Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: RANKING THE PACKERS TOP DRAFT NEEDS

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rat-A-Tat-Tat Veteran BZnDallas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger View Post
    Spriggs is no guard. I think he was drafted because Bulaga is no spring chicken and last season was the first time Bryan missed only a handful of snaps.
    I think Demovsky just put out an article that concurs with your thought process Pugger. Said MM told him Spriggs is the possible future LT of this team and doesn't want to take him away from him learning the tackle position. Went on to agree with other s in the forum that Murphy, Patrick, or Barclay could be the fill in, or a draft pick.
    Now what y'all know about dem Texas boys
    Comin' down in candied toys, smokin' weed and talkin' noise!!!

  2. #2
    Also, if Barclay is Barclay from limited exposure in 2016, then I am even less worried about Guard. It might be fourth on the list.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  3. #3
    Senior Rat All-Pro QBME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    The Flatland
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Barclay is Barclay
    Ugh

  4. #4
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Barclay is a serviceable guard but a dreadful tackle.

  5. #5
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,618
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    Also, if Barclay is Barclay from limited exposure in 2016, then I am even less worried about Guard. It might be fourth on the list.
    I always felt Barclay could play guard better than tackle. Problem is he is an awful tackle and a below average guard.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  6. #6
    Red Devil Rat HOFer gbgary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    up the road from jerrahworld
    Posts
    14,529
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    I always felt Barclay could play guard better than tackle. Problem is he is an awful tackle and a below average guard.
    come oooon...he's gotten better as time has gone along. so did what's his name we all used to rag on. lol...dang it...name is on the tip of my tongue. i hate getting old.

  7. #7
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,618
    Quote Originally Posted by gbgary View Post
    come oooon...he's gotten better as time has gone along. so did what's his name we all used to rag on. lol...dang it...name is on the tip of my tongue. i hate getting old.
    Barclay is bad. I would bet the is the last option to start at guard. It means all other plans fell through. That being said you know what you are getting. He is not a turnstile. He is a solid back up.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •