Results 1 to 20 of 78

Thread: Jake Ryan, 2015 Fourth Round Pick

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
    I heard pundits saying that the Saints reached for Anthony at 31. What do you think?
    well, at worst he was a second rounder. so at pick #30, i wouldn't have had a problem with it. the guy we took, was more of a reach in most peoples mind, then anthony was

    i honestly, would have been fine with anthony, kendricks, perryman or mckinny at pick #30

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    well, at worst he was a second rounder. so at pick #30, i wouldn't have had a problem with it. the guy we took, was more of a reach in most peoples mind, then anthony was

    i honestly, would have been fine with anthony, kendricks, perryman or mckinny at pick #30
    Not really. Almost all of the rankings that I saw had Randall higher.

    CBS had Randall at #37 and Anthony at #72.
    Scouts Inc. had Randall #38 and Anthony at #50.
    USA Today had Randall #36 and Anthony at #43.
    Kiper had Randall at #31 and Anthony at #57.
    McGinn had Randall mocked going #20 and Anthony not in the first round.
    Last edited by HarveyWallbangers; 05-05-2015 at 09:31 PM.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    Not really. Almost all of the rankings that I saw had Randall higher.

    CBS had Randall at #37 and Anthony at #72.
    Scouts Inc. had Randall #38 and Anthony at #50.
    USA Today had Randall #36 and Anthony at #43.
    Kiper had Randall at #31 and Anthony at #57.
    McGinn had Randall mocked going #20 and Anthony not in the first round.
    yeah, when you look at "big boards" he's usually ranked higher the anthony. however guys like kendricks and perryman were also usually ranked higher then randall

    i looked at mocks more then big boads, and many if not most of the mocks i saw had anthony going before randall

    also, it wasn't until the last week before the draft that randall started to shoot up big boards, i wonder what the reasons for that was? what changed?

  4. #4
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,707
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    also, it wasn't until the last week before the draft that randall started to shoot up big boards, i wonder what the reasons for that was? what changed?
    I read one article that said teams have had him there for a long time, it just took a while for the media (what we see) to catch on.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    also, it wasn't until the last week before the draft that randall started to shoot up big boards, i wonder what the reasons for that was? what changed?
    That's been mentioned before. Rocketing up the draft boards is draft-nik speak for we just found out teams like this player much more than we do. Teams don't begin to put their board together until a month to go before the draft. Any talk about a board in Jan/Feb/most of March is baloney.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    the guy we took, was more of a reach in most peoples mind, then anthony was
    This is pretty much overtly untrue if most media scouting is to be believed. I have not seen one big board posted where Anthony was ranked ahead of Randall. Clearly Green Bay felt Randall was at least an equal to Anthony, or they would have drafted Anthony or another from the field.

  7. #7
    Senior Rat HOFer Carolina_Packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3,384
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    well, at worst he was a second rounder. so at pick #30, i wouldn't have had a problem with it. the guy we took, was more of a reach in most peoples mind, then anthony was

    i honestly, would have been fine with anthony, kendricks, perryman or mckinny at pick #30
    I was expecting ILB in either rounds 1 or 2 as well. When they picked Randall at 30, I was sure they would get an ILB in the 2nd, but with the run on the top-shelf guys, and most likely TT's reluctance to move up and get one, it was not meant to be. Picking Dawson at the end of the 2nd just to get an ILB would have been a reach. I'm guessing Joe Thomas and Carl Bradford are looking impressive enough as ILB prospects for TT to have uttered that phrase you so love.
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •