Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: The Catch Rule

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    1. This is the essential difference between baseball and football, not picayune rules. Is the ball in the glove before the runner hits the bag? What does 'in the glove' imply Simple - that the ball was in the glove and didn't come out. Not hard to see because six guys aren't piled on top blocking your view. It's the nature of the sports to be different in this way.
    This is true for catches versus foul balls.

    However, baseball doesn't use instant replay for balls and strikes. And balls and strikes suffer from some of the same problems as the catch rule:

    1. Is the black part of the strike zone?
    2. How much of the ball must cover the edge of the plate?
    3. Where, exactly, is the midpoint between your waist and your armpit?
    4. What about a crouching batter?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand View Post
    Catch: Your revised rule would result in a far higher rate of drops - any touching of the ground? But only when the receiver is 'going to the ground' right? Not certainly after the receiver had caught the ball, made a 'football move' and then went to the ground and had the nose of the ball touch the ground as he rolled before being touched? LOL, I don't think there are perfectly simple answers for some of these conundrums. Making rules understandable, calls easier to make and consistent is the best you can hope for.
    In my world, if the ball touches the ground at all during a catch is no catch. Once you secure the ball (tuck it, two hands, hold it over your head) if it touches the ground its a fumble.

    Bobble during catch, before secure, then touch ground? Incomplete.

    Bobble after a catch, after secure, then touch ground? Fumble.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  3. #23
    I would be fine with stick 'um and gloves.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  4. #24
    Oracle Rat HOFer Cheesehead Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ruling the Meadow!
    Posts
    10,785
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    I’ll second this, I tried on a pair of dicks in Green Bay 2 or 3 years ago and was shocked
    FIFY
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

  5. #25
    Moose Rat HOFer woodbuck27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,498
    Quote Originally Posted by pbmax View Post
    In my world, if the ball touches the ground at all during a catch is no catch. Once you secure the ball (tuck it, two hands, hold it over your head) if it touches the ground its a fumble.

    Bobble during catch, before secure, then touch ground? Incomplete.

    Bobble after a catch, after secure, then touch ground? Fumble.
    Yes this with the exception of considering the catch and 'reaching the ball' to the Goal Line.

    If after a catch the ball crosses the plane of the Goal Line it's a TD (not natta natta natta and the ground came into the play and caused a fumble).

    Call it 'The Einstein Rule'.

    “The definition of genius is taking the complex and making it simple.”

    ― Albert Einstein
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •