Blitz and make Brady uncomfortable. Even if it means giving up a big one. On offense go four wides and make them go "dime"
Blitz and make Brady uncomfortable. Even if it means giving up a big one. On offense go four wides and make them go "dime"
Seeing we have no chance with our shitty defense I say we should forfeit the game and wait for Atlanta so we can beat up on another lousy team instead.
and if we do beat NE lets give Dom all of the credit in the world for finding a way to stop an offense which should score an infinite amount of points on us. It's not like he hasn't made any adjustments that have been great for the team after the bye.....has he ??? I think he's a very average defensive coordinator. It's not like he's Vanilla Bob.Originally Posted by Pugger
It would be an interesting poll to see if most in here view Dom as
Domgenius
Domderdummy
Or just an average DC in here.
POLLMAKERS..................can you set this puppy up ?????????????????//
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
You are a pollmaker.
Pollster, heal thyself.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Just a thought on defending the Pats : I assume the Pack will be in a lot of nickel & dime for this game - and Gronkowski seems to be the key. Therefore, I would put a lot of responsibility on Williams & Shields - along with Ha Ha & either Hayward or Burnett- to handle the outside receivers & slot. I'd line up Hyde directly across from Gronk on the line of scrimmage with instructions to bump him right away, then peel back. I would station Burnett or Hayward 3 yards behind Hyde at the snap. His job would be to re-bump Gronk, still within the magic 5 yards. Hyde would now be right back in the area for coverage.
If the D Line can generate any kind of pressure, Brady then must rely on options other than Gronk - which would work more to the Pack's favor.
And yes - if we can't stop the run - or cover the other receivers - all will be for naught.
Who Knows? The Shadow knows!
Interested to see what Blount brings - if he can stay out of Bellicheck's doghouse that long.
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Perry and Bush still out. Only Saturday practice left to prove their available. Davante Adams hurt his heel in practice but continued to go.
Sitton and Lang have both practiced. By process of elimination, Bostick has practiced.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packe...1.html#packers
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Does it make anyone feel better about the Packers because the Packers O line is apparently several steps better (even when injured) that the Dallas Cowboys O line?
Because it should.
Normally being better than Dallas is no great shakes. But everyone who was anyone thought their O line was noteworthy. And the Eagles just abused it.
Two weeks after the Packers ate their lunch. Eagles were away for both games.
Last edited by pbmax; 11-28-2014 at 09:41 AM.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Ultimately, it's in the trenches. Just look at what's happened to SF without a great O-line and loss of players in their defensive front 7.
As bizarre as it might seem for the haters, Packers desperately need Perry back and healthy.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Yep, blocking and tackling. Blocking and tackling.
I've always thought Perry could be a player - his problem has been in how he's been used since he's been here, i.e. dunderdummy.
Now this year he is finally be used with his hand in the dirt, and all of a sudden he's showing flashes of being player?? Go figure...
If Perry does indeed miss this game, I think that will probably seal our fate. If Perry is out, dunderdummy will almost certainly run very little or no 3-3, and will be thrilled to run 2-4 the whole game. Brady will devour the 2-4, and dunderdummy will be thrilled to hold the Patriots to gains of 15 yds/play.
Dunderdummy has stated openly how much of a pussy he is, i.e. that elite QB's must not be challenged in any way. He will be content to sit back and let Brady pick us apart all day long... we've seen this movie many times.
wist
Yes. We should definitely ignore the entire Chcago game.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
So let me get this straight... you'd rather give up 150+ yds/game on the ground, and leave receivers running unmolested and uncovered all over the field?? To stick to your (and dunderdummy's) beloved 2-4, you'd rather have that, than put a 3-3 on the field like we had against Chicago??
I'm beginning to think that you are dunderdummy's 'mini-me'.
wist
Yes, it is no coincidence that our D improved with Perry as an OLB and Clay inside.
I don't know what was up with the Dallas line in that game. I feel like that is more of the outlier than the norm, so don't get too excited.
I agree... the Cowboys OL just had a bad game. There is no comparison between the Dallas OL and ours... they are lightyears better.
wist
Really???
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...alse&Submit=Go
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...alse&Submit=Go
I don't know what your point is... I don't think even the most homey homers on here would argue that our OL is anywhere in the same league as the Cowboys.
They can run the ball - they do run the ball; and we cannot. The only way we can run the ball is by using the pass to set up the run... the Cowboys are good enough that they don't have to do that, they can simply line up and run it down your throat more often than not... they just had a bad game yesterday.
Our OL is there to pass block... anything that gets accomplished in the running game is an afterthought. They're not knee-benders at all, there's no pulling or trapping - we have 3 running plays, and that's it.
If we had Dallas's OL, and the Vikings defense?? We'd be in business
wist
obviously people are comparing the performances of GB and Dallas O-line versus Philly's D. The thing is, it isn;t just the lines of course, it's the lines plus the QB*. And Rodgers is so vastly superior to Romo that he will make a line look better. (I didn't get a chance to see the Dallas game, so I don't know how bad the line versus Romo played in that game)
*and RBs, but that's probably a wash or slight advantage to Lacy.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Using these assumptions, please explain the end of the Vikings game please. Specifically, the last 3:32.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote