Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 88

Thread: Packers sign Martellus Bennett

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
    I am surprised; the reason is I thought Bennett was an asshole with character issues. Am I incorrect ??
    What is the speed comparison ? I've always thought Bennett was full of talent but I thought Cook was a no brainer resigning. I expected Cook; got Bennett.....good move.

    By rule I'll applaud any free agent signing by Ted Thompson; normally he's hiding at this time. But I undoubtedly still want a pass rusher or CB who can start.

    Wonder how the contracts will compare up ??
    He's outspoken like his brother, but pretty smart. He'll fit in I think. Not quite happy go lucky as Cook.

    I hope Cook gets the deal he is looking for. He came in, worked hard, delivered even after two injuries. Wish him the best.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack View Post
    He missed 6 for us last year.

    Maybe his career total is 15 games, eh?
    bennett, bennett missed 9 games for his career, this is the bennett thread

  3. #3
    Fried Rat HOFer KYPack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Bluegrass
    Posts
    8,656
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    bennett, bennett missed 9 games for his career, this is the bennett thread
    Errps.

    Yer right, you know?

    We don't run block with TE's much, but Bennett is a consistent blocker.

    Maybe this is a good move.

  4. #4
    Senior Rat HOFer Carolina_Packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3,384
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack View Post
    Errps.

    Yer right, you know?

    We don't run block with TE's much, but Bennett is a consistent blocker.

    Maybe this is a good move.
    Do you think this indicates anything about bringing Lacy back? Richard Rodgers' blocking leaves a lot be desired. Do you think that Bennett's blocking is just a bonus asset, or do you think they plan to run more, and possibly bring back Lacy?

    Oh, and he gets #88 since Monty is becoming a RB.
    Last edited by Carolina_Packer; 03-10-2017 at 07:44 PM.
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

  5. #5
    This is a clear upgrade. Bennett is one of the best TEs in the NFL. Cook is solid and had athleticism that we lacked, but Bennett is clearly a better all around TE. Hopefully, his mouth won't cause issues. I'll be interested in the contract compared to what Cook was asking for.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  6. #6
    Senior Rat HOFer beveaux1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    5,412
    Deal appears to be 3 yr/ 18.45 million. http://www.patspulpit.com/2017/3/10/...en-bay-packers

  7. #7
    Rat Starter Bub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Deep in the Lone Star
    Posts
    171
    That can't be true. Why would he sign for such little money?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Bub View Post
    That can't be true. Why would he sign for such little money?
    Ian Rapoport has changed what he is reporting to 3 years/21 mil.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Packman_26 View Post
    Ian Rapoport has changed what he is reporting to 3 years/21 mil.
    great deal

  10. #10
    Cook is a better deep threat. My strongest memory of Bennett is as big waste with Dallas. He apparently was a lot better with New England, and Cook was an injury problem, so I guess I'll keep an open mind and be hopeful Ted got it right. If this is the only FA pick up, though - basically a trade off with losing Cook, then call me pissed off with Ted - as usual.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  11. #11
    Senior Rat HOFer Bossman641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    6,051
    Demovsky said earlier the Packers got Bennett for less than the deal they were working on cook with
    Go PACK

  12. #12
    Stoner Rat HOFer Brandon494's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    5,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Bossman641 View Post
    Demovsky said earlier the Packers got Bennett for less than the deal they were working on cook with
    Lmao at the team that over pays for Cook.

  13. #13
    Senior Rat HOFer beveaux1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    5,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Bossman641 View Post
    Demovsky said earlier the Packers got Bennett for less than the deal they were working on cook with
    Couple of reports that this was the case. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...k-for-packers/

  14. #14
    Numbers I have seen are 3 years and under 19 million. Very reasonable contract for a two-way TE. Cook was better with pure speed, but Bennett is a better all around player. I think Cook will sign for about as much as Bennett in terms of annual average, which will mean a net push on the comp pick in 2018. I'm sure this was a factor in TT's decision.

  15. #15
    Opa Rat HOFer Freak Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Land of the midnight sun
    Posts
    15,405
    Love this deal. I like Cook but this is an upgrade.
    C.H.U.D.

  16. #16
    Well, well, well. Obviously, this is fake news.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  17. #17
    http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-free-a...lus+bennett%22

    Bennett also had the highest passer rating when targeted of any player with 70-plus targets last season (136.8).
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  18. #18
    Jason Wilde @jasonjwilde 2h2 hours ago
    Source said tonight that #Packers were ready to pay Jared Cook more than what they gave Martellus Bennett, as @RobDemovsky heard, too.


    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  19. #19
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    so it's 3 and $21. no way TT offered Cook more than that.

  20. #20
    Senior Rat All-Pro oldbutnotdeadyet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    I am not sure
    Posts
    1,961
    Yeah, I think the important thing to note is we have all been bitching about TT not doing anything in free agency, so he finally signs somebody and some folks are still bitching about it. Just saying...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •