The remaining problems are running the ball (the best way to get a team out of Cover 2) and the deep ball.
The O line health status doesn't help there.
The remaining problems are running the ball (the best way to get a team out of Cover 2) and the deep ball.
The O line health status doesn't help there.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I think Red assumes(he can feel free to correct me):Originally Posted by pbmax
1. That Stubby has little to do with Rodger's success
2. That if and when Rodgers is permanently gone the Packers would stand pat with current QBs like Hundley as long term starter.
McAdoo does have OBJ who is like Jennings on steroids. They target him a bunch even though defenses do everything they can to take him away. Still he gets the rock less than 1/4 of the time.
If Packers have a talent problem NYG have it in spades. The have OBJ and a lot of crap/inexperience. And Manning may be permanently in the shitter (though his numbers are OK so far this year). But he's such a weird duck - he can play like absolute crap for long stretches and then light on fire. Weird group of guys to coach to be sure.
And I think in any evaluation, talent is the first thing. You can only be moderately successful without it.
Coach and scheme are #2.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Even deeper into the thicket? The Rodgers offense is alive and well.
Here are two stories about the play call for Cook's catch on 3rd down: http://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-p...-aaron-rodgers
And Wilde's take: http://host.madison.com/wsj/sports/f...ed1d3f455.html
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Well, Adams sure looked good today, so IDK. I'm still not sold, but he definitely looked good today.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote