Tank doesn't bother me anymore than some other posters do. If I don't like their topics or whatever, I simply ignore them. I don't get why people find that so hard to do with Tank. It's not like he is the only one in here who likes to stir the pot on things.
I didn't vote in this poll, but my thought is, if someone warrants something to get banned, then do it for good or don't do it at all.
I'm laissez faire in politics, socio/culturally, and with Anti Polar Bear, (although I think he could be called Bi-Polar Bear.)
Cant' some place be found for him? Like let him write a column?
more freedom, less government. Go Sarah!
From Mad's original Post: "To date there have only been 2 members banned from PackerRats."Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers
So, who voted for Tank? Hoosier? Tank? Mazzin? Probably Harlan. Off with their heads too.
Actually, I'm kind of indifferent, but I did pile on with my "yes" vote.
I thought Mazzin was the 2nd. Guess I was wrong.[/quote] Sorry Mazzin.
My house is in Georgia but Wisconsin is my home.
But its not as easy as simply ignoring, i mean its not just the topics he creates that he posts in, he also does it in other threads that actually were good until he got their
For the record Tank is technically banned already. This is just a way to decide if he should be gone for good like GBRulz said. His thread talking about mods had nothing to do with this. Maintain the quality of the forum is what it is about. Everyone has a right to their opinion.
For those that are newer or dont know, other than trying to change the revealing personal info rule other rules can be proposed at PackersRats but a poll has to be ran and the decision of the majority is what goes.
HOFer
Cool. The newest registered user is Îïòèìèçàöèÿ ñàéòîâ Íåîáõî.
Kind of ironic how we've had a flood of new posters today, and they're all from foreign countries.
Code:Îïòèìèçàöèÿ ñàéòîâ Íåîáõî Îïòèìèçàöèÿ ñàéòîâ. Íåîáõîäèìîñòü 21 May 2008 0 jhghhjyrrr Poland 21 May 2008 0 Zloydadniak Sweden 21 May 2008 0 HORRURORP Belgium 21 May 2008 0 Angie USA 21 May 2008 0 befopoyda 21 May 2008 0 onereevor Brazil 21 May 2008 0 ThahtextTrusa Pakistan 21 May 2008 0 HutAstose Portugal 21 May 2008 0 tierDaclert The Bahamas 21 May 2008 0 Silmincichmaxs Cape Verde 21 May 2008 0 anommopay Croatia 21 May 2008 0 jhghhjyrr Poland 21 May 2008 0 ElolaVinaplep Tanzania 21 May 2008 0
VERY very seldom I agree with Hoosier, but in this case, yes. There's a legalese word for this that I can't remember that is specifically unConstitutional.
Harvey, are you implying some or all of those are actually Tank?
I guess there are just Packer fans everywhere!
</delurk>
I think most of them come from Tanks house.I guess there are just Packer fans everywhere!
BILL OF ATTAINDER, that's what it is. Article One Section 10 of the Constitution--but then, I guess the Packerrats Forum isn't Congress.
HOFer
Let's see. We had one poster sign up in the previous 6 days. Then, today we get 14 new users and they have weird names and are all from foreign countries. What do you think happened?
I'd voted "no" before I read the whole thread, based on my feeling that I'm willing to put up with his silliness in the name of letting people speak their minds...I'm sure most of us annoy someone here now and again...but reading about the efforts to scam the site with multiple account names to cover his tracks...that's not okay and would push me to the other side. If I could go back, I'd vote yes.
Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
Vince Lombardi
Since I am not yet banned, I'll defend myself.Let's see. We had one poster sign up in the previous 6 days. Then, today we get 14 new users and they have weird names and are all from foreign countries. What do you think happened?
Check their ips, madtownpoker. It aint me. Is some1 setting me up? I dont care.
I actually think this thread is funny. Is there a better way to go out than with all this attention?
Well, if this is my last post, I just wanna thank all those who voted "no."
Good bye, Rataquille!!!
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
No, we're usually more civil than them.
I'm not sure Bills of Attainder is quite what you're looking for, Tex--those are where government prevents a trial by having the legislature just vote that someone's guilty of a crime. I think what you and Hoosier are looking for is closer to Ex Post Facto law, which is next door in Article I, Section IX, which is also banned by the US Constitution in government. This is where something that was legal when done is made retroactively illegal and punished. I thought Hoosier's argument was something like "Unless it was clear there was a rule he was breaking at the time he did things, it's not fair to nail it for him now".
Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
Vince Lombardi
I see your point. However, he's only got ten no votes, and one of those was mine--along with several others who talked like they voted no.Let's see. We had one poster sign up in the previous 6 days. Then, today we get 14 new users and they have weird names and are all from foreign countries. What do you think happened?
If he wasn't gonna stuff the ballot box, why else do something so obviously inflammatory? I find myself acting like his defense attorney. REASONABLE DOUBT!
Highly doubtful any of those are Tank. This site sometimes gets 30-40 spam accounts a day. We sort through and activate those that are legit. You should see some of the perverted spam accounts that try to get on the site...ick!
I am not voting in regards to APB, but I will echo Bretsky's post..
I left JSO to get away from juvenille bullshit, have never looked back. I love this place. I don't socialize with a ton of people outside of my workplaces, so this place really becomes an outlet of sorts for shooting the breeze with good people. I ignore what most are probably sick of concerning APB, but if the quality of this place drops because of anyone and it goes un-dealt with and a nice quasi-socialization hangout turns downward ala JSO..well, I vote NO on that scenario.
you can wipe the drool from your mouth anytime...we all know that sorting through that smut is the highlight of your day..outside of the jello wrestling girl-on-girl daydreams while you count the days til' Prison Break resumes...Highly doubtful any of those are Tank. This site sometimes gets 30-40 spam accounts a day. We sort through and activate those we feel are legit. You should see some of the perverted spam accounts that try to get on the site...ick!
I voted no. He's opinionated, but so am I. I can think of others that are much more hate-filled and you have to wonder how in the world you have anything in common with such a moron. If tanks been warned several times and he hasnt changed his ways-well maybe it's time.
Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
several is putting it mildly.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
