Results 1 to 20 of 631

Thread: Off-season 2023 Banjo

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    hahahahahaha If he ever read the shit in here, that chip would come back in a hurry.

    A generally good post, runpMc - at least in comparison to most of the hater crap from some in here.

    I guess it doesn't occur to any of those dumbasses that a large part of the reason for Rodgers' worse stats was a better run game? or lower quality and/or less experienced receivers? I bet some of ya'all haters were the same shitheads who used to whine that Rodgers was a "stat whore" when he was consistently throwing for 300 yards a game and 40+ TDs a season.
    You keep lumping everyone that disagrees with you together using labels like shit head and dumbasses. It just weakens your credibility.

    I never called Rodgers a stat whore. I have only ever wanted him to be successful. I have no agenda or desire to be proven right. I'm just sharing what I see and believe. Is it inconceivable to you that people raise questions about Rodgers because they are just reasonably concerned for the Packers?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    You keep lumping everyone that disagrees with you together using labels like shit head and dumbasses. It just weakens your credibility.

    I never called Rodgers a stat whore. I have only ever wanted him to be successful. I have no agenda or desire to be proven right. I'm just sharing what I see and believe. Is it inconceivable to you that people raise questions about Rodgers because they are just reasonably concerned for the Packers?
    This, and ThunderDans' post as well.
    Rodgers is on the decline.

    The Packers ran the ball 10 times more this year than last year, and that's over 17 games not 16, so you could argue they ran less. His mobility did decline: Rodgers scrambles/runs per game were at a career low, and when he did it was obvious he can't run like he did 5 years ago. All in all, I don't see how you could not see his efficiency and production declined. I also don't know why anyone would think a declining player would suddenly be rejuvenated and play like an MVP in their age 40 season. He declined across the board, not just in one area, which would be more indicative of an external circumstance.

    If you can back up your position with stats I might agree with you.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    You keep lumping everyone that disagrees with you together using labels like shit head and dumbasses. It just weakens your credibility.

    I never called Rodgers a stat whore. I have only ever wanted him to be successful. I have no agenda or desire to be proven right. I'm just sharing what I see and believe. Is it inconceivable to you that people raise questions about Rodgers because they are just reasonably concerned for the Packers?
    Well, sorry if the labels don't fit hahahahaha, but just read what some of these imbeciles say - this Thunderdan post and Cumby's above ....... that's about as stupid and shitheadish as you can get. Next year and beyond will tell the story - whether what they say proves to be idiocy either way, success with Rodgers or mediocrity without him. Maybe I'm gonna get proven wrong, but I really don't think so.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  4. #4
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,076
    Quote Originally Posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    Well, sorry if the labels don't fit hahahahaha, but just read what some of these imbeciles say - this Thunderdan post and Cumby's above ....... that's about as stupid and shitheadish as you can get. Next year and beyond will tell the story - whether what they say proves to be idiocy either way, success with Rodgers or mediocrity without him. Maybe I'm gonna get proven wrong, but I really don't think so.
    If I am a shithead, then that makes you a dumb shit!!

    I answered a simple question, if ARod and Love are going to play at the same level, why would you choose to pay $31.6 million instead of $3.9 million for the same production?

    That’s complete stupidity.

    The question wasn’t who will play better or who gives the Packers a better chance at winning, but your age addled mind apparently can pick that out anymore because it is blinded by you misguided homerism. Especially this year when we finished 8-9 and missed the playoffs.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderDan View Post
    If I am a shithead, then that makes you a dumb shit!!

    I answered a simple question, if ARod and Love are going to play at the same level, why would you choose to pay $31.6 million instead of $3.9 million for the same production?

    That’s complete stupidity.

    The question wasn’t who will play better or who gives the Packers a better chance at winning, but your age addled mind apparently can pick that out anymore because it is blinded by you misguided homerism. Especially this year when we finished 8-9 and missed the playoffs.
    they really need to ban computer use at nursing homes

    how can you have discussions with someone who doesn't even know what reality is?

  6. #6
    El Jardinero Rat HOFer MadtownPacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way beyond the border
    Posts
    14,191
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    they really need to ban computer use at nursing homes

    how can you have discussions with someone who doesn't even know what reality is?
    They let you post from the penal colony so not much difference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •