So...trying to get back on topic.......

One of the good things we can take from the loss in Buffalo is that our Running Game was turning out and especially evident early in that game. There has been some argument as to why MM didn't simply lean more on the run when it became obvious that Aaron Rodgers and the Passing Offense was struggling. Yea sure......Mike McCarthy had to save Eddie Lacy from any more serious injury but..... he has other RB's dressed (James Starks and DuJuan Harris).

IMO MM tossed that game double bent on Aaron Rodgers and the passing game eventually coming through. How many times have we witnessed MM aborting on a solid running game and that decision lending heavily on the outcome being failure? Be honest with yourself.

So switching up and going forward to the final two games in the regular schedule and then the playoff's. Just how important is that fine running game that MM might lean on?


http://www.tsn.ca/video/otr-what-hap...-back-1.151061

Dec. 3, 2014

TSN and Off The Record: What happened to the workhorse running back?

Marshall Faulk, Eric Dickerson and Andre Reed join Michael Landsberg on location at CIBC's Miracle Day Event and discuss how the running back position has changed in the NFL.



I'll toss this into the post. I believe that we do win the final two games and end up with the NO. 2 Seed. Is that a good thing?:

http://www.tsn.ca/video/otr-irvin-ex...mbeau-1.146848

OTR: Michael Irvin explains why it is hard to play at Lambeau

Irvin also shares his most awkward interview moment; how he would handle Richard Sherman and more.

GO PACK GO !