Results 1 to 20 of 37

Thread: Another TE signed named Lance Kendricks

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    see, i was just thinking the opposite

    do we now completely ditch the run game and go with the all out pass attack?

    we got a legit catching TE's and dick rod didn't do too bad last year monty at RB who is really a WR, jordy, adams, cobb (if we now don't cut him to fix the defense), geronimo, and davis

    a-rod might now have more weapons then any packer QB ever

    i think TT needs to adjust the playbook some now to get the TE's more involved

  2. #2
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,632
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    see, i was just thinking the opposite

    do we now completely ditch the run game and go with the all out pass attack?

    we got a legit catching TE's and dick rod didn't do too bad last year monty at RB who is really a WR, jordy, adams, cobb (if we now don't cut him to fix the defense), geronimo, and davis

    a-rod might now have more weapons then any packer QB ever

    i think TT needs to adjust the playbook some now to get the TE's more involved
    Maybe MM is intending to utilize cobb and monty correctly by lining up with 3WR, TE and cobb/monty. If D plays nickel put TE as FB and cobb/monty at RB and run. If they go base you split them and pass....RUN AND SHOOT LIVES!!!
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  3. #3
    Senior Rat HOFer Carolina_Packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3,384
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    Maybe MM is intending to utilize cobb and monty correctly by lining up with 3WR, TE and cobb/monty. If D plays nickel put TE as FB and cobb/monty at RB and run. If they go base you split them and pass....RUN AND SHOOT LIVES!!!
    How about some 12 personnel? With those two tight ends being both pass catchers and blockers, the D wouldn't necessarily know which one (or both) is staying in to block and which one is going out on a route.

    These guys help diversify the offense for sure. If the Packers can make the run game a consistent threat, that will help the defense by moving the chains and winning time of possession.
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    Maybe MM is intending to utilize cobb and monty correctly by lining up with 3WR, TE and cobb/monty. If D plays nickel put TE as FB and cobb/monty at RB and run. If they go base you split them and pass....RUN AND SHOOT LIVES!!!
    What would Mouse Davis say about three TEs?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  5. #5
    Prescient Rat HOFer esoxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,813
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    What would Mouse Davis say about three TEs?
    He'd say we have three too many.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •