Mark Murphy is as useless as a hind TIT

[Patler]

Irregardless of whether you like TT or stubby. The title of the thread is pointing out how worthless Mark Murphy is. There is more of an argument for this than against. What exactly does Murphy do? Pretty much nothing.

Actually, unless things have changed dramatically since I grew up on a dairy farm, the title to this thread actually points out the irrational analysis and confusion that fans put into evaluations of front office personnel.

Hind tits on a cow in my days on the farm were anything but worthless. In fact, the hind tits generally produced considerably more milk than the front tits. So carrying that analogy to the value of Murphy, he is considerably more valuable than others.

Now, that being said, there is a disparaging saying about "sucking hind tit", which relates to the natural impact of cows (and other four legged animals) doing what they do, including (particularly cows) dropping tremendous loads of frequently soft crap from about 4 foot elevations, along with giant cascading waterfalls of urine, often at the same time. These mixtures generally bounce and splash off their legs if the are walking and coat their tails and the back portion of their udders more so than the front portions. In addition to the hind tits being more encumbered by the legs of the animal, "sucking hind tit" is generally less desirable than sucking front tit; but that relates to the feeding order of those sucking tits and does not refer to the values of the tits themselves.

[woodbuck27]

Actually, unless things have changed dramatically since I grew up on a dairy farm, the title to this thread actually points out the irrational analysis and confusion that fans put into evaluations of front office personnel.

Hind tits on a cow in my days on the farm were anything but worthless. In fact, the hind tits generally produced considerably more milk than the front tits. So carrying that analogy to the value of Murphy, he is considerably more valuable than others.

Now, that being said, there is a disparaging saying about "sucking hind tit", which relates to the natural impact of cows (and other four legged animals) doing what they do, including (particularly cows) dropping tremendous loads of frequently soft crap from about 4 foot elevations, along with giant cascading waterfalls of urine, often at the same time. These mixtures generally bounce and splash off their legs if the are walking and coat their tails and the back portion of their udders more so than the front portions. In addition to the hind tits being more encumbered by the legs of the animal, "sucking hind tit" is generally less desirable than sucking front tit; but that relates to the feeding order of those sucking tits and does not refer to the values of the tits themselves.

Thanks Patler for that informed Dissertation on Tits and Farming.

I was also raised part time early in my life and on both of my Grandparents Farms and your analysis is certainly accurate.

[Rastak]

Actually, unless things have changed dramatically since I grew up on a dairy farm, the title to this thread actually points out the irrational analysis and confusion that fans put into evaluations of front office personnel.

Hind tits on a cow in my days on the farm were anything but worthless. In fact, the hind tits generally produced considerably more milk than the front tits. So carrying that analogy to the value of Murphy, he is considerably more valuable than others.

Now, that being said, there is a disparaging saying about "sucking hind tit", which relates to the natural impact of cows (and other four legged animals) doing what they do, including (particularly cows) dropping tremendous loads of frequently soft crap from about 4 foot elevations, along with giant cascading waterfalls of urine, often at the same time. These mixtures generally bounce and splash off their legs if the are walking and coat their tails and the back portion of their udders more so than the front portions. In addition to the hind tits being more encumbered by the legs of the animal, "sucking hind tit" is generally less desirable than sucking front tit; but that relates to the feeding order of those sucking tits and does not refer to the values of the tits themselves.

Clearly Patler knows a ton about tits showing he's absolutely not a one trick pony, only knowing football. Well done!

[woodbuck27]

Clearly Patler knows a ton about tits showing he's absolutely not a one trick pony, only knowing football. Well done!

Patler:

Up on TITS !

[QBME]

Actually, unless things have changed dramatically since I grew up on a dairy farm, the title to this thread actually points out the irrational analysis and confusion that fans put into evaluations of front office personnel.

Hind tits on a cow in my days on the farm were anything but worthless. In fact, the hind tits generally produced considerably more milk than the front tits. So carrying that analogy to the value of Murphy, he is considerably more valuable than others.

Now, that being said, there is a disparaging saying about "sucking hind tit", which relates to the natural impact of cows (and other four legged animals) doing what they do, including (particularly cows) dropping tremendous loads of frequently soft crap from about 4 foot elevations, along with giant cascading waterfalls of urine, often at the same time. These mixtures generally bounce and splash off their legs if the are walking and coat their tails and the back portion of their udders more so than the front portions. In addition to the hind tits being more encumbered by the legs of the animal, "sucking hind tit" is generally less desirable than sucking front tit; but that relates to the feeding order of those sucking tits and does not refer to the values of the tits themselves.

Incredibly well explained. Also, props for not going after "irregardless".