Vikings Week

[pbmax]

I don't understand your point. He doesn't need an injury settlement, "so he can get off IR and sign with the Packers again this year.". They can bring him back as one of the two allowed returns from IR.

Unwritten assumption was that they won’t want to use one IR return of two on a guy who just returns kicks.

But if they can use waivers as his own IR they would consider bringing him back.

Word came today that Cobb is the punt returner and I can’t believe they prefer that risk.

[mraynrand]

Unwritten assumption was that they won’t want to use one IR return of two on a guy who just returns kicks.

But if they can use waivers as his own IR they would consider bringing him back.

Word came today that Cobb is the punt returner and I can’t believe they prefer that risk.

Good post. I suspect Cobb, like the other night, will be doing mostly fair catches or watching balls (hopefully) bounce into the end zone.

[Patler]

Unwritten assumption was that they won’t want to use one IR return of two on a guy who just returns kicks.

But if they can use waivers as his own IR they would consider bringing him back.

Word came today that Cobb is the punt returner and I can’t believe they prefer that risk.

What I don't get is this, if they didn't want to "waste" an IR-return on him, why didn't they just carry him as a game day inactive, at least for a week or two? They are healthy enough to do that.

It looks to me that he is really #53 of the guys they want on their roster, and rather than carry him a few weeks they would rather use his spot to bring in others for what might amount to extended tryouts.

[pbmax]

What I don't get is this, if they didn't want to "waste" an IR-return on him, why didn't they just carry him as a game day inactive, at least for a week or two? They are healthy enough to do that.

It looks to me that he is really #53 of the guys they want on their roster, and rather than carry him a few weeks they would rather use his spot to bring in others for what might amount to extended tryouts.

I agree with the 2nd sentence. Though while he was possibly player #53, he had a starting job on ST at a key position. But as someone else stated he's also not quite Devin Hester so he is not a must retain. Especially since his hamstring did not survive two weeks of practice and one preseason game.

Its reasonable his recovery will extend a minimum of another 4 weeks as the Packers tended to rest more after a re-injury. So carrying him as inactive might last more than a month.

I think also he was the second casualty of the 8 WR final cutdown. It was clear the Packers weren't going to carry 8 for long. Kumerow went right to IR and Davis was #2, leaving them at a more reasonable 6. If Davis had survived the preseason game and practice to be the starting returner, I expect they make another WR move.

The big question is why sign a CB in his stead. That CB is not returner, and I haven't seen any good speculation about why that player or position.

[Joemailman]

I agree with the 2nd sentence. Though while he was possibly player #53, he had a starting job on ST at a key position. But as someone else stated he's also not quite Devin Hester so he is not a must retain. Especially since his hamstring did not survive two weeks of practice and one preseason game.

Its reasonable his recovery will extend a minimum of another 4 weeks as the Packers tended to rest more after a re-injury. So carrying him as inactive might last more than a month.

I think also he was the second casualty of the 8 WR final cutdown. It was clear the Packers weren't going to carry 8 for long. Kumerow went right to IR and Davis was #2, leaving them at a more reasonable 6. If Davis had survived the preseason game and practice to be the starting returner, I expect they make another WR move.

The big question is why sign a CB in his stead. That CB is not returner, and I haven't seen any good speculation about why that player or position.

House with 0 defensive snaps vs. Bears. Maybe his days are numbered? Someone has to go when Jones is activated.

[pbmax]

House with 0 defensive snaps vs. Bears. Maybe his days are numbered? Someone has to go when Jones is activated.

Weird to keep him as an insurance policy then let him go. I would think the new CB would go to the PS. It'd make more sense to let House go if Jones played corner or vice versa.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

House with 0 defensive snaps vs. Bears. Maybe his days are numbered? Someone has to go when Jones is activated.

House is playing for the minimum-wage. Cutting House is unnecessary. The guy ain't Neon Deion but he ain't an abomination, either. When injuries hit everyone and their baby mama's. you want an experienced vet of NFL wars like House over an undrafted sloth like Ladarious Fucking Gunter.