Official Week 1 Other Games Thread

[mraynrand]

If you disagree I will never post here again.

It is your call pbmax.[/B]

PLEASE DISAGREE!

[pbmax]

Day 1 Jaguars Fan‏ @HPJArt 2h2 hours ago

allen robinson gets hurt on 1st play. bortles goes over to give support and smacks him ON THE INJURED KNEE

[Rastak]

Who in the 'F' is .... woodblock? I am clearly and have always been woodbuck27.

Demonstrate some decency and deserved respect. Otherwise ... 'F' you and such 'an ignorant smartass' attitude pbmax. I do not deserve such crap.

Do you want to drive another member out of here !?

Hello Woody, hope all is well. You should save your anger for the enemy you guys face today, don't think PB meant anything. Sheesh.....

[woodbuck27]

Hello Woody, hope all is well. You should save your anger for the enemy you guys face today, don't think PB meant anything. Sheesh.....

It isn't anger it is about R.E.S.P.E.C.T. and my contributions and tenure here at Packerrats.

[woodbuck27]

Hello Woody, hope all is well. You should save your anger for the enemy you guys face today, don't think PB meant anything. Sheesh.....

Now to respond to you Rastak:

I am very well. I hope you are as well. Cheers and good luck to your Vikings this season.

[woodbuck27]

It still appears as if the Texans have a QB Issue. With 6:30 left in the 3rd QTR. ** It's 19-7 Jags.

Whoops ! Make that score ** now 26 - 7 Jacksonville.

The Bengals are looking like the Bungles today. Late in the 3rd QTR.... 20 to Zippo 'RAVENS'.

The other early games are 'up for grabs'.

[pbmax]

Don't tell Bretsky, but Watt looks pretty legit versus Joe Thomas. Watt has very heavy and effective hands. I don't even remember seeing them work like that when he was a Badger. But he routinely gets Thomas' hands off him.

Tackles will adjust but its working so far.

He's also had a pick and a late hit penalty.

[Bretsky]

Don't tell Bretsky, but Watt looks pretty legit versus Joe Thomas. Watt has very heavy and effective hands. I don't even remember seeing them work like that when he was a Badger. But he routinely gets Thomas' hands off him.

Tackles will adjust but its working so far.

He's also had a pick and a late hit penalty.

DUDE; WATT IS THE REAL DEAL and don't be surprised if my signature stays for a long long time. He would have been a better pick than King.

[woodbuck27]

DUDE; WATT IS THE REAL DEAL and don't be surprised if my signature stays for a long long time. He would have been a better pick than King.

King wasn't the best choice TT had.

[gbgary]

i think the bears are going to beat atl...nope.

[Rastak]

i think the bears are going to beat atl...

It's down to the last play!

[gbgary]

It's down to the last play!

two drops in the end zone. lol

i guess they still suck.

[mraynrand]

i think the bears are going to beat atl...

Failcons? No!

[pbmax]

And after I went to all the trouble of making him a video to show there was no malice, only technological error.

[woodbuck27]

i think the bears are going to beat atl...

It's 20-17 Falcons with 8 seconds remaining in that game.

Now that game is over and Falcons win 23-17.

[pbmax]

Then perhaps you should consider your approach to the problem woodbuck.

I was going to edit the submission when I saw you point it out, but then your post got ugly kinda fast.

You love to call out other posters for breaches of etiquette, but let's look at your first post on the matter.

Who in the 'F' is .... woodblock? I am clearly and have always been woodbuck27.

Demonstrate some decency and deserved respect. Otherwise ... 'F' you and such 'an ignorant smartass' attitude pbmax. I do not deserve such crap.

Do you want to drive another member out of here !?

First you swear at me. Then you post your username as if I have not used it one thousand times in the past to refer to you. In fact, you seem to forget that normally we co-exist pretty well compared to some others on the board.

Then you demand decency and respect and if I do not reciprocate, you curse me. Elapsed time allowed from error to demand for retraction and insult: 3 minutes.

Rather than consider that this was possibly an innocent mistake you assume its all about my attitude. You then tell me what you deserve.

Then you claim my rudeness drives others out of here.

When I tell you it was simply an auto correct error, you double down and claim I am calling you dumb in the next post.

So my answer to you woodbuck is this: have a lovely day

[mraynrand]

Then perhaps you should consider your approach to the problem woodbuck.

I was going to edit the submission when I saw you point it out, but then your post got ugly kinda fast.

You love to call out other posters for breaches of etiquette, but let's look at your first post on the matter.




First you swear at me. Then you post your username as if I have not used it one thousand times in the past to refer to you. In fact, you seem to forget that normally we co-exist pretty well compared to some others on the board.

Then you demand decency and respect and if I do not reciprocate, you curse me. Elapsed time allowed from error to demand for retraction and insult: 3 minutes.

Rather than consider that this was possibly an innocent mistake you assume its all about my attitude. You then tell me what you deserve.

Then you claim my rudeness drives others out of here.

When I tell you it was simply an auto correct error, you double down and claim I am calling you dumb in the next post.

So my answer to you woodbuck is this: have a lovely day

This is a nice response, but it is disagreeable. Woodblock, carry out your promise!

[woodbuck27]

Then perhaps you should consider your approach to the problem woodbuck.

I was going to edit the submission when I saw you point it out, but then your post got ugly kinda fast.

You love to call out other posters for breaches of etiquette, but let's look at your first post on the matter.




First you swear at me. Then you post your username as if I have not used it one thousand times in the past to refer to you. In fact, you seem to forget that normally we co-exist pretty well compared to some others on the board.

Then you demand decency and respect and if I do not reciprocate, you curse me. Elapsed time allowed from error to demand for retraction and insult: 3 minutes.

Rather than consider that this was possibly an innocent mistake you assume its all about my attitude. You then tell me what you deserve.

Then you claim my rudeness drives others out of here.

When I tell you it was simply an auto correct error, you double down and claim I am calling you dumb in the next post.

So my answer to you woodbuck is this: have a lovely day

"First you swear at me." pbmax

hahaha...You mean the use of this: 'F' ..that stands for a term I use often and that is my invented word 'Frick'.

Trust me I didn't per say 'swear at you' pbmax. That would be a clear disrespect.

"Then you claim my rudeness drives others out of here." pbmax

pbmax...Your mistaken in terms of the implication and people leaving Packerrats; and that in any way is attested to how you personally treat that poster pbmax;AND in my observations and posters coming and going from Packerrats.

pbmax: I've always respected you even when I disagreed with your points of view.

I simply meant that we have lost too many posters 'for whatever reason'. NOT that your manners and anyone drove that poster away.

I have made considerable efforts over the years to endeavour to attract more people to Packerrats; by making Packer fans I have met aware of this Forum.

I never want to see a member leave here for any reason; except for that poster being impossible to deal with. Even that after clear WARNINGS.

[pbmax]

Nice try Bears. Mike Glennon is the 38th best NFL QB. There are retired QBs better than he is.

[mraynrand]

Nice try Bears. Mike Glennon is the 38th best NFL QB. There are retired QBs better than he is.

takes a sack on fourth and goal. Ouch. Thought we could get a cheap loss for ATL. Oh, well.