a "source with knowledge of the situation" just came out and said the packers were not offering cook more money the they gave bennett. they were offering 6 million a year (with lots of incentives), and bennetts official number will be 7 million per year with no "fluff"
no, who in the world would want everyone else to think the packers were offering more then 7 million for cook?
maybe a certain agent?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ellus-bennett/
First, the source insists that Bennett received three-year, $21 million package, a “clean” $7 million per year arrangement with no incentives or fluff. (The contract eventually will be filed and reported on, so the truth on that specific claim eventually will come out.) The source also says that the most the Packers offered Cook was $6 million per year, and that included incentives.
Packers might not have seen the last of Cook. Bears and Lions are 2 teams reportedly interested.
These threads are funny to read. So much hand wringing.
Or scrotum-grabbing.
"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Demovsky
Former Packers TE Jared Cook's two-year deal with the Raiders is officially $10.6 million. There's another $1.6...
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=210635158991403489160-4
Wow he lost a lot of cash being a dbag.
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.