Results 1 to 20 of 137

Thread: Put up or Shut up

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Bossman641 View Post
    Lol we're down the top 5 tackles and a starting guard.. and that'd without even addressing the defense. There's not a team in the league that could overcome all that.
    It wouldn't matter. The line is terrible even when it's the starters. But keep making excuses for TT and stubby.

  2. #2
    Senior Rat HOFer Bossman641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    6,051
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    It wouldn't matter. The line is terrible even when it's the starters. But keep making excuses for TT and stubby.
    News flash... it hasn't been the starters. I think you can get by without a stud ol but you need repetition. We've had a different starting 5 every game and have had linemen go down during the games as well. Tough to get any kind of consistency with all that going on.
    Go PACK

  3. #3
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    It wouldn't matter. The line is terrible even when it's the starters. But keep making excuses for TT and stubby.
    Bull. When healthy we have one of the top tackle tandems in the league. Last year our line was ranked in the top 10. Lane Taylor is a find guard and surprised me at tackle when Bahk went down (he ain't Lang but he ain't terrible either). Evans isn't what he once was but is is serviceable. I don't have a problem with the offense. The defense is another issue entirely...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger View Post
    Bull. When healthy we have one of the top tackle tandems in the league. Last year our line was ranked in the top 10. Lane Taylor is a find guard and surprised me at tackle when Bahk went down (he ain't Lang but he ain't terrible either). Evans isn't what he once was but is is serviceable. I don't have a problem with the offense. The defense is another issue entirely...
    I don't think they were top 10 last year in actual football production. Rodgers was hit and sacked more than a lot of other QB's and that was with Sitton yet. TT has screwed with the continuity of the line every few years and it shows. But yeah he's great.

  5. #5
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    I don't think they were top 10 last year in actual football production. Rodgers was hit and sacked more than a lot of other QB's and that was with Sitton yet. TT has screwed with the continuity of the line every few years and it shows. But yeah he's great.
    I think last year they were tops. The year before they were just OK. Sitton was beat up.

    Look around the league. It's not that common for a line to stay the same year over year. Even Dallas' vaunted line had I think two positions change from last year to this year.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  6. #6
    Senior Rat HOFer Bossman641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    6,051
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    I don't think they were top 10 last year in actual football production. Rodgers was hit and sacked more than a lot of other QB's and that was with Sitton yet. TT has screwed with the continuity of the line every few years and it shows. But yeah he's great.
    Sitton wasn't around last year. He was cut at the last minute and taylor replaced him.
    Go PACK

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Bossman641 View Post
    Sitton wasn't around last year. He was cut at the last minute and taylor replaced him.
    Yup, I meant Lang. My point and I've made it before. When you have the crown jewels (Rodgers) you use the best damn safe money can buy to protect them. Plus you make sure there is a decent back up plan should that safe fail. Now granted no one could see the injuries coming. But putting faith in Bulaga and letting Lang walk were mistakes. IMO letting Tretter go was also a mistake. They want to let underperforming overpaid players go, they should have let Clay go.
    Last edited by Rutnstrut; 10-18-2017 at 08:56 PM.

  8. #8
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    Yup, I meant Lang. My point and I've made it before. When you have the crown jewels (Rodgers) you use the best damn safe money can buy to protect them. Plus you make sure there is a decent back up plan should that safe fail. Now granted no one could see the injuries coming. But putting faith in Bulaga and letting Lang walk were mistakes. IMO letting Tretter go was also a mistake. They want to let underperforming overpaid players go, they should have let Clay go.
    Well, they didn't really put faith in Bulaga, they drafted Spriggs and Murphy. You can hold them accountable for that not working out, but not for the injuries.

    I would say that Taylor was a fine replacement for Sitton - until the injury - not only was he playing well at guard, but he did a nice job out at tackle when they were down there.

    Tretter is up and down for the Browns. They are not all that happy with his strength, even at center.

    Lang got tackle money. I just don't think you spend money there with his injury history, but hell, what can I say when everyone is injured? The only guy who isn't is Lang's replacement!
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  9. #9
    Moose Rat HOFer woodbuck27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    Yup, I meant Lang. My point and I've made it before. When you have the crown jewels (Rodgers) you use the best damn safe money can buy to protect them. Plus you make sure there is a decent back up plan should that safe fail. Now granted no one could see the injuries coming. But putting faith in Bulaga and letting Lang walk were mistakes. IMO letting Tretter go was also a mistake. They want to let underperforming overpaid players go, they should have let Clay go.
    T.J. Lang was blocking well yet getting penalized (arguably too much) and not particularly pleased with his start with the Lions and then.... this:

    http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf..._back_inj.html
    Last edited by woodbuck27; 10-19-2017 at 12:39 PM.
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

  10. #10
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    Quote Originally Posted by woodbuck27 View Post
    T.J. Lang was blocking well yet getting penalized (arguably too much) and not particularly pleased with his start with the Lions and then.... this:

    http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf..._back_inj.html
    Did this back issue start while he was playing for us? If so I can see why Ted and company declined to match the offer Lang received from Detroit.

  11. #11
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    It wouldn't matter. The line is terrible even when it's the starters. But keep making excuses for TT and stubby.
    Your problem is that ridiculous statements like this make you unbelievable on the rare occasion you make a good point. Really...starting your 7th best OL at LT and your 8th at LG doesn't matter?

    Last year behind the healthy OL they were 20th in the league in rushing yards, but 8th in Y/A. When you have Rodgers at QB that is very acceptable. When your RB is a converted WR due to injuries its laudable.

    Ur that guy that compares the packers to the team in the league that is #1 at each different thing and bitches that they aren't as good as that team. It reflects poorly.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutnstrut View Post
    It wouldn't matter. The line is terrible even when it's the starters. But keep making excuses for TT and stubby.
    Put up good posts or shut up, please!

  13. #13
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,614
    Quote Originally Posted by smuggler View Post
    Put up good posts or shut up, please!
    repped...just for bagging on rut in a creative way using the threads theme.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •