Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: Why Didn't Rodgers Challenge Sherman?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    I tended to think the way things went was somewhat of an advantage to the Packers. Their #1CB covering your #3 WR should be very beneficial. It meant Cobb across the middle and Jordy on the other sideline had better chances, and for a while it looked like Jordy was going to have a big night, a few catches on a drive that resulted in a TD. That seemed to taper off, I couldn't quite sort out what happened, did they give the CB covering him help?
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  2. #2
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Is it true that we NEVER threw in Sherman's direction at all Thursday night?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger View Post
    Is it true that we NEVER threw in Sherman's direction at all Thursday night?
    Yes. But I have a better question. Why on God's green earth would you waste throws to Boykin wrapped up with Sherman when Cobb and Nelson are getting nickel CBs and the new guy?

    I would be more concerned if they never threw to that side of the field period.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  4. #4
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Yes. But I have a better question. Why on God's green earth would you waste throws to Boykin wrapped up with Sherman when Cobb and Nelson are getting nickel CBs and the new guy?

    I would be more concerned if they never threw to that side of the field period.
    My thought exactly. I would gladly have my #3 WR covered by the other teams #1. That should open everyone else up. I think part of the problem was they need to go to the TE even more.

    Hell, the O would move the ball pretty well but had long fields all night. After a couple of first downs we would still be punting from our 35 and Mastay had some bad punts and couldn't flip the field position battle.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  5. #5
    Rivers was BALLN! made sherman look pedestrian! Hopefully in the NFCCG ScareRon Rodgers will make amends for week one foolishness
    Brandon Marshall, MAN...!!
    Jimmie Johnson: Nascar's G.O.A.T......

  6. #6
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    I just checked the box score. The O never went 3 and out all night. They just couldn't sustain long drives.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderDan View Post
    I just checked the box score. The O never went 3 and out all night. They just couldn't sustain long drives.
    I wonder if that is related to the 4th Quarter comeback question. Someone pointed out McCarthy lamenting he did not get to his big shot plays due to game circumstance and down and distance.

    If you take the Packers big play away (either coverage or pass rush) they can struggle launching 12 play scoring drives. While they have them (and last year might have had more with Lacy and a hurt Rodgers than typical) I would bet its not as common as some other dominant offenses.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  8. #8
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    If McCarthy wants to run 65-70 plays a game you need some longer drives. But I think the O is built around longer plays not 4 yards a play and 6 first downs on the way to scoring.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderDan View Post
    If McCarthy wants to run 65-70 plays a game you need some longer drives. But I think the O is built around longer plays not 4 yards a play and 6 first downs on the way to scoring.
    It would help also if your D stopped yielding first downs on penalties.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  10. #10
    Rivers is a very ballsy QB, he doesn't back down from anyone. Which at times can be a detriment, but imo it has more upside than down.

  11. #11
    Drowned Rat HOFer denverYooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,573
    Stefanie Loh ‏@StefanieLoh 1h
    Chargers' Keenan @Keenan13Allen Allen on Richard Sherman: "He's just a normal guy. We're gonna go @ him. He's not really a shut down corner"
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  12. #12
    Drowned Rat HOFer denverYooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,573
    I'm sure Sherman just needs to adjust his adderall dosage and everything will be all right.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  13. #13
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    The most exposed player on that defense last night was Chancellor not Sherman. They took their shots at Sherman but in the end it was for what? 54 yards?

    Kam Chancellor will have nightmares about Antonio Gates this week.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    The most exposed player on that defense last night was Chancellor not Sherman. They took their shots at Sherman but in the end it was for what? 54 yards?

    Kam Chancellor will have nightmares about Antonio Gates this week.
    Very nice breakdown by Matt Bowen here: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...for-nfl-week-2

    Funny, but the "exposed" Sherman doesn't feature in this TD.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  15. #15
    Manning is challenging Sherman as well, with success!!
    Brandon Marshall, MAN...!!
    Jimmie Johnson: Nascar's G.O.A.T......

  16. #16
    Drowned Rat HOFer denverYooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,573
    Quote Originally Posted by Infamous View Post
    Manning is challenging Sherman as well, with success!!
    It's clearly paying off for the Broncos.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  17. #17
    mannings last toss was against Sherman
    Brandon Marshall, MAN...!!
    Jimmie Johnson: Nascar's G.O.A.T......

  18. #18
    no timeouts scored in 40-plus seconds
    Brandon Marshall, MAN...!!
    Jimmie Johnson: Nascar's G.O.A.T......

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •