No, I did put a mis leading headline up there, not intentional, but poor none-the-less. Or good, if its traffic you want.
I was referring to the Tweet and not the Q&A. Vic was his usual boring, smarmy self in the Q&A.
Next question is how did NFL.com cover it? They haven't been too in the bag for ownership, but I wonder if they venture into this territory when a player (or Jim Irsay) is in trouble with the 5-0?