Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Has Ted Thompson really changed?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Legendary Rat HOFer vince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    God's Country
    Posts
    5,363
    Blog Entries
    6
    They went into the year knowing Montgomery was an available RB, which is why they only kept 2 (plus Monty, 2 on the PS, Ripkowski, Cobb, FA's, etc.). That plan has been confirmed publicly by McCarthy and the fact that Monty has proven to be an able RB supports that plan. Their top 2 guys went down for significant periods, but even with that, the RB position didn't hurt the Packers last season. They were 7th best in the league in Yds./Att.
    Last edited by vince; 05-02-2017 at 11:54 AM.

  2. #2
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,706
    Quote Originally Posted by vince View Post
    They went into the year knowing Montgomery was an available RB, which is why they only kept 2 (plus Monty and 2 on the PS). That plan has been confirmed publicly by McCarthy and the fact that Monty has proven to be an able RB supports that plan.
    Not only that, in Montgomery's limited rookie season they used him in the backfield more and differently than Cobb, and talked about expanding it even more before he was lost for the year. I think this move would have happened regardless, just like the moves of many others from the college positions to their NFL positions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •