My analysis says the $15 M$ /season would satisfy Ndamukong Suh .

Even if TT wanted him that cost would 'only' be fantasy at best. TT has to put his marbles into retaining his own FA's.

How attractive is this problem child-adult?

He's lived up to his billing out of College. He's a reliable (overall) dominant force for a DL that has other pieces. Suh has to be accounted for by opposing teams. In five seasons since he was chosen second overall by Detroit in 2010:

He's had 241 TT's, 36 SACKS 15 PD's, 2 FF's and 1 Pick in 78 games. He's a dominant/aggressive man upfront and center. The Lions run 'D' is going to suffer the impending loss of Ndamukong Suh.

It seems pretty clear that his marketing strategy is based on moving his life closer to home. Seattle has a lot of factors to consider as priorities before entertaining anyone in Free Agency. It's obvious that that organization isn't afraid to swing for the fence. Seattle will bite the dead cap bullet in the future for being enamoured over Percy Harvin. It appears to me that if they can get it done the same lost gamble won't occur signing Ndamukong Suh.

Seattle should have won the Super Bowl past. Why not double down with SUH in 2016? Two straight Super Bowls was maybe? a changed offensive call away. Two Super Bowls in three seasons would be redemption.