Page 9 of 32 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 19 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 651

Thread: Packers' Off Season Moves and 2017 Roster

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    and if tretter is gonna cost a ton (close to what lang would cost), then i would stick with lang
    Lang has a lot more miles on his body than Tretter, and his injuries are chronic - they are not going to go away. Lineman can play well into their 30s though so he might have some years left.

    Tretter on the other hand has not seen the field much and I don't think is injuries are going to nag/linger. Question is does the dreaded 'injury prone' label apply?
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Bill Barnwell's plan of attack in offseason. http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page...-nfl-offseason

    1. Re-sign Cook and Lang. Makes case for Cook, doesn't for Lang.

    2. Re-sign Peppers and DON'T re-sign Perry. Thinks Perry's injury history is more important than last year. But last year is going to net him $10 mil per.

    3. Find a cornerback. Maybe even FA. Correctly predicts House getting released by Jags.

    4. Find another inside linebacker.

    5. Get starting RB like, say, Adrian Peterson.

    Eliminate #5, and I concur completely. And now that I think about it, if we could get Peterson for cheap enough or an incentive-laden enough contract, it might be an interesting risk, considering how he bounced back from that previous knee injury and how he thrived so well on the Vikings, he might just be something really special playing with Aaron Rodgers.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    Eliminate #5, and I concur completely. And now that I think about it, if we could get Peterson for cheap enough or an incentive-laden enough contract, it might be an interesting risk, considering how he bounced back from that previous knee injury and how he thrived so well on the Vikings, he might just be something really special playing with Aaron Rodgers.
    I think AP will do well with whatever new team he ends up with as he is the type to want to prove something. Well as long as said team isn't the Browns.

  4. #4
    i don't see peterson having much if anything left in the tank. he looked very pedestrian against us early this year

    he played 2 full game before he got hurt and he averaged less then 2 yards per carry

    he's 31, and has missed almost 2 full seasons of the last 3

    plus his one full season, 2 seasons ago, he only averaged 4.5 yards per carry, he just had huge numbers because thy gave him the ball 327 times, he probably won't get within 100 carries of that in green bay

    whats left of AP is a far cry from the AP in his prime. i think i would rather roll the dice on fat eddy getting in shape to be honest

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    i think i would rather roll the dice on fat eddy getting in shape to be honest
    I honestly would too...I'm just convinced that Lacy isn't going to want to come back to Green Bay enough to give us a hometown discount, and Ted's too tight to give Lacy market value.
    It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

  6. #6
    I'd be happy with resigning Cook, Perry, Lang or Tretter; signing a FA CB; drafting OLB, another CB, and RB; maybe get a veteran RB (Lacy, Stewart, Peterson, Charles, Murray) if we can get good value. Top priority is getting CB fixed and restocking OLB.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  7. #7
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,174
    The offensive line needs depth especially if Tretter and Lang do not resign. I would think that they would give Barclay a shot at guard, but possibly move Bulaga inside and try Spriggs at Right Tackle.
    Then look for the Packers to snag a couple of linemen no sooner than the middle of the draft.

    Perry is going to cost an awful lot of money. Based on his production on the last 5 years he isn't worth it, but since the 2015 playoffs he has been a difference maker off the edge. I don't put a lot of faith that a guy like Frackrell is ready to start, and Peppers could be signed for a million bucks but he is no longer a difference maker that has to be accounted for by opposing offenses. Jones has also been a disappointment and the fact they can't find a position for him means he should look to move to a 4-3 defensive scheme as an end. The is a more serious situation that to me is more of an issue than cornerback. They have to get players that can consistently disrupt the passing game.

  8. #8
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    The offensive line needs depth especially if Tretter and Lang do not resign. I would think that they would give Barclay a shot at guard, but possibly move Bulaga inside and try Spriggs at Right Tackle.
    Then look for the Packers to snag a couple of linemen no sooner than the middle of the draft.

    Perry is going to cost an awful lot of money. Based on his production on the last 5 years he isn't worth it, but since the 2015 playoffs he has been a difference maker off the edge. I don't put a lot of faith that a guy like Frackrell is ready to start, and Peppers could be signed for a million bucks but he is no longer a difference maker that has to be accounted for by opposing offenses. Jones has also been a disappointment and the fact they can't find a position for him means he should look to move to a 4-3 defensive scheme as an end. The is a more serious situation that to me is more of an issue than cornerback. They have to get players that can consistently disrupt the passing game.
    Right on. Not sure what will happen with Tretter. He might bee back. Perry.... hope it's reasonable.

  9. #9
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    The offensive line needs depth especially if Tretter and Lang do not resign. I would think that they would give Barclay a shot at guard, but possibly move Bulaga inside and try Spriggs at Right Tackle.
    Then look for the Packers to snag a couple of linemen no sooner than the middle of the draft.
    It's what I have been saying for the last couple of days.

  10. #10
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    our o-line is one of our strengths. would be stupid to go backwards there. perry too. jones is playing a new position and from EVERYTHING i've read they liked what he did there. i'll bet he's resigned. if he isn't that will probably be where the first pick goes.

  11. #11
    Tretter has been done in by three serious injuries, but I am not sure he could be called injury prone. He had a freak accident during a fumble drill in offseason camp his rookie year. He got rolled into this year at Atlanta. His other bad injury was in a preseason game, another knee injury.

    Unless those knees are toast, that seems like luck of the draw. So by that logic, I want Tretter signed over Lang. And with Lang having no communication from the team, that still seems to be the Packers way of thinking too. Its not a perfect fit, since if Lang doesn't come back, right guard is wide open.

    Thompson isn't clairvoyant, he played the odds with Sitton and it looked like a good bet when he got hurt this year and Taylor did not washout. I think he is making the same calculation here.

    As for Perry, here are the top DEs by paycheck at SpotTrac:
    Code:
    Rank	Name		AverageSal	ApproxValue
    1	M Wilkerson	$18,000,000	60
    2	O Vernon	$16,000,000	39
    3	J.J. Watt	$14,500,000	88
    4	E Ansah		$12,734,000	32
    5	Cam Jordan	$12,047,000	42
    6	M Bennett	$11,268,750	20
    7	Rob Quinn	$10,750,334	41
    8	Mike Daniels	$10,400,000	27
    9	Cam Heyward	$10,400,000	27
    Approximate Value is from Pro Football Reference and in this list covers first five years of careers since 2008. Nick Perry's approx. value is 16. He got 6 of that last year.

    He might get stupid money (largely dependent on who doesn't sign or get tendered just prior to FA opening) but its not going to be more than $10.7 mil per year unless he is the only one left standing.
    Last edited by pbmax; 02-24-2017 at 12:52 PM.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  12. #12
    Oracle Rat HOFer Cheesehead Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ruling the Meadow!
    Posts
    10,785
    The thing is, there's one team that does have stupid money, Cleveland. It will be real interesting if they go out and just blow the market up on FAs from playoff teams like the Pack.
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig View Post
    The thing is, there's one team that does have stupid money, Cleveland. It will be real interesting if they go out and just blow the market up on FAs from playoff teams like the Pack.
    Yes, but he still isn't first on the list. There are six other guys who have to get signed before he is the first call. And of those, only Ingram is mentioned at DE/OLB as getting tagged.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  14. #14
    Oracle Rat HOFer Cheesehead Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ruling the Meadow!
    Posts
    10,785
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Yes, but he still isn't first on the list. There are six other guys who have to get signed before he is the first call. And of those, only Ingram is mentioned at DE/OLB as getting tagged.
    Yeah, but Cleveland ain't known for going after the list from the top down. They tend to throw a dart and a list and go after that guy.
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

  15. #15
    former director of college scouting for the 9ers just signed with the pack

    Matt Malaspina

    maybe he knows how to find d-linemen and linebackers

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    former director of college scouting for the 9ers just signed with the pack

    Matt Malaspina

    maybe he knows how to find d-linemen and linebackers
    Weird for that to happen in offseason pre-draft. Usually they pay to keep the knowledge in house until after all the shouting is over.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  17. #17
    Don't sell Peppers too short. He reminds me of that country song, "I ain't as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I ever was."

    Unless he's firm on retiring, I hope we can re-sign him for situation player money.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  18. #18
    so it looks like we are officially going to end the 2016 season sitting on 9.5 million in cap space

    can't help but think that maybe if we had spent that money on one or two guys we could have won another lombardi

    oh well, we just have 9.5 million more we can keep kicking down the road for our never ending rebuilding period

    what happened to cutting sitton so we could use that cap space to re sign others?

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    so it looks like we are officially going to end the 2016 season sitting on 9.5 million in cap space

    can't help but think that maybe if we had spent that money on one or two guys we could have won another lombardi

    oh well, we just have 9.5 million more we can keep kicking down the road for our never ending rebuilding period

    what happened to cutting sitton so we could use that cap space to re sign others?
    They have to agree to a deal.

    Remember when you weren't happy with Shields or Cobb's numbers?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  20. #20
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,711
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    They have to agree to a deal.

    Remember when you weren't happy with Shields or Cobb's numbers?
    They may also have been keeping money in reserve in case they wanted to offer contract extensions to guys like Lacy, Tretter or Lang. Injuries would have taken those plans off the table.

    They tried bringing in guys off the scrap heap to help at RB with little success. Corner would have been the other place to try. Doubtful there was much out there. They did sign Bene Benwikere to the practice squad late, but did not activate him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •