View Poll Results: Who makes the 53?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Flynn

    3 9.68%
  • Tolzien

    8 25.81%
  • Tolzien #2, Flynn #3

    6 19.35%
  • Flynn #2, Tolzien #3

    14 45.16%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: Flynn Tolzien do-over

  1. #61
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    I guess I should have said the highest and lowest risk:reward choices. Most people who want Flynn as the backup also want a backup backup. Most people who like Tolzien feel comfortable putting all their eggs in that basket.

    I'm sure TT will cut both and rock Cobb as the backup.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  2. #62
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,061
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    I guess I should have said the highest and lowest risk:reward choices. Most people who want Flynn as the backup also want a backup backup. Most people who like Tolzien feel comfortable putting all their eggs in that basket.

    I'm sure TT will cut both and rock Cobb as the backup.
    I am in the boat of Tolzien is ahead of Flynn but after last year I am not against rolling with 3 QBs on the roster.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  3. #63
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    I still don't think we'll keep both Matt and Scott. I suspect we don't have that luxury. I too like Tolzien's upside but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they go with Flynn. I just hope if they do they don't come to regret it. Tolzien isn't going to last too long as a FA.

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    OK, so then you vote for the Packers keeping 3 QBs every season that 3 respectables can be rounded-up?

    That might be overly risk averse, wasteful. Most GMs, include TT, lean to 2
    When it comes to the Packers and injuries I don't think they can be compared to what the rest of the league is doing. They are the exception, in a bad way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •