The review goes over more players than most things I've read. The biggest problem is using the PFF scores, because even if they are a valid assessment, how they come up with them seems like voodoo calculated from witchcraft. At least with QB rating (not the QBR which is also voodoo) what goes into the magic formula is perfectly understandable. For instance you take exception to the JS article about the smaller line holding up against the run, seemingly based on PFF scores, but if those scores are due mostly to a lack of pressure, the JS article could still be valid.


Also some minor blog technical glitches, the page http://lambeaufieldinsider.com/artic...od-bad-ugly--2 has a 2025 date so it is always showing up as the most recent post, and both versions 3 and 4 of your 2011-12 draft evaluation pages are in blog list.