Yeah god don't you hate when women whine about sexual assault? Your interpretation of the situation is great man. I'm not miserable, just pointing out the obvious double standard. U prefer to deny that, your choice, chump.
Yeah god don't you hate when women whine about sexual assault? Your interpretation of the situation is great man. I'm not miserable, just pointing out the obvious double standard. U prefer to deny that, your choice, chump.
Disgusting.
Dennis and Callahan @DandCShow 3h3 hours ago
I was just told by a current ESPN anchor that all ESPN employees were told not to report or discuss the Daily News story on Peyton Manning.
Much of what is in the document has previously been discussed. But this seems a piece with coverage so far. Its not being picked up in a lot of places.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
It was trending like crazy on Facebook for a while...for whatever that's worth. There was an interesting response on FOX Sports by this guy, who writes like a fanboy.
http://www.foxsports.com/college-foo...brigade-021316
Either way, if there are legal documents out there, I'd think they speak for themselves. Hoax or no, I certainly wouldn't want any woman I know -- whether family, friend, colleague -- to be treated this way.
Everybody does dumb stuff in college, but I think there are limits.
Travis' piece would be more convincing if he didn't believe (despite the target's affidavit otherwise) that the mooning wasn't directed at another player, but at the trainer.
The mooning of another player narrative came up when the trainer tried to get it to blow over. Manning repeated a version of it in his book.
It would also be more believable if Travis could explain why a simple mooning incident cost the University $300,000 to settle (from the Daily Beast article linked), why Maning sought to trash her reputation and why he had to pay her again in 2003 and might have had to pay her again in 2005 (don't have any details other than another lawsuit was filed due to an appearance on ESPN).As to the question of to whom Manning wanted to show his ass, Malcolm Saxon, a track and field athlete who was in the room during the incident, wrote a letter to Manning to say that no, he was not the intended moon-ee (as Manning had written in his book), imploring him to “maintain some dignity and admit to what happened… Your celebrity doesn’t mean you can treat folks that way… Do the right thing here.”
I have seen a LOT of mooning in my life (probably more than is responsibly admitted). It cost no one dining privileges and north of $300,000. And two lawsuits.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...x-scandal.html
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Sue me!
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
I wonder of the lost wages insurance that colleges allow undergrads/schools to purchase includes umbrella coverage for assault or defamation?
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I wonder if Nationwide is on Peyton's side
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Now my balls are in your face.Originally Posted by mraynrand
Manning scrotum tastes so good
^^^^ That was so off color, I printed it with color off. Highlight it if you're desperately curious....
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Joke so good I clap this hard
Last edited by pbmax; 02-15-2016 at 12:37 PM.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
dp
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Unsettlingly appropriate after mraynrand's joke.
But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Broadband fiber ain't all its cracked up to be. Between the delay in posting and somehow the laptop auto correcting the hand clap emoji to a smiley face emoji clap, it was a weird time, believe me. dp almost doesn't cover the level of possession my computer was under.
Maybe the government is editing me as I type rather than auto correct.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
More leaks:
Manning's filing in 2002 for Summary Judgement/Dismissal: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...famation-case/
She circumstantial evidence that the redacted portion of Trainers 2002 filing had to do with Academic fraud: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...cademic-fraud/
Interesting decision, possible error:
Critical witness not deposed by Manning's team in 2002: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ed-under-oath/
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
ESPN has handed its reporting to people who won't have to ask the League embarrassing questions while promoting upcoming games. They discovered a report from a Crisis Center that recorded Naughright reporting the Manning incident the day it happened.
Outside The Lines: http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/...-1996-incident
http://espn.go.com/pdf/2016/0222/esp...isiscenter.pdf
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...y-of-incident/The document shows one of five boxes checked for describing the incident: “Adult sexual assault.” The document doesn’t name Manning, but refers generally to a “very well known public figure.”
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
So, what the heck is going on with this thing? I mean, what's the end game to all this? Is something that happened over a decade ago now being brought up due to Manning winning a SB?
I'm just a little lost as to why the big hubbub right now.
All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!
Taking the King down a peg is my guess. Why this didn't happen in 2006, after his first SB win, is a fair question though.
Could be an attempt to get his side to say something dumb and open themselves up to another suit. But won't know that until it all plays out.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
If you can't suppress bad news about a Dear Leader, you quietly release it while he is on parade after a glorious victory in battle. The rabble is much more accepting at that moment and the frivolities of youth are carefully rationalized away with a chuckle, a knowing nod and a facial expression etched with just the right amount of chagrin and remorse. "boys will be boys" Tomorrow comes, the sun rises, and only the memory of victory and celebration remains. The king has been purified by glory.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote