Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
The science only showed that they could possibly have naturally deflated. You know this right? Science doesn't disprove that there was an intentional effort on the part of Brady and NE to go outside the rules and change the inflation to suit them. And 'Narrative' is a nice euphemism for 'inculpatory evidence'
Huh? How could the gas law prove that the Pats didn't deflate them? It can't prove that negative, what it did was show there was a way other than actually letting the air out to get to a lower pressure than the refs set them to.

Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
People have go to jail without any concrete evidence all the time. Saying that it is circumstantial does not prove your point.
There's something humorous (and correct) in the statement that my saying it's all circumstantial proves nothing

I think you misunderstand me in thinking that I'm defending Brady or making any judgment that he did or didn't do anything. What I think is that the NFL had a little kangaroo court, and now it's been exposed.