Page 4 of 28 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 553

Thread: Official 2017 NFL draft thread

  1. #61
    Moose Rat HOFer woodbuck27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,498
    I would love to see a solid RB in our backfield.

    Can you imagine the Packers Offense with a man like this:
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

  2. #62
    He's probably more 3rd or 4th round than 1st, but I'd like to see the Packers get Joe Mixon of Oklahoma.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    He's probably more 3rd or 4th round than 1st, but I'd like to see the Packers get Joe Mixon of Oklahoma.
    Mixon has all kinds of baggage; he has all kinds of talent but I think TT and Co. red flag him. I like his backfield mate Perine a lot though.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYChH34dBuc

    they way people talk about him, he can bench press a car
    http://www.soonersports.com/ViewArti...CLID=210262415
    Last edited by run pMc; 12-03-2016 at 05:57 PM.

  4. #64
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,548
    Packers pick now between 14-18.

  5. #65
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,178
    I could see us winning out though, and making the playoffs. The offense is starting to gel. Randall and Rollins are plugging the secondary hole. The ILBs are healthy again. We might just pull this thing out and get another shitty late draft pick.

  6. #66
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,548
    Quote Originally Posted by JustinHarrell View Post
    I could see us winning out though, and making the playoffs. The offense is starting to gel. Randall and Rollins are plugging the secondary hole. The ILBs are healthy again. We might just pull this thing out and get another shitty late draft pick.
    Could be. I think Martinez started to practice this week. If they can get him and Matthews healthy, the defense could be pretty decent.

  7. #67
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,178
    Lions have Bears (division games are always tough), Giants, Cowboys (very tough team) and the Packers to finish the season.

    I could see the Lions losing 3 games of their last four.

  8. #68
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,564
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by JustinHarrell View Post
    I could see us winning out though, and making the playoffs. The offense is starting to gel. Randall and Rollins are plugging the secondary hole. The ILBs are healthy again. We might just pull this thing out and get another shitty late draft pick.
    The Seattle game will be interesting
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  9. #69
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
    The Seattle game will be interesting
    That's a good team. If the Packers win, we can get excited again. Lose and the playoffs are a stretch. It's a very big week coming up.

    It's been a tough year with injuries and so many young players in important spots.

    If we can't beat this team, it's ok. We could use a playmaker in the draft. An early d1, 2 and 3 could really help us. But if we win, we have a shot still now. So I'm ok either way. This is a talented young roster. We still have a 5 year window.

  10. #70
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,548
    Seahawks are probably the 2nd best team in the NFC. I think it's an upset if the Packers win next week, even at home.

  11. #71
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,564
    Blog Entries
    2
    huge upset ...although....Seattle seems to occasionally take a game off.......they were lights out today so hopefully they don't come out strong next week
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  12. #72
    Opa Rat HOFer Freak Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Land of the midnight sun
    Posts
    15,405
    Seattle should destroy the defense. The Packer offense should be able to score but they probably can't keep up with the Chickens.
    C.H.U.D.

  13. #73
    Seattle wins by 3 TDs or more. That is a very good team.

  14. #74
    You all should be banned for two days for dumping a Seattle bandwagon hijack job into red's draft thread.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  15. #75
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,548
    More or less the draft order.

    W L T PCT HOME ROAD DIV CONF PF PA DIFF STRK
    Cleveland Browns 0 12 0 .000 0-6 0-6 0-4 0-8 197 352 -155 L12
    San Francisco 49ers 1 11 0 .083 1-5 0-6 1-3 1-8 234 370 -136 L11
    Jacksonville Jaguars 2 10 0 .167 1-5 1-5 1-2 1-8 224 313 -89 L7
    Chicago Bears 3 9 0 .250 3-3 0-6 2-1 3-5 204 270 -66 W1
    New York Jets 3 8 0 .273 1-4 2-4 1-2 3-5 196 266 -70 L3
    Carolina Panthers 4 8 0 .333 3-3 1-5 1-3 4-5 283 321 -38 L2
    Los Angeles Rams 4 8 0 .333 1-4 3-4 2-1 3-5 180 262 -82 L3
    Cincinnati Bengals 4 7 1 .375 3-2-1 1-5 1-2 3-5 245 259 -14 W1
    New Orleans Saints 5 7 0 .417 3-4 2-3 1-2 4-4 347 335 +12 L1
    San Diego Chargers 5 7 0 .417 3-3 2-4 1-3 4-5 334 319 +15 L1
    Philadelphia Eagles 5 7 0 .417 4-1 1-6 0-3 3-6 268 245 +23 L3
    Indianapolis Colts 5 6 0 .455 3-3 2-3 2-2 3-5 270 301 -31 L1
    Arizona Cardinals 5 6 1 .458 4-2-1 1-4 2-1-1 4-4-1 276 251 +25 W1
    Houston Texans 6 6 0 .500 5-1 1-5 3-0 4-4 207 257 -50 L3
    Minnesota Vikings 6 6 0 .500 4-2 2-4 1-3 4-6 233 209 +24 L2
    Green Bay Packers 6 6 0 .500 4-2 2-4 2-1 4-4 295 302 -7 W2
    Tennessee Titans 6 6 0 .500 3-3 3-3 1-3 3-5 308 296 +12 W1
    Buffalo Bills 6 6 0 .500 3-2 3-4 1-3 3-5 305 274 +31 L1
    Washington Redskins 6 5 1 .542 4-2 2-3-1 2-2 4-4 303 295 +8 L2
    Baltimore Ravens 7 5 0 .583 5-2 2-3 4-0 7-2 256 207 +49 W2
    Atlanta Falcons 7 5 0 .583 3-3 4-2 3-1 5-3 386 331 +55 L1
    Tampa Bay Buccaneers 7 5 0 .583 2-4 5-1 2-1 5-3 277 285 -8 W4
    Miami Dolphins 7 5 0 .583 5-1 2-4 2-1 5-4 255 278 -23 L1
    Pittsburgh Steelers 7 5 0 .583 4-2 3-3 2-1 5-3 290 236 +54 W3
    Detroit Lions 8 4 0 .667 5-1 3-3 2-2 6-2 275 251 +24 W4
    New York Giants 8 4 0 .667 5-1 3-3 2-1 5-3 245 237 +8 L1
    Denver Broncos 8 4 0 .667 4-2 4-2 1-3 5-3 286 229 +57 W1
    Seattle Seahawks 8 3 1 .708 6-0 2-3-1 1-1-1 4-3-1 264 194 +70 W1
    Kansas City Chiefs 9 3 0 .750 4-1 5-2 3-0 6-2 281 242 +39 W2
    Oakland Raiders 10 2 0 .833 5-2 5-0 2-1 7-1 345 299 +46 W6
    New England Patriots 10 2 0 .833 4-2 6-0 3-1 7-1 319 207 +112 W3
    x - Dallas Cowboys

  16. #76
    Code:
    			W	L	T	PCT	HOME	ROAD	DIV	CONF	PF	PA	DIFF	STRK
    Cleveland Browns	0	12	0	.000	0-6	0-6	0-4	0-8	197	352	-155	L12
    San Francisco 49ers	1	11	0	.083	1-5	0-6	1-3	1-8	234	370	-136	L11
    Jacksonville Jaguars	2	10	0	.167	1-5	1-5	1-2	1-8	224	313	-89	L7
    Chicago Bears		3	9	0	.250	3-3	0-6	2-1	3-5	204	270	-66	W1
    New York Jets		3	8	0	.273	1-4	2-4	1-2	3-5	196	266	-70	L3
    Carolina Panthers	4	8	0	.333	3-3	1-5	1-3	4-5	283	321	-38	L2
    Los Angeles Rams	4	8	0	.333	1-4	3-4	2-1	3-5	180	262	-82	L3
    Cincinnati Bengals	4	7	1	.375	3-2-1	1-5	1-2	3-5	245	259	-14	W1
    New Orleans Saints	5	7	0	.417	3-4	2-3	1-2	4-4	347	335	+12	L1
    San Diego Chargers	5	7	0	.417	3-3	2-4	1-3	4-5	334	319	+15	L1
    Philadelphia Eagles	5	7	0	.417	4-1	1-6	0-3	3-6	268	245	+23	L3
    Indianapolis Colts	5	6	0	.455	3-3	2-3	2-2	3-5	270	301	-31	L1
    Arizona Cardinals	5	6	1	.458	4-2-1	1-4	2-1-1	4-4-1	276	251	+25	W1
    Houston Texans		6	6	0	.500	5-1	1-5	3-0	4-4	207	257	-50	L3
    Minnesota Vikings	6	6	0	.500	4-2	2-4	1-3	4-6	233	209	+24	L2
    Green Bay Packers	6	6	0	.500	4-2	2-4	2-1	4-4	295	302	-7	W2
    Tennessee Titans	6	6	0	.500	3-3	3-3	1-3	3-5	308	296	+12	W1
    Buffalo Bills		6	6	0	.500	3-2	3-4	1-3	3-5	305	274	+31	L1
    Washington Redskins	6	5	1	.542	4-2	2-3-1	2-2	4-4	303	295	+8	L2
    Baltimore Ravens	7	5	0	.583	5-2	2-3	4-0	7-2	256	207	+49	W2
    Atlanta Falcons		7	5	0	.583	3-3	4-2	3-1	5-3	386	331	+55	L1
    Tampa Bay Buccaneers	7	5	0	.583	2-4	5-1	2-1	5-3	277	285	-8	W4
    Miami Dolphins		7	5	0	.583	5-1	2-4	2-1	5-4	255	278	-23	L1
    Pittsburgh Steelers	7	5	0	.583	4-2	3-3	2-1	5-3	290	236	+54	W3
    Detroit Lions		8	4	0	.667	5-1	3-3	2-2	6-2	275	251	+24	W4
    New York Giants		8	4	0	.667	5-1	3-3	2-1	5-3	245	237	+8	L1
    Denver Broncos		8	4	0	.667	4-2	4-2	1-3	5-3	286	229	+57	W1
    Seattle Seahawks	8	3	1	.708	6-0	2-3-1	1-1-1	4-3-1	264	194	+70	W1
    Kansas City Chiefs	9	3	0	.750	4-1	5-2	3-0	6-2	281	242	+39	W2
    Oakland Raiders		10	2	0	.833	5-2	5-0	2-1	7-1	345	299	+46	W6
    New England Patriots	10	2	0	.833	4-2	6-0	3-1	7-1	319	207	+112	W3
    x -	Dallas Cowboys
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  17. #77
    Oracle Rat HOFer Cheesehead Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ruling the Meadow!
    Posts
    10,785
    I'm getting on board with moving Montgomery to RB full time. That takes care of speed in the backfield and also a big time receiving threat.

    That frees up taking a CB or LB in round 1. The draft seems pretty heavy on first round talent in these positions, especially CB.
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

  18. #78
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig View Post
    I'm getting on board with moving Montgomery to RB full time. That takes care of speed in the backfield and also a big time receiving threat.

    That frees up taking a CB or LB in round 1. The draft seems pretty heavy on first round talent in these positions, especially CB.
    yeah, maybe take a mid round flyer on a bigger back for a backup. but monty would fill the need for a running back in a pass heavy offence nicely. maybe we should design a few plays to get him the ball out of the backfield and turn him into one of those receiving backs thats all the rage these days

  19. #79
    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 49s50 seconds ago
    Asked two high-level evaluators about #LSU RB Leonard Fournette, who intends to enter the draft. As good as Todd Gurley? “Better,” both said
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  20. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 49s50 seconds ago
    Asked two high-level evaluators about #LSU RB Leonard Fournette, who intends to enter the draft. As good as Todd Gurley? “Better,” both said
    i think the wins the last two weeks might have taken us out of the fournette sweepstakes. i've seen him lasting as long as 10 or 11.

    we'll probably be drafting in the early 20's with the pace we're on

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •