Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Russell Wilson Gets Paid

  1. #1

    Russell Wilson Gets Paid

    Peter King ‏@SI_PeterKing 9m9 minutes ago
    Russell Wilson and the Seahawks have agreed to a 4-year, $87.6-million extension, per source.

    Peter King ‏@SI_PeterKing 8m8 minutes ago
    The new Wilson deal includes a $31-million signing bonus, with approximately $60-million guaranteed.

    Peter King ‏@SI_PeterKing 5m5 minutes ago
    The deal averages $21.9-miilion a year, a smidge less than top deal in football, Aaron Rodgers’ $22-million per.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  2. #2
    Rodgers > Wilson. Seahawks will have to be creative to keep all their players. Congratulations to Russell though...his great-great-grandkids should be set for life, assuming he doesn't spend it all on hookers and coke.

  3. #3
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    I think Wilson played this about as well as he could. Seattle really had him over the barrel.

    Hard to tell yet if he got 'elite' money. If it's an extension, he's under contract for 5 more years. Adding on this coming year's $1.5M, it's a 5 year $89.1M deal, which is $17.8M, well below the 20ish that would put him in that category.

    edit: just saw confirmation at PFT that it is an extension, so Seattle can officially implement a Soviet style 5 year plan.
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ear-extension/
    Last edited by Guiness; 07-31-2015 at 11:21 AM.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  4. #4
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,106
    Well, it seems good for both sides, but at least Seattle is now paying for its QB play. Now let's see how they manage the cap.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  5. #5
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
    Well, it seems good for both sides, but at least Seattle is now paying for its QB play. Now let's see how they manage the cap.
    Until now, they have been somewhat sloppy with their cap, and it hasn't hurt them very much. The same types of mistakes now will hurt them, because core players with big contracts will limit their flexibility to overcome the mistakes. Maybe they were sloppy because they knew they could be, and they will manage a maturing roster well. We will soon see.

  6. #6
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Patler View Post
    Until now, they have been somewhat sloppy with their cap, and it hasn't hurt them very much. The same types of mistakes now will hurt them, because core players with big contracts will limit their flexibility to overcome the mistakes. Maybe they were sloppy because they knew they could be, and they will manage a maturing roster well. We will soon see.
    It's already started.

    Seahawks cut Tony McDaniel, a DT who started 29 of 32 regular season games (appearing in all 32). Don't know who he is, but I suspect he's one of the fat guys in the middle who kept the guards off Wagner so he could run around. He was due $2.5M in base, and would've counted about $3.6M against the cap. Have to think this is a pure cap move.
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...tony-mcdaniel/

    Two other guys looking for more money, too. Bennett won't get a cent, but Chancellor's behavior is interesting. 3 years left on him contract, so seemingly no leverage, but Thomas is out, and he might be worth it.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  7. #7
    I am certain this number is not accurate on a year to year basis, but it does convey some sense of how much the Seahawks have spent this offseason.

    Seachickens went from 3 players in double digits, to 10 earning more than 10 mil per year. $97.38 mil per year tied up in 10 players.


    Scroll down to Stat of the Week: http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2015/08/02/n...olina-panthers
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  8. #8
    Superstar Roster Strategy - Seahawks follow a path trailblazed by the Packers?

    http://overthecap.com/the-seahawks-s...gy/#more-10427

    http://overthecap.com/examining-top-...yer-contracts/
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  9. #9
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,682
    For comparison, the Packers this year are at about $84 mil for their top 10 cap hits. The difference can be two or threes pretty good starters.

  10. #10
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,682
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Superstar Roster Strategy - Seahawks follow a path trailblazed by the Packers?

    http://overthecap.com/the-seahawks-s...gy/#more-10427

    http://overthecap.com/examining-top-...yer-contracts/
    When you have Brett Favre followed by Rodgers, it might be that way by default, but the Packers next level of players near the top few salaries for their positions has been thin. Antonio Freeman was for a year or so, White, maybe Sharper? now Matthews. Instead, they try to keep a large core of players in the range of about 5 to 15 for their position. Their better O-line and receivers much of the time have fallen in that range.

  11. #11
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,106
    As a side note from Detroit, the GM Mayhew is trying to negotiate new contracts for Andre Levy and Ngata. Levy is, in my mind, a superb player. Not the greatest pass rusher, but he can cover guys, he can create turnovers, both fumbles and INT's, and he is a wrecking crew against the run. They got him on a cheap deal (about three mill a year, I think) last time, but now he'll cost more. I believe he's 29 years old. And I wonder if they'll give Ngata a longer contract, which I imagine at his age he'd like.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •