Quote Originally Posted by Smidgeon View Post
Is the story different at the end of the year if the Pack loses to the Browns instead of beating them? Or is this game just another game?

Is this game pivotal because of how bad the Browns are?
That's the picture the GBPG/JSO/autoplay goddamn videos on every article/Gannett site is painting. They're acting like it will prove out their other clickbait on how the Packers without Rodgers are no better than the Browns.

It's really only pivotal because the Packers' chances of still making the playoffs go from 5% to 8% if they win or to 1% if they lose. It does nothing to validate the thesis they've been trying to advance, though a loss would almost certainly result in a lot more garbage getting pumped out of the Gannett sewer.