Page 9 of 28 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 19 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 599

Thread: Official Non NFC North NFL News 2014 (Unofficial Johnny Manziel)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    Yup, and the arbitrator made some shit up to decide - i.e. he was lined up as a TE when he was within 4 yards of a lineman. lol, what? I think it's a bad idea to draw that line in the sand. Stating the criteria gets back to the idea that coaches might be told where they can line up their guys based on what future salary they might command.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  2. #2
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    I run block a little better than Jimmy Graham. I am declaring myself an offensive tackle.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  3. #3
    Was that arbitration ironclad and binding?

    I'd expect Graham's people to appeal that decision if they are able to.

  4. #4
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,710
    Quote Originally Posted by smuggler View Post
    Was that arbitration ironclad and binding?

    I'd expect Graham's people to appeal that decision if they are able to.
    The Collective Bargaining Agreement allows Graham to appeal the decision to a three-member Appeals Panel within 10 days of the decision. The NFLPA announced in a statement they will "carefully determine next steps in this matter."
    .
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  5. #5
    The arbitrator also cited his Twitter profile. Once again proving that everything you do and write down will evetually go on your permanent record.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  6. #6
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    I don't know how to define a tight end, but I know it when I see one. Graham is a tight end.

  7. #7
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Patler View Post
    I don't know how to define a tight end, but I know it when I see one. Graham is a tight end.
    You are defining him based on his size. He is NOT a TE. He doesn't block. He doesn't try to block. They don't ask him to block. He is a WR who is a matchup nightmare. Too fast to cover with LB, too big to cover with DB.

    Edit: He also was rarely on the field in running situations.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  8. #8
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Patler View Post
    I don't know how to define a tight end, but I know it when I see one. Graham is a tight end.
    You are defining him based on his size. He is NOT a TE. He doesn't block. He doesn't try to block. They don't ask him to block. He is a WR who is a matchup nightmare. Too fast to cover with LB, too big to cover with DB.

    Edit: He also was rarely on the field in running situations.



    No, I was lampooning Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's often-quoted description of pornography:

    I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [hard-core pornography]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.

    Concurring, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).
    Last edited by Patler; 07-03-2014 at 07:31 AM.

  9. #9
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,623
    Quote Originally Posted by Patler View Post
    No, I was lampooning Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's often-quoted description of pornography:
    Well played mauer....I should have caught that one, but I am annoyed by the fact that everyone seems to think he is built like a TE therefore he is a TE.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  10. #10
    Fried Rat HOFer KYPack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Bluegrass
    Posts
    8,659
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    You are defining him based on his size. He is NOT a TE. He doesn't block. He doesn't try to block. They don't ask him to block. He is a WR who is a matchup nightmare. Too fast to cover with LB, too big to cover with DB.

    Edit: He also was rarely on the field in running situations.
    Graham is the prototype Joker.

    The good blocking, pass catcher guy we all grew up with is a generational spot.

    It's like the Jim Taylor FB, a victim of the evolution of the NFL to a pass oriented league.

    Jason Witten, Heath Miller guys are the last of their kind.

  11. #11
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,623
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack View Post
    Graham is the prototype Joker.

    The good blocking, pass catcher guy we all grew up with is a generational spot.

    It's like the Jim Taylor FB, a victim of the evolution of the NFL to a pass oriented league.

    Jason Witten, Heath Miller guys are the last of their kind.
    I don't disagree. I think the position of TE is kinda gone in the NFL. Very few guys can block and catch. I would stop pretending to use TE's and simply run 4 wide, and then use U-71 when I want to mash.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  12. #12
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack View Post
    Graham is the prototype Joker.

    The good blocking, pass catcher guy we all grew up with is a generational spot.

    It's like the Jim Taylor FB, a victim of the evolution of the NFL to a pass oriented league.

    Jason Witten, Heath Miller guys are the last of their kind.
    I guess you're right, and it's too bad, really. Witten in particular has always been one of my favorite guys to watch, loved seeing him release off a block, move 5 yards down field, catch a pass and find a seam for 10 more. And 10 years in the NFL, they still haven't found a pair of pants that fit him properly! In that mold was Bubba Franks, even if he (obviously) wasn't as good.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  13. #13
    Fried Rat HOFer KYPack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Bluegrass
    Posts
    8,659
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Guiness View Post
    I guess you're right, and it's too bad, really. Witten in particular has always been one of my favorite guys to watch, loved seeing him release off a block, move 5 yards down field, catch a pass and find a seam for 10 more. And 10 years in the NFL, they still haven't found a pair of pants that fit him properly! In that mold was Bubba Franks, even if he (obviously) wasn't as good.
    I miss that 'ol style ball, too.

    I've often wondered if you could get a 2 way, in-line style TE, a pair of live RB's and run an old school offense vs some of these current D's.

    Some of the younger teams have never seen or played against those kind of offenses.

    Run a little 31 power BOB on their asses and see what they do about it.

  14. #14
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,710
    This ruling could end up helping the other top TE's in the NFL. Graham will likely sign a contract extension large enough to raise the franchise tag dollar amount for TE's.

    I actually don't know that Graham is being hurt here unfairly. Last year he was 15th in the NFL in receiving yards. The franchise tag number for a TE is comparable to what the 15th rated wide receiver gets. Of course, Graham scores lots of TD's which also needs to be factored in. But I think it will be. Whether he signs an extension with New Orleans this year or becomes a FA next year, he will probably end up with a contract averaging 10 mil per year which is about where he should be based on production.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  15. #15
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    This ruling could end up helping the other top TE's in the NFL. Graham will likely sign a contract extension large enough to raise the franchise tag dollar amount for TE's.

    I actually don't know that Graham is being hurt here unfairly. Last year he was 15th in the NFL in receiving yards. The franchise tag number for a TE is comparable to what the 15th rated wide receiver gets. Of course, Graham scores lots of TD's which also needs to be factored in. But I think it will be. Whether he signs an extension with New Orleans this year or becomes a FA next year, he will probably end up with a contract averaging 10 mil per year which is about where he should be based on production.
    Will he get that long term extension though? I can see NO making him play under the tag for a year, or even 2. Especially considering it's the lower of the 2 tags, the non-exclusive one. I think the only way he gets his money is if now that other teams see that he'll get paid as a TE, someone is willing to give up those 2 first rounders, moves in and makes an offer.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  16. #16
    I dont know that hes good enough for 2 first round picks and a mega contract

  17. #17
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by smuggler View Post
    I dont know that hes good enough for 2 first round picks and a mega contract
    While he's not the most valuable player, he's elite at his position, in his prime, and most importantly, available, which is quite an oddity in this league. Generally see maybe 1 or 2 guys per season in that position.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  18. #18
    Seriously, you kids are taking photos in the bathroom?




    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...resting-photo/
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  19. #19
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Seriously, you kids are taking photos in the bathroom?

    No shortage of speculation over at PFT on why he's rolling up a bill, or more accurately, what reason other than nose candy could it be?

    Funniest comment I saw: He obviously is making an antenna for his money phone.
    One to make you think:
    Has a 1st round draft pick ever been released before their first training camp?

    I would stop paying this kid right now.
    I believe the most recent answer to that question is Dimitrius Underwood.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  20. #20
    Sugadaddy Rat HOFer Zool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Across the border to the West
    Posts
    13,320
    He's like a kid out there!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •