Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 65

Thread: ODE TO TED---TOP 10 HITS and TOP 10 MISSES

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
    The Packers really need to hire you. You already know he's going to be terrible. Wow. You ought to be an NFL GM.
    No shit, huh, lol...

    He's a midget, misses tons of tackles, takes bad angles...

    By TT's way of evaluating though - those things mean nothing. All TT cares about is that he can run (which he can), and he can play the ball in the air (which he can).

    So, we're going to be stuck with watching this midget bounce off of Alshon Jeffrey, Calvin Johnson, and Kevin White - it is what it is.

    I saw very little on tape that would warrant a 1st round pick - more like a 5th rounder. He's 185 lbs soaking wet...
    wist

  2. #2
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    So, we're going to be stuck with watching this midget bounce off of Alshon Jeffrey, Calvin Johnson, and Kevin White
    That's a penalty!
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  3. #3
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post

    I saw very little on tape that would warrant a 1st round pick - more like a 5th rounder. He's 185 lbs soaking wet...
    And Waynes is one inch taller and 1 pound heavier. So why did he go earlier? Because he can run, faster than Randall. And some of his angles look like crap on tape - when you're trying to find flaws. Try and get your story straight, guy. You always fall into the same trap - you have such vested interests in proving your negative viewpoints that you ignore straight up facts and/or make absurd, contradictory arguments.

    By the way, the league doesn't agree with you. No one is drafting 'thumper' corners because, guess what, the rules have changed. You miss that one maybe?
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post

    I saw very little on tape that would warrant a 1st round pick - more like a 5th rounder. He's 185 lbs soaking wet...
    I couldn't find much video on the web. Do you gave links to the video you watched?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  5. #5
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    I couldn't find much video on the web. Do you gave links to the video you watched?
    I stumbled onto a couple of yahoo's who seemed to be living in their moms basement, lol... nerds that had no life.

    But they had a lot of tape of Randall, and played it back in forth trying to evaluate him. Unfortunately I was watching it on my TV - which cut out, and when I got it back I couldn't find it again... I only originally found it after chasing a search down a rabbit hole. I'll try to find it again, b/c that was the most footage I found on Randall. Everything else was just highlight nonsense that didn't show much.
    wist

  6. #6
    Junior Rat Rookie dahammer001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    somewhere in Dallas,Texas
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    No shit, huh, lol...

    He's a midget, misses tons of tackles, takes bad angles...

    By TT's way of evaluating though - those things mean nothing. All TT cares about is that he can run (which he can), and he can play the ball in the air (which he can).

    So, we're going to be stuck with watching this midget bounce off of Alshon Jeffrey, Calvin Johnson, and Kevin White - it is what it is.

    I saw very little on tape that would warrant a 1st round pick - more like a 5th rounder. He's 185 lbs soaking wet...
    I agree with your analysis

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    I would add Damarious Randall to the misses list... it's official - terrible pick.
    Bump!!
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  8. #8
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Bump!!
    He's soft... still don't want him. You guys like soft players, TT likes soft players, and the Packers are a soft team... I'm stuck with the lot of you

    TT being a LB in the league once upon a time, you'd think he'd like tough football players, but given a choice between a soft player and a tough player, he'll take the soft player every time. I don't get it... I guess he likes to see his teams get their asses kicked year after year in the playoffs against much tougher teams.

    To make matters worse, we're not even the best team in our division anymore... and yes, Minnesota is a much tougher football than Ted's ballarinas.
    wist

  9. #9
    Senior Rat HOFer Carolina_Packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3,384
    Back to Bretsky's original point of the thread, I like the supplemental lists of hits that posters provided.

    If you look at the JS Online list, http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packe...301633121.html my take-away from the worst 10 picks list is that there is a distinct difference between busting out because of injury vs. someone who couldn't play at the NFL level.

    Injury list=Justin Harrell, Derek Sherrod, Jerel Worthy, Kyrhi Thornton, Abdul Hodge, Alex Green

    Stiffs=Brian Brohm, Pat Lee, Cory Rodgers, Jerron McMillian

    By my count that's 6 injuries to 4 stiffs. I know ultimately a bust is a bust whether because of injury or because the guy isn't NFL-caliber. I think it's unfair to hang the bust label on a guy who gets injured and isn't able to play, or gets injured, comes back, but ultimately can not play. Was that because of the injury or injuries? Hard to know for sure. How should that hang on the GM? Sometimes it's just bad luck.

    TT must own the guys on the stiffs list, but shouldn't for the guys on the injury list. If you need to put Thornton on the stiffs list because his hamstring injury seemed a bit like a "red-shirt" year, I'll give you that one. He was over-drafted whether injured or not. Brohm was a system guy at Louisville, like drafting a Mike Leach QB from his spread system. Highly productive, but it doesn't necessarily transfer to the next level. Pat Lee and Jerron McMillian looked lost. Cory Rodgers was obviously fool's gold. The Niners had him in after the Packers and he lasted 3 weeks on their practice squad. Then he went to the CFL, had a small amount of production in two seasons and by 2009 was done. To me, Cory Rodgers (not Justin Harrell) is TT's biggest bust, because he was hyped, wasn't injured and never made it on the roster after being drafted in the 4th round. Ouch!

    All GM's miss, but I think you must discount the misses due to injury. Sure, the guys who got injured may have never been All-Pro, but it's hard enough to play the sport, let alone having to deal with either catastrophic or nagging injuries. TT has done an exceptional job of building a complete roster. He doesn't necessarily draft big name guys, with obvious notable exceptions, or ones that some fans know the best coming out of college, but most of the time, the ones he drafts/signs that ultimately make the roster, can play.
    Last edited by Carolina_Packer; 05-08-2016 at 07:01 AM.
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

  10. #10
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    He's soft... still don't want him. You guys like soft players, TT likes soft players, and the Packers are a soft team... I'm stuck with the lot of you

    TT being a LB in the league once upon a time, you'd think he'd like tough football players, but given a choice between a soft player and a tough player, he'll take the soft player every time. I don't get it... I guess he likes to see his teams get their asses kicked year after year in the playoffs against much tougher teams.

    To make matters worse, we're not even the best team in our division anymore... and yes, Minnesota is a much tougher football than Ted's ballarinas.
    Ironically, the soft defense dominated the top NFL offense in the playoffs. But you don't really care about facts, do you.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    Ironically, the soft defense dominated the top NFL offense in the playoffs. But you don't really care about facts, do you.
    You could say that Randall's brain failed him in an important way in OT. Its obvious and I knew it long ago that T2 loves dumb, athletic players.

    He has now over-corrected now with his 2016 draft of valedictorians. But too late to help Rodgers. All is lost, we can only wait for someone clearly better like Eliot Wolf to take charge.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  12. #12
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    Ironically, the soft defense dominated the top NFL offense in the playoffs. But you don't really care about facts, do you.
    Always said I like a lot of the players, especially in the front seven since TT decided defense was an actual part of the game... Most of our defensive problems of late are b/c of dunderdummy.

    And when the game is on the line, we get crap like that 2 play, 45 second drive that ended our season.

    Don't you think that some blame should be assessed when you only win 2 SB's in the span of 25 years, all the while rostering 2 HOF QB's?? Something's wrong with that picture... but it's good enough for you guys. Not for me.

    I want to win championships.
    wist

  13. #13
    Legendary Rat HOFer vince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    God's Country
    Posts
    5,363
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    He's soft... still don't want him. You guys like soft players, TT likes soft players, and the Packers are a soft team... I'm stuck with the lot of you

    TT being a LB in the league once upon a time, you'd think he'd like tough football players, but given a choice between a soft player and a tough player, he'll take the soft player every time. I don't get it... I guess he likes to see his teams get their asses kicked year after year in the playoffs against much tougher teams.

    To make matters worse, we're not even the best team in our division anymore... and yes, Minnesota is a much tougher football than Ted's ballarinas.
    And here's the tough guy you like.
    http://www.buffalobills.com/video/vi...5-1867e40d9c30

    And how about that ankle bite at about 1:50... ?

  14. #14
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Quote Originally Posted by vince View Post
    And here's the tough guy you like.
    http://www.buffalobills.com/video/vi...5-1867e40d9c30

    And how about that ankle bite at about 1:50... ?
    ...and he pushed the guy out of bounds at about 1:25 , another criticism of GB's "softy" .

    Looked like he might have slid off a tackle just before that, but help came.

    All in one game!!

  15. #15
    Skeptical Rat HOFer wist43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,777
    Quote Originally Posted by vince View Post
    And here's the tough guy you like.
    http://www.buffalobills.com/video/vi...5-1867e40d9c30

    And how about that ankle bite at about 1:50... ?
    lol... he's taking the outside away dummy - do you understand angles?? Leverage?? Duh...
    wist

  16. #16
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Quote Originally Posted by wist43 View Post
    He's soft... still don't want him. You guys like soft players, TT likes soft players, and the Packers are a soft team... I'm stuck with the lot of you
    Yes, I've noticed that, too. So often TT and many on here downgrade players because they just aren't soft enough.

    You have an opinion that Randall is soft. Many of us do not believe that he is soft. He did not seem to play soft at all last year, from what I recall, and I don't understand why you continue in your argument that he is soft. I'm getting old and forgetful, but I don't recall a single play when I got frustrated with him for lack of a physical approach to the play, as I so often did with Tramon Williams and do at times with Sam Shields. Randall may not be a physical specimen at CB, so may not make stunningly physical plays frequently, but that doesn't mean he plays soft, in my opinion.

  17. #17
    Wist and (to a lesser extent?) red are so certain that he'll suck that I feel much better about the pick.

    Thanks for your service. guys!

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by smuggler View Post
    Wist and (to a lesser extent?) red are so certain that he'll suck that I feel much better about the pick.

    Thanks for your service. guys!
    he might turn into something decent in a couple years or 3, but our team is set up to win now with just a couple added pieces

    almost everything you read on the guys says its gonna take time with him, but he should be able to set in on nickle and dime situations early and contribute on special teams

    thats not what you want out of a first rounder IMO, that sounds more like a later round pick

  19. #19
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    he might turn into something decent in a couple years or 3, but our team is set up to win now with just a couple added pieces

    almost everything you read on the guys says its gonna take time with him, but he should be able to set in on nickle and dime situations early and contribute on special teams

    thats not what you want out of a first rounder IMO, that sounds more like a later round pick
    By all accounts Sam Shields was a total moron coming in his first year. How'd that turn out? Ya think maybe the Packer organization has some confidence in their ability to get raw guys prepared and on the field? That's kinda their modus operandi, isn't it? Not a lot of old fellas on the Packers.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    he might turn into something decent in a couple years or 3, but our team is set up to win now with just a couple added pieces

    almost everything you read on the guys says its gonna take time with him, but he should be able to set in on nickle and dime situations early and contribute on special teams

    thats not what you want out of a first rounder IMO, that sounds more like a later round pick
    I haven't read that at all. The Packers needed a cover guy for the dime, general depth and an influx of talent. This is that guy.

    He won't start, Hayward and Shields will. He needs to play nickel and dime. Outside of maybe Waynes, I don't think there was a CB getting drafted this year that is going to unseat Hayward.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •