Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
Romo's explanation of that last INT, where it had nothing to do with the WR being open, but confusion between the WR and QB about what to do with the route when there is no safety, was worth whatever they are paying him this year.

Romo says they have a plan for Cover 1 (seam route) and Cover 2, in route, but not for Cover 0.

It was Cover 0, WR stopped to break off route, Cam threw the seam.
Interesting analysis. It reminds me of the end of a certain, sadly unforgettable, playoff game in Philadelphia that had an overtime pick of a Favre throw. After the game Favre said it wasn't really the receiver's (Free?) fault and it wasn't really his fault. There was never any real follow up on that, but now hearing Romo's analysis, I wonder if that is what happened on that play.