Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
Nice Article...well it's offseason..at least it's entertaining

Completely agree on the TE spot

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...this-offseason
The TE spot is the only point where I might agree. There was no need to sign Daniels yet. Mentioning Hayward is just strange. The title of the Article is 4 Moves Green Bay Packers Should Have Made This Offseason, but then the writer points out that the injury situation is probably why he hasn't been signed. The comments on Hundley were equally strange.
At the time, the move seemed shrewd. The Packers seemed likely to carry two quarterbacks behind Aaron Rodgers again this season, and Hundley is a prospect whom head coach Mike McCarthy could develop in his offseason quarterback school.

But trading up for Hundley handcuffed the Packers in some ways, too. Because of the investment, he is virtually a lock to make the 53-man roster. However, he's currently last on the depth chart.
Aaron Rodgers was probably last on the depth chart after his first minicamp.

A lot of people on Packerrats could write a better article than this.