Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 54

Thread: How good is Cobb?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    How good is Cobb?

    I kinda see Randall Cobb as a good #3. He's not as good as Jennings at getting open. James Jones was more productive.

    Cobb is a good returner. A nice utility player. He can run out of backfield, but is no Reggie Bush.

    My memory of Cobb's career is fuzzy. Has he shown enough to suspect he'll develop into a strong #1 or #2?

  2. #2
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    much better than jones as a wr, not as good as jennings (when he was here and healthy) as a wr, better all-around than both.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by gbgary View Post
    much better than jones as a wr, not as good as jennings (when he was here and healthy) as a wr, better all-around than both.
    Jones and Jennings are both past their primes. I don't think Cobb is as good as either at their peaks.

    I can't really digest the stats. Cobb has had a slow start this year, he will probably pick it up. I just don't have a memory of him making great catches like I saw from Jones.

    What are Cobb's assets as a receiver?
    Last edited by Harlan Huckleby; 09-18-2014 at 08:20 PM.

  4. #4
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    Jones and Jennings are both past their primes. I don't think Cobb is as good as either at their peaks.

    I can't really digest the stats. Cobb has had a slow start this year, he will probably pick it up. I just don't have a memory of him making great catches like I saw from Jones.

    What are Cobb's assets as a receiver?
    Cobb has already had a better year than Jones ever has IMO.

    The best thing about Cobb is the best thing about every good slot guy. He has suddeness in his cuts, runs clean routes, good hands, and has a feel for leveraging defenders to find windows. As a bonus he's dangerous in the open field which can turn those quick developing underneith routes into big plays. As a bonus, bonus he can get you out of a game at running back or quarterback.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    Jones and Jennings are both past their primes. I don't think Cobb is as good as either at their peaks.

    I can't really digest the stats. Cobb has had a slow start this year, he will probably pick it up. I just don't have a memory of him making great catches like I saw from Jones.

    What are Cobb's assets as a receiver?
    He seems to be at his best when Rodgers gets in trouble and breaks the pocket. It's when all the routes have been run and it's every man for himself that he and Rodgers seem to have a real connection. When he was a kid and they were diagraming plays on the QBs palm, Cobb was surely the best player on the field.

  6. #6
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    Jones and Jennings are both past their primes. I don't think Cobb is as good as either at their peaks.

    I can't really digest the stats. Cobb has had a slow start this year, he will probably pick it up. I just don't have a memory of him making great catches like I saw from Jones.

    What are Cobb's assets as a receiver?
    Cobb isn't the same kind of receiver as Jennings and Jones were and this is probably why we drafted Adams last spring. Cobb is still a slot receiver and if Adams continues to come on Randall will return to his spot.

  7. #7
    Senior Rat HOFer Maxie the Taxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Loon Lake, Florida
    Posts
    9,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger View Post
    Cobb isn't the same kind of receiver as Jennings and Jones were and this is probably why we drafted Adams last spring. Cobb is still a slot receiver and if Adams continues to come on Randall will return to his spot.
    Agree 100%. It's fashionable to say the Packers have a deep corps of WR's. The truth is they used to. In 2011 our starters were Jennings, Driver and Finley at TE. Jordy was a part-time starter with Jones and Cobb on the bench. Now that is a deep corps of receivers.

    In the last few years we've lost Jennings, Driver, Jones and Finley. We've replaced them with...Boykin, Davante Adams, Janis and Richard Rodgers. That's a downgrade by anybody's calculation.

    Jordy and Cobb are our starters. Cobb is a natural slot receiver and Jordy our natural downfield threat. Cobb is quick not fast. He's forced into a position of going downfield which is not his strength.

    Seriously, the braintrust needs to get Adams and especially Janis into the picture ASAP. Adams is Jones-like. Janis is Jordy-like. We need their help now.

    As for TE's? We should probably let them stay occupied blocking. None of them show any stand-out receiving ability.
    One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
    John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

  8. #8
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    Agree 100%. It's fashionable to say the Packers have a deep corps of WR's. The truth is they used to. In 2011 our starters were Jennings, Driver and Finley at TE. Jordy was a part-time starter with Jones and Cobb on the bench. Now that is a deep corps of receivers.

    In the last few years we've lost Jennings, Driver, Jones and Finley. We've replaced them with...Boykin, Davante Adams, Janis and Richard Rodgers. That's a downgrade by anybody's calculation.

    Jordy and Cobb are our starters. Cobb is a natural slot receiver and Jordy our natural downfield threat. Cobb is quick not fast. He's forced into a position of going downfield which is not his strength.

    Seriously, the braintrust needs to get Adams and especially Janis into the picture ASAP. Adams is Jones-like. Janis is Jordy-like. We need their help now.

    As for TE's? We should probably let them stay occupied blocking. None of them show any stand-out receiving ability.
    Are you trollin' again? Because I don't want to embarrass myself by agreeing with you

    Harlan, I'm pretty sure you are! Pretty rose coloured glasses talking about Jones' productive seasons, he is second probably only to Bush in hate spewed at him for inconsistent performances and missed opportunities!

    Jones' career year is a push when compared to Cobb's second season. The only number that is better, the TDs, is an outlier, Jones' second best total there is half that.
    Code:
    2012 	Jones 	16 	64 	784 	12.3 	14
    2012    Cobb 	15 	80 	954 	11.9 	8
    You can't compare Cobb to Jones or Jennings, he plays a vastly different role in the Pack's offense. He is the successor to Driver's X role, he's shifty and quick, and fearless going over the middle. Driver was crazy durable, which is one thing Cobb has not been so far.

    We'll see if Adams and Janis provide depth. Adams is off to a good start, Janis we haven't seen yet, but he was a 7th round pick so he's expected to take more time to have an impact. Boykin seems like a bottom of the roster guy who will be churned out.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  9. #9
    M
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    Agree 100%. It's fashionable to say the Packers have a deep corps of WR's. The truth is they used to. In 2011 our starters were Jennings, Driver and Finley at TE. Jordy was a part-time starter with Jones and Cobb on the bench. Now that is a deep corps of receivers.

    In the last few years we've lost Jennings, Driver, Jones and Finley. We've replaced them with...Boykin, Davante Adams, Janis and Richard Rodgers. That's a downgrade by anybody's calculation.

    Jordy and Cobb are our starters. Cobb is a natural slot receiver and Jordy our natural downfield threat. Cobb is quick not fast. He's forced into a position of going downfield which is not his strength.

    Seriously, the braintrust needs to get Adams and especially Janis into the picture ASAP. Adams is Jones-like. Janis is Jordy-like. We need their help now.

    As for TE's? We should probably let them stay occupied blocking. None of them show any stand-out receiving ability.
    I'm with you up to your last point. I think the new kid might have the receiving skills.

  10. #10
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    Agree 100%. It's fashionable to say the Packers have a deep corps of WR's. The truth is they used to. In 2011 our starters were Jennings, Driver and Finley at TE. Jordy was a part-time starter with Jones and Cobb on the bench. Now that is a deep corps of receivers.

    In the last few years we've lost Jennings, Driver, Jones and Finley. We've replaced them with...Boykin, Davante Adams, Janis and Richard Rodgers. That's a downgrade by anybody's calculation.

    Jordy and Cobb are our starters. Cobb is a natural slot receiver and Jordy our natural downfield threat. Cobb is quick not fast. He's forced into a position of going downfield which is not his strength.

    Seriously, the braintrust needs to get Adams and especially Janis into the picture ASAP. Adams is Jones-like. Janis is Jordy-like. We need their help now.

    As for TE's? We should probably let them stay occupied blocking. None of them show any stand-out receiving ability.
    Especially if Sherrod is still starting.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    Agree 100%. It's fashionable to say the Packers have a deep corps of WR's. The truth is they used to. In 2011 our starters were Jennings, Driver and Finley at TE. Jordy was a part-time starter with Jones and Cobb on the bench. Now that is a deep corps of receivers.

    In the last few years we've lost Jennings, Driver, Jones and Finley. We've replaced them with...Boykin, Davante Adams, Janis and Richard Rodgers. That's a downgrade by anybody's calculation.

    Jordy and Cobb are our starters. Cobb is a natural slot receiver and Jordy our natural downfield threat. Cobb is quick not fast. He's forced into a position of going downfield which is not his strength.

    Seriously, the braintrust needs to get Adams and especially Janis into the picture ASAP. Adams is Jones-like. Janis is Jordy-like. We need their help now.

    As for TE's? We should probably let them stay occupied blocking. None of them show any stand-out receiving ability.
    This all sounds about right.

    I look at a slot WR as the #3 WR. They often are not able to get off jams, and may not have excellent downfield speed.

    Jerry Rice was not big. He was fast enough, althougth not a burner. I knew Jerry Rice. He was a friend of mine. You Randall Cobb are not Jerry Rice. (I only mention Rice because Cobb's limitations are not just size or even speed.)

    I'm laying down the gauntlet for Cobb. I hate because I love. Show me you are more than a guy this year.

  12. #12
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    I kinda see Randall Cobb as a good #3. He's not as good as Jennings at getting open. James Jones was more productive.

    Cobb is a good returner. A nice utility player. He can run out of backfield, but is no Reggie Bush.

    My memory of Cobb's career is fuzzy. Has he shown enough to suspect he'll develop into a strong #1 or #2?
    SEASON TEAM GP REC TGTS YDS AVG LNG TD FD FUM LST
    2011
    • GB
    15 25 31 375 15.0 61 1 15 0 0
    2012
    • GB
    15 80 104 954 11.9 39 8 45 0 0
    2013
    • GB
    6 31 46 433 14.0 48 4 18 0 0

    In the past he's been a solid reciever. Definitely one of the better slot recievers in the NFL.

    He's going to need a lot of catches to get pro bowler type numbers though. So far this season he hasn't been near what he was in 2012 IMO. The last two weeks he has been failing to get separation from linebackers and failing to make anything happen after the catch.

    I'd say Jennings > Cobb > Jones
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    I'd say Jennings > Cobb > Jones
    I had real boner for Jones after his great season - was that last year or year before when he lead league in TDs?

    Cobb hasn't sent a tingle up my leg for a very long time - maybe his injury last year pushed his great plays into distant memory.

  14. #14
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    I had real boner for Jones after his great season - was that last year or year before when he lead league in TDs?

    Cobb hasn't sent a tingle up my leg for a very long time - maybe his injury last year pushed his great plays into distant memory.
    The market reception Jones got should tell you all you need to know. Cobb is just a much more desireable mold.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  15. #15
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    I had real boner for Jones after his great season - was that last year or year before when he lead league in TDs?

    Cobb hasn't sent a tingle up my leg for a very long time - maybe his injury last year pushed his great plays into distant memory.
    Maybe you forgot your Viagra.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  16. #16
    Senior Rat HOFer Carolina_Packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3,384
    I think Cobb is special, and I think as the year goes on, his opportunities will come. I think Jordy just has the hot hand, and why wouldn't you keep feeding him?
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

  17. #17
    Senior Rat HOFer Bossman641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    6,051
    I hope the best is yet to come this year because so far he's not creating a ton of separation or much yac.
    Go PACK

  18. #18
    Drowned Rat HOFer denverYooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,573
    Quote Originally Posted by Bossman641 View Post
    I hope the best is yet to come this year because so far he's not creating a ton of separation or much yac.
    He's getting enough separation when they're in the red zone.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  19. #19
    Jennings at his best was better than Cobb right now. I think Jones is closer to Boykin than Cobb.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    Jennings at his best was better than Cobb right now. I think Jones is closer to Boykin than Cobb.
    Boykin looked like Jones on some plays last year - strong, good body control, some big catches. But Jones had a season where he made big plays week after week.

    Jones is over the hill now.

    I'm confused by Cobb, I'm really unsure what kind of season he will turn in. He did look like Percy Harvin in flashes in the past. Haven't seen one of those flashes for a while.

    What has Cobb done as a rusher?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •