay007




    Male PMS? :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    I've had that lately; work too stressful, sleep in minimal, and head cold doesn't let me sleep well anyways
    ...follow the light.....go to the room of the Holy Grail. :P

    ...and there 007 will be waiting for you.
    NO, NO......007 doesn't go to the grail room!!!! eek!!

  13. #13
    Legendary Rat HOFer vince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    God's Country
    Posts
    5,363
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    I listened to an interview with Pete Dougherty... He gave his inside take on Favre...

    His attitude was along the process MM communicated with Favre and wanted to make sure Favre was 100% committed before making his call. It was his view that there was no ego massaging, no please come back's, and no we need you from MM or TT. Their public tone was we hope he comes back but in private they were fully fine with moving on either way.

    He felt TT and MM were high enough on AROD that they were ready for the new era to begin if Favre was not 100% positive he wanted to returning.
    I think this is an accurate assessment by Dougherty, and Favre's emotional responses to the media reinforce that MM and TT took the exactly correct approach.

    Brett Favre is a big boy with a ton of experience. He understands his value to the team without having to be begged to return by management. He also clearly understands the importance of hard work throughout the offseason, particularly for an aging player - even though he impetuously (and predictably) says that returning without doing the required offseason work would be "tempting."

    If Brett were to have returned, he would have owed it to his legacy, the Green Bay Packers, and we fans (who have given him the financial capacity to provide for his family and his heirs for generations to come) to get himself prepared to play at the top of his game. The Green Bay Packers owe it to the team and to the fans to demand that of each and every player, particularly their highest paid players. That's understandably much more difficult to do at 39 than 29, but that doesn't change the fact that it must be demanded.

    A personal decision about retiring, which few players get the luxury of making, deserves to be made rationally and objectively. Having the team apply emotional pressure to persuade him to hang on for its own self-interest and/or making special concessions for one player would be unprofessional and compromising to the integrity of the team.

    I certainly hope he doesn't make the mistake of returning at the age of 39 after ridng a tractor all offseason, but I don't think that'd be much of a risk knowing the leadership we have with this team.

  14. #14
    Moose Rat HOFer woodbuck27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,498
    Quote Originally Posted by vince
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    I listened to an interview with Pete Dougherty... He gave his inside take on Favre...

    His attitude was along the process MM communicated with Favre and wanted to make sure Favre was 100% committed before making his call. It was his view that there was no ego massaging, no please come back's, and no we need you from MM or TT. Their public tone was we hope he comes back but in private they were fully fine with moving on either way.

    He felt TT and MM were high enough on AROD that they were ready for the new era to begin if Favre was not 100% positive he wanted to returning.
    I think this is an accurate assessment by Dougherty, and Favre's emotional responses to the media reinforce that MM and TT took the exactly correct approach.

    Brett Favre is a big boy with a ton of experience. He understands his value to the team without having to be begged to return by management. He also clearly understands the importance of hard work throughout the offseason, particularly for an aging player - even though he impetuously (and predictably) says that returning without doing the required offseason work would be "tempting."

    If Brett were to have returned, he would have owed it to his legacy, the Green Bay Packers, and we fans (who have given him the financial capacity to provide for his family and his heirs for generations to come) to get himself prepared to play at the top of his game. The Green Bay Packers owe it to the team and to the fans to demand that of each and every player, particularly their highest paid players. That's understandably much more difficult to do at 39 than 29, but that doesn't change the fact that it must be demanded.

    A personal decision about retiring, which few players get the luxury of making, deserves to be made rationally and objectively. Having the team apply emotional pressure to persuade him to hang on for its own self-interest and/or making special concessions for one player would be unprofessional and compromising to the integrity of the team.

    I certainly hope he doesn't make the mistake of returning at the age of 39 after ridng a tractor all offseason, but I don't think that'd be much of a risk knowing the leadership we have with this team.
    Yes it's done. FAVRE is retired and will remain retired.

    Favre of all people realizes the sense all in that now. Final and RETIREMENT.

    Packers Forever.
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

  15. #15
    Grandpa Rat HOFer The Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In Bear's Territory
    Posts
    2,784
    Please let it go.
    Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

  16. #16
    Senior Rat HOFer oregonpackfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,221
    When I read and listen to speculation about Favre returning it disappoints me for several reasons.

    First, I think a number of Packer fans simply refuse to accept the concept of Favre's retirement. We have been spoiled by having the same future Hall of Fame quarterback for the past 16 years. It is just time for him to move on.

    For Favre's sake, I am glad he chose to retire when he did. At age 38, his last year was one of the most productive seasons he had in his career. Most Packer fans, including me, thought in August of 2007 that this team just had the potential to produce a .500 winning season. They surprised us with a remarkable 13-3 regular season! Though football is certainly a team effort, much of the Packers' success on offense has to be attributed to Favre's fine play.

    What is sad for some aging stars is that their skills decline but they refuse to accept it and try to play beyond their years. Both Johnny Unitas and Joe Montana were examples of stars who tried playing for other teams in a vain and futile attempt to resurrect their careers.

    A few aging stars play too long and have their career end with a serious injury. Joe Theisman had a horrific broken leg on national TV which ended a career he tried to prolong. With a highly serious concussion he received last season, Trent Green probably should retire. But at age 35 he is trying to hook up with another team.

    I am glad for Favre that he had a very successful season last year. I am also relieved for him that he did not suffer a serious injury like an ACL tear or a broken limb. I just hope he is not "persuaded" by coaches and/or fans to come back when he needs to retire with dignity.

  17. #17
    Senior Rat All-Pro Packnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oak Lawn, IL
    Posts
    2,232
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky
    Oh, and it might have helped that Favre's play last year helped them both get nice nice rich extensions (my commentary)
    So, Favre's play was solely responsible for that? Not because McCarthy was the first coach since Holmgren to coach Favre up? Not because the defense and special teams were top 10, the WRs corps was top 5, Donald Lee paid them for trusting the starting position to him, and Ryan Grant was mint? Not because an aging roster with little depth was transformed to a young team with a lot of young talent in two years?
    Harv, I see what your saying but I believe it works both ways does'nt it? A huge part of our WR play was YAC and you have to give #4 the credit for that. He hit those guys in stride more times than I can ever remember ANY QB ever doing. The Detroit game was a prime example. Those 2 td passes in the Denver game were point blank precision throws.

    Once you make the D worry about the WR's, it does open things up for the TE.

    With the improved play of the offense, our D was'nt on the field as much. Also, we were leading a great majority of the time which also made things easier for the D.

    Favre had an oustanding season and without him, all the things you cited DO NOT HAPPEN to the degree that it did. But, as they say the "proof is in the pudding". We'll see how this plays out with A-Rod..............

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •