Originally Posted by bobblehead
House isn't breaking the bank and isn't being paid to be a starter. Gunter will never step up much more than what he did last year due to lack of speed. Even if there is a #1 pick and Randall and Rollins both play well, there is still room for House as a dime back (Gunter back to ST mainly). Plus CB's are not exactly immune to injury, so you need all the depth you can get (see 2016).
Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!
well...i think unTed has left the building and tt is back. * sigh *
Formally announced:
Michael Cohen @Michael_Cohen13 34m34 minutes ago
#Packers announced the signings of CB Davon House and OLB/special teamer Jordan Tripp.
Tripp was not tendered, but has signed a deal.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Cap Room: http://www.scout.com/nfl/packers/sto...able-cap-space
Keep in mind that with only 57 players under contract (second lowest), they are going to need to sign a bunch of low cost players.
Code:TEAM CNTRACS 2016 CARRYOVER TEAM CAP CAP ROOM San Francisco 49ers 68 $38,708,916 $130,891,350 $78,230,085 Cleveland Browns 71 $50,123,269 $164,546,519 $53,271,360 Tennessee Titans 61 $24,046,522 $146,939,640 $44,939,611 Jacksonville Jaguars 74 $39,314,310 $162,257,853 $44,848,149 Oakland Raiders 58 $8,000,000 $132,518,512 $42,937,363 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 67 $5,330,779 $134,423,726 $39,368,630 Indianapolis Colts 64 $6,614,106 $138,349,907 $37,466,963 New England Patriots 61 $5,292,335 $137,131,806 $36,167,082 Houston Texans 64 $4,935,924 $141,075,383 $33,571,741 Green Bay Packers 57 $7,984,687 $148,607,353 $27,705,823 Cincinnati Bengals 61 $6,578,866 $146,741,901 $27,381,165 Minnesota Vikings 62 $400,184 $145,057,386 $26,638,725 Denver Broncos 68 $7,243,248 $148,265,282 $25,290,916 Chicago Bears 68 $8,103,197 $150,848,707 $24,801,483 New York Jets 74 $371,487 $145,623,124 $22,717,504 Arizona Cardinals 65 $4,405,068 $151,762,911 $21,302,607 Pittsburgh Steelers 77 $3,269,367 $151,262,841 $19,854,218 Buffalo Bills 49 $2,837,222 $150,097,444 $19,630,853 Seattle Seahawks 64 $2,065,865 $151,563,707 $18,783,858 Miami Dolphins 65 $8,363,708 $156,342,416 $18,382,264 Atlanta Falcons 58 $926,541 $155,607,638 $14,539,190 Carolina Panthers 75 $13,208,020 $166,812,972 $14,357,672 Washington Redskins 71 $15,055,131 $168,086,733 $14,218,332 Los Angeles Chargers 68 $113,693 $158,615,218 $13,711,101 Baltimore Ravens 63 $2,553,126 $152,950,996 $13,386,820 New Orleans Saints 66 $5,754,000 $158,836,348 $10,054,475 Dallas Cowboys 66 $2,401,553 $163,129,770 $9,528,479 Detroit Lions 64 $4,725,644 $162,548,027 $8,584,004 Kansas City Chiefs 69 $5,002,168 $166,366,961 $6,525,032 Philadelphia Eagles 71 $7,933,869 $173,338,601 $6,169,661 New York Giants 63 $1,800,000 $164,541,370 $4,415,876 Los Angeles Rams 66 $939,689 $167,907,739 $188,228 AVERAGE $9,141,347 $152,907,817 $24,331,025
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Teams like the Rams, Chargers, and Jets scrape right up against the cap. They really know how to build a winning program.
Zing!!
helloooo unTed! please come baaaaack!
Teams like the Giants, Chiefs, and Cowboys scrape right up against the cap. They really know how to build a winning program.
Last edited by esoxx; 03-16-2017 at 05:51 PM.
Barwin signs with Rams per PFT: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...connor-barwin/
The Rams announced on Thursday that they have signed Barwin. They did not announce the terms of the deal, but Adam Caplan of ESPN reports it is a one-year deal with a maximum value of $6.5 million.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Thanks Ted!
There is a rumor out there that the Packers are signing LaGarrett Blount. Haven't seen it anywhere but heard it reported as a rumor on the radio
Put me in the who cares category here
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
THIS
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
Maybe from here. http://lombardiave.com/2017/03/14/le...n-bay-packers/ Not so much a rumor as a suggestion that it would be a good idea.
He would be an excellent addition to the team. he is a very physical punishing runner. But I doubt this is something TT will do.
At this point I would like to see the Packers look to free agents just as fillers, or one year deals. There is no reason why the Packers can't sign a player like Blount.
Packer Report @PackerReport 32m32 minutes ago
#Packers have lost seven free agents this offseason. Subject to change but might be moving on from Goode, too.
Goode and Chris Michael are the odd men out still.
Anyone else get the sense that Ted didn't like his roster much last year? Or was it that they were so middling they weren't worth paying.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I think Lacy and Jones were meh guys who got paid more than they are worth.
I bet he would have loved to have Tretter and/or Lang back though at a lower cost than what they got from Cleveland and the Loins. When you assume Rodgers is getting a new contract next offseason, you have to plan accordingly. He is probably going to get $25M per.
I read somewhere that the Packers would have made Lang the 5th highest paid guard if they had retained him. I like him, but not at that cost with his injury history and age.
Do you think Gunter, Hawkins and Waters are better than House? IMO he is better than these 3 and will be on the final roster unless Ted takes 3 CBs in the draft next month.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
