Jason Wilde @jasonjwilde 1m1 minute ago
#Packers' points vs. number of plays is an anomaly. #Patriots have #NFL-high 357 points on 757 plays. Packers with 354 points on 663 plays.
Jason Wilde @jasonjwilde 1m1 minute ago
#Packers' points vs. number of plays is an anomaly. #Patriots have #NFL-high 357 points on 757 plays. Packers with 354 points on 663 plays.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Packer Report @PackerReport · 19m 19 minutes ago
MM on Lacy being ill: Aware before the game. "Fighting through a GI illness." Still monitoring.
hopefully not too closely.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Field cameras.Originally Posted by mraynrand
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
So what game plan are we thinking the Patriots are going to come with? Their game plans vary as much as any team in the league.
Are they going to go with the power run like they did against Indy? Or more of a spread it out and try to get it to Gronk on a LB?
Go PACK
I would imagine you'd run on one of the league's worst run defenses. Once they're softened up, you bomb them with Gronk and friends.
"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
The answer to your question is yes.
They'll have their way with dunderdummy - complete mismatch in terms of coaching.
I wish I owned every Patriot in fanstasy this week.
wist
They are going to run until the Packers stop it. They will want to avoid the sub defense so they can pass effectively as well.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Like dunderdummy has any intention whatsoever of covering anybody??
Whether we are in base, nickel, or dime... dunderdummy will let receivers run wide open all over the field - it's what he does.
Did you see that easy 16 yd pitch and catch from Bridgewater to Rudolph?? Dunderdummy was playing man on the WR's and zone underneath. Rudolph was given a free release and simply ran an out pattern to the space vacated by the WR who carried Shields with him downfield - the defender playing zone underneath stayed in his zone, and Rudolph caught the ball without a single Packer with 10 yds of him - that's the brilliance of dunderdummy.
That's Pop Warner stuff - yet dunderdummy does crap like that all the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pats won't afford us the same courtesy - they'll cover everyone short tight and make Rodgers hold the ball.
Talentwise - I think we can win this game; coaching on the other hand... we're way outclassed.
wist
Are you talking about the first play of the game where Rudolph ran an out to the left? That was man across the board. Hawk's coverage was awful though, which explains why Capers went to Jones.
Go PACK
No, it was late in the game... you could see the WR run the clear out, and nobody was assigned to cover outside the hash. Rudolph could have pitched a tent and put up neon signs, and no Packer was going to give him a second thought b/c dunderdummy didn't account for that patch of turf at all.
The mess at ILB is almost entirely on TT, although I'm sure dunderdummy and MM signed off and said we were okay there. Still, dunderdummy does so many things that are unsound, that it compounds the mess we have at ILB.
wist
So not a broken coverage. Not a player error. He leaves zones in his zone defense unoccupied? This is your contention?
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I read a lot of McGinn's stuff and one thing he has bee harping on all year is that the Packers were going to take Shazier or Mosley if they were available. I know he writes some dumb articles but he is normally pretty well connected with the draft. I obviously can't prove it, but my sense from him is that the Packers favored those players over HHCD.
Go PACK
I would be totally fine if I never saw Hawk or Jones on the field again - except maybe at alumni day.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
If you are Hoody Genius don't you stick Revis on Jordy all day long. Cobb still doesn't naturally get open. Adams will be important this game. If Revis shadows Nelson this might be a game where we REALLY miss having a TE who is worth a shit.
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
Let them single cover JN....they will pay.
C.H.U.D.
He ha been putting Revis on the 2nd best receiver and leaving him on an island. Than he doubles the best guy. You might single up Cobb at the risk of your own sanity if you don't get pressure and Cobb shakes free late.
The argument I see against that is in single coverage, Nelson is going to get a step deep and Rodgers will throw the ball. Do you want to take that risk? On the road my guess is they do not.
Last edited by pbmax; 11-26-2014 at 08:45 AM.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Agree. Revis is still a very good CB but no longer the "shutdown the other team's #1 guy" CB
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
I think he will put Revis on Cobb and then have Browner press Nelson with safety help over the top. Browner can play on the LOS but once a WR gets a step on him it's over.
Go PACK
Packer Report @PackerReport 2m2 minutes ago
Asked belichick about Rodgers and Brady. Said they like to think they are good golfers
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Not sure either D will fully slow down either O. Instant classic - 38-35 Pack
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
