The APB

[Harlan Huckleby]

I have no opinion on APB's fate but I do think its out of bounds to dump shade on KY. His grievance is as legit as any other. He's not running a witch hunt here, APB is a known witch. If accusations are going to be leveled at KY to indicate some kind of equivalence, put up the proof. My bet is the record on KY shows nothing but years of measured posting in good faith.

The poor good fellow. He starts a thread in the Packer forum accusing another member of revealing personal information about Peter Griffin. Rather than just laugh at this nonsense, you call this behavior a "legitimate grievance.". You have no opinion about tank's fate except to say he is a permanent witch.

I truly don't dislike KY beyond his Tank witch hunt. And yes it is an endless obsession. He deserves the shade he casts upon himself with this endless trolling. BTW, why was this stupid thread not moved like other such threads?

PS. If you don't like Tank or me or anybody else, I don't mind you saying so. It is probably good to let people know they are annoying. I prefer to ignore people who annoy me.

[3irty1]

The poor good fellow. He starts a thread in the Packer forum accusing another member of revealing personal information about Peter Griffin. Rather than just laugh at this nonsense, you call this behavior a "legitimate grievance.". You have no opinion about tank's fate except to say he is a permanent witch.

I truly don't dislike KY beyond his Tank witch hunt. And yes it is an endless obsession. He deserves the shade he casts upon himself with this endless trolling. BTW, why was this stupid thread not moved like other such threads?

PS. If you don't like Tank or me or anybody else, I don't mind you saying so. It is probably good to let people know they are annoying. I prefer to ignore people who annoy me.

The humorous Peter Griffin mistake notwithstanding, any new evidence isn't relevant because a new ban isn't relevant. The question isn't whether to ban him or not, its to pardon him or not. He's already banned and KY made it clear he is asking for the existing ban(s) to be enforced. This is a legitimate grievance supported by forum rules and can not honestly be described as trolling. The only reason Tank is posting now is a sort of unofficial, self-served, pseudo probation born of his creating a new account.

I am indifferent as to whether Tank is pardoned or not. And as unpopular of an opinion as it might be I like you although I think you're being unfair to KY for what's effectively expediting a decision on Tank's most recent incarnation.

[Harlan Huckleby]

This is a legitimate grievance supported by forum rules and can not honestly be described as trolling.

"forum rules" - heee heee heee. The only rules are the rush of chemicals in Madtown's head on any given day. There aren't any consistently enforced rules.

Tank's crime is that he annoys some people. IT's that simple. I've broken the "rules" many times, including having two accounts once, but Mad laughs it off because I am a sufficiently entertaining ant in his ant farm. Tank was not banned because of rules, he isn't allowed to post here now because of rules. He gets banned when Madtown feels like it is best to please the people raising pitchforks. KY has been ragging on Tank for three years running. If there were actual rules, uniformly enforced, then the "just legalities" argument would be true. This is a pissing contest, and some people have a strong and endless flow, despite aging prostates.

[3irty1]

"forum rules" - heee heee heee. The only rules are the rush of chemicals in Madtown's head on any given day. There aren't any consistently enforced rules.

Tank's crime is that he annoys some people. IT's that simple. I've broken the "rules" many times, including having two accounts once, but Mad laughs it off because I am a sufficiently entertaining ant in his ant farm. Tank was not banned because of rules, he isn't allowed to post here now because of rules. He gets banned when Madtown feels like it is best to please the people raising pitchforks. KY has been ragging on Tank for three years running. If there were actual rules, uniformly enforced, then the "just legalities" argument would be true. This is a pissing contest, and some people have a strong and endless flow, despite aging prostates.

Given your account of the management system here its even more understandable for KY to "raise pitchfork" in pursuit of Tank's exile as that is the justice system.

In my experience enforcement of the rules has been remarkably consistent if graded on a curve with other forums. Mad's a hands off dictator for the most part but bans are always prefaced with a logical progression of warning shots and reserved for only the most egregious offenders. His laziness is in phase with the natural ebb and flow of the forum such that we rarely endure multiple cancers at a time. Should we all start agreeing with each other he'll show mercy and unleash a plague of the forgiven on us lest the pot grow stagnant.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

"forum rules" - heee heee heee. The only rules are the rush of chemicals in Madtown's head on any given day. There aren't any consistently enforced rules.

Tank's crime is that he annoys some people. IT's that simple. I've broken the "rules" many times, including having two accounts once, but Mad laughs it off because I am a sufficiently entertaining ant in his ant farm. Tank was not banned because of rules, he isn't allowed to post here now because of rules. He gets banned when Madtown feels like it is best to please the people raising pitchforks. KY has been ragging on Tank for three years running. If there were actual rules, uniformly enforced, then the "just legalities" argument would be true. This is a pissing contest, and some people have a strong and endless flow, despite aging prostates.

Well said.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

The only reason Tank is posting now is a sort of unofficial, self-served, pseudo probation born of his creating a new account.

This is actually my original Packerrats account. Join date: 2006.

I am a man, so I will admit I made mutiple accounts way back in, I think, 2007. That's why this account got banned in the first place. Had I not forgotten the password to this account and knew Mad reinstated it, I woulda used this one all along in my Napoleon Bonapartic returns. Was going through some old emails a while ago; found an old email I sent to myself, which contained confidential info 'bout this account.

Pretty sure Mad allowed a couple of other exiled posters to return.

As for Kentucky and his crusade against me, it's mostly one-sided. I don't know what his problem with me is, but I don't have a problem with him. If we ever attended a Packer game together, at his expense o/c, and he bitch-slapped me, I'd be more than happy turning the other cheek.