I'd like to know how strong the correlation between the rule change in 2006 and the decrease in fumbles. Is that decrease likely to have occurred without a significant external factor, or highly improbable?Originally Posted by pbmax
I'd like to know how strong the correlation between the rule change in 2006 and the decrease in fumbles. Is that decrease likely to have occurred without a significant external factor, or highly improbable?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...tball-testing/
Goodell press conference includes surprising answer about football testing
Posted by Mike Florio on January 31, 2015, 1:07 PM EST
" ...Asked at the Friday press conference by Mike Reiss of ESPNBoston.com regarding whether halftime testing has occurred in the past, Commissioner Roger Goodell provided a surprising response.
“I don’t know the answer to that question,” Goodell said. “That would be something, I presume, that Ted Wells would look into and will provide that information.” ..."
Comment woodbuck27:
This man is paid $ 40 M $ / Year to not know the answer to a question he should know the answer to?
** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Yes, because the CEO of a multi-billion dollar industry should know if the balls are checked at halftime.
But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Yes, because the CEO of a multi-billion dollar industry should know if the balls are checked at halftime.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Exactly.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote