Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 102

Thread: Official Packers/Vikings Discussion Thread Week 5

  1. #21
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Favored by 9? I'd bet on the Vikings to cover that. Nothing has come easy for the Packers this season and I don't like the matchup.

    Edit: apparently Chewy says we'll win by 30+
    Last edited by 3irty1; 10-01-2014 at 01:20 PM.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    Favored by 9? I'd bet on the Vikings to cover that. Nothing has come easy for the Packers this season and I don't like the matchup.

    Edit: apparently Chewy says we'll win by 30+
    I totally agree, it's either going to be close or it's going to be a blowout.

  3. #23
    Green & Gold Shades Rat HOFer channtheman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    5,669
    Quote Originally Posted by hoosier View Post
    I totally agree, it's either going to be close or it's going to be a blowout.
    Yeah. I'd even wager that the Packers will either win or lose.

  4. #24
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Quote Originally Posted by channtheman View Post
    Yeah. I'd even wager that the Packers will either win or lose.
    God lets hope so. Ties are like kissing your sister.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  5. #25
    Green & Gold Shades Rat HOFer channtheman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    5,669
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    God lets hope so. Ties are like kissing your sister.
    Was it the Viqueens we tied last year?

  6. #26
    Hands-to-the-face Rat HOFer 3irty1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,853
    Quote Originally Posted by channtheman View Post
    Was it the Viqueens we tied last year?
    Yup
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

  7. #27
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.

    As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.
    wist

  8. #28
    I think the Packers win this fairly easily only because I think Ponder will start. Stubby supposedly has said this week that he needs to start using Starks more. We will see about that, he will probably stick with his predictable game plans until the day he's fired.

  9. #29
    Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 2h2 hours ago
    For #Vikings vs. #Packers, Greenway and Rudolph are out. Bridgewater was limited participation and is questionable.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  10. #30
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,496
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig View Post
    That's like saying they are the Muskie Queen.
    You're gettin' on the fightin' side of me if you're dissing the Musky Queen.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  11. #31
    Ryan Wood ‏@ByRyanWood 3h3 hours ago
    #Packers injury report:
    Barrington doubtful
    Boyd doubtful
    Boykin out
    Jones probable
    Lang (no injury)probable
    Matthews probable
    Neal probable
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  12. #32
    Senior Rat HOFer Maxie the Taxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Loon Lake, Florida
    Posts
    9,287
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Ryan Wood ‏@ByRyanWood 3h3 hours ago
    #Packers injury report:
    Barrington doubtful
    Boyd doubtful
    Boykin out
    Jones probable
    Lang (no injury)probable
    Matthews probable
    Neal probable
    That means Pennell and Janis will probably be activated again.
    One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
    John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    That means Pennell and Janis will probably be activated again.
    Interesting insight. Any thoughts on whether Tolzien will be active?

  14. #34
    I'm sorry, that was unnecessary roughness against a senior citizen.

  15. #35
    Stubby made a statement today that Boykin's injury is worse than they originally thought.

  16. #36
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    You're gettin' on the fightin' side of me if you're dissing the Musky Queen.


    60 pounder!! Nice fish.
    wist

  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.

    As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.

    I hope they keep reeling like this. 550+ yards of offense last game. As for Bridgewater. they are playing the gametime decision but I think they forgot to tell Teddy to play along. He talked about how much fun it will be to play tomorrow in such a historic stadium. Sure didn't sound like an "if I play". I suppose that in itself could be a ruse.

  18. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.

    As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.
    Are you feeling ok? You almost sound......... Optimistic?

  19. #39
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by George Cumby View Post
    Are you feeling ok? You almost sound......... Optimistic?
    I grade on a different scale of the rest of you guys I guess... I fully expect we should beat a lesser team like the Vikings - no offense Rastak

    If Bridgewater plays?? He's a rookie, i.e. he'll be big-time up and down... long term he may be the answer for the Vikes, but this season is going to be a big learning curve; and if Ponder starts - Ponder is Ponder.

    We got waxed by 2 teams that I consider to be better than us - Seattle and Detroit; and we beat a bad Jets team, and looked terrible on defense beating an about even team in the Bears.

    If Peterson were playing?? I don't think the line would be 9, and I don't think we'd cover 9, but given the circumstances - yes, we should cover. Even with dunderdummy preening his spraypainted hair in the coaches booth
    wist

  20. #40
    Senior Rat HOFer Maxie the Taxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Loon Lake, Florida
    Posts
    9,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    I'm sorry, that was unnecessary roughness against a senior citizen.
    That's a 15 yard penalty, whippersnapper.
    One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
    John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •