Who Will Aaron Rodgers Play For In 2023 (Or Will He Play)?

[texaspackerbacker]

You claim it's just logical, but don't know any more than anyone else here what Rodgers or the Packers organization are thinking.

Exactly! But unlike them (whoever them might be), what I spew is logical. Probably some in here think the same about the shit they post. I'll put my logic against theirs any day of the week. The media shitheads are completely different animals. I doubt they even pretend to be logical. They are merely interested in click bait and stirring up trouble. But you're correct, NONE of us or them actually know what Rodgers or the Packer brass are thinking. We'll only find out when things happen (or in a lot of this, do not happen).

[call_me_ishmael]

Oh snap. https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1633148006928195584

[RashanGary]

Oh snap. https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1633148006928195584

Saw that. Tex bout to have egg on his face.

[sharpe1027]

Exactly! But unlike them (whoever them might be), what I spew is logical. Probably some in here think the same about the shit they post. I'll put my logic against theirs any day of the week. The media shitheads are completely different animals. I doubt they even pretend to be logical. They are merely interested in click bait and stirring up trouble. But you're correct, NONE of us or them actually know what Rodgers or the Packer brass are thinking. We'll only find out when things happen (or in a lot of this, do not happen).

I see no difference. You're just like them.

[call_me_ishmael]

https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/...949315/video/1

So what happens if we decides to stay in GB? I find this unlikely. I do wonder if they'd welcome him back for two years and trade Love. I don't see any path for him back unless he commits to two years if not more.

[jklowan]

imho opinion there is no path back sorry Tex, GB had to give him permission to speak to the Jets. That alone should at least mean that the trade parameters have been discussed and met. Both clubs are waiting on Rogers to announce if he is back or retiring, should know by the middle of next week I bet.

[ThunderDan]

Exactly! But unlike them (whoever them might be), what I spew is logical. Probably some in here think the same about the shit they post. I'll put my logic against theirs any day of the week. The media shitheads are completely different animals. I doubt they even pretend to be logical. They are merely interested in click bait and stirring up trouble. But you're correct, NONE of us or them actually know what Rodgers or the Packer brass are thinking. We'll only find out when things happen (or in a lot of this, do not happen).

Except, if ARod does leave the Packers you have been spewing crap for 15 pages just like you say they do. But in this case, they would be right.

This feels like a Woody and BF croc shot melt down by Tex coming soon.

[texaspackerbacker]

You're assuming, Dan, and all logic says it simply ain't gonna happen way ya'all who love to swallow the media shit think it's gonna happen. I'm definitely on the record, and on the slim chance I am wrong, everyone of ya'all can feel free to pile on and say you told me so - because you damn well better believe, I will be doing exactly that when I am proven right.

The difference is, if I'm right, we have continued great times for 1, 2, 3 years and maybe beyond, while if ya'all are right, everybody who calls themselves Packer fans will suffer for the foreseeable future. And while that may mean something to the poor misguided good people in here, it means nothing to media shitheads, and most of them probably wish for it.

[texaspackerbacker]

I see no difference. You're just like them.

Uh ....... yeah, I don't know and they don't know. Isn't that what I just said?

[sharpe1027]

Uh ....... yeah, I don't know and they don't know. Isn't that what I just said?

You made absolute statements that it was a certainty he'd stay. Can't backtrack now.

[Fosco33]

I’d say 33% retire and if he comes back it’s probably 75% as a Packer. Which still is 50/50 overall.
I think the packers and jets will know if he’s coming back by 3/15 and we might not know where until 6/1 officially.

[Rastak]

"A contingent of Jets team officials, including owner Woody Johnson, general manager Joe Douglas, head coach Robert Saleh and offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett, are flying out Tuesday to meet in person with Rodgers, sources said. It's unclear whether the meeting will result in a trade, however."

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...rs-sources-say

[texaspackerbacker]

You made absolute statements that it was a certainty he'd stay. Can't backtrack now.

Did I? I think I said IMO or something like that, but either way, yeah, I'll stand by it. That glorious contract which so many haters hate so much hahahaha makes it pretty horrible for the team to trade him. It also makes it a downright HUGE amount for him to walk away from if he retires. Thus, hell no I ain't backtracking.

[NewsBruin]

Did I? I think I said IMO or something like that, but either way, yeah, I'll stand by it. That glorious contract which so many haters hate so much hahahaha makes it pretty horrible for the team to trade him. It also makes it a downright HUGE amount for him to walk away from if he retires. Thus, hell no I ain't backtracking.

Out of curiosity, what makes Rodgers' contract great and glorious and all the other adjectives? How is it beneficial to the Packers; how is it beneficial to Rodgers? What makes it so unique, compared to other contracts? Is the use of option bonuses and veteran minimum something you'd like to see more of?

[bobblehead]

I'm at peace, beca8use on one hand I saw AROD taking us to 11 wins and shitting on himself again in a second half playoff game to leave us all in turmoil again

Then I saw, Jordan Love develop and lead us to 8 wins but give us hope

And rather than get frustrated with either situation, then I watched porn because reality is we're not winning the Big Show either way next year.

But isn't it also reality that you are not having porn sex with hot Latin maids either?

[bobblehead]

You made absolute statements that it was a certainty he'd stay. Can't backtrack now.

Certainly he can. Happens everyday. In sports. In politics. For sure on internet chat boards. In 2 days Tex will be claiming that he has always told you ARod was heading to NY. If you try to quote him he will claim you lack context. Its the god damn american way!!

[bobblehead]

Did I? I think I said IMO or something like that, but either way, yeah, I'll stand by it. That glorious contract which so many haters hate so much hahahaha makes it pretty horrible for the team to trade him. It also makes it a downright HUGE amount for him to walk away from if he retires. Thus, hell no I ain't backtracking.

I rest my case.

[texaspackerbacker]

Out of curiosity, what makes Rodgers' contract great and glorious and all the other adjectives? How is it beneficial to the Packers; how is it beneficial to Rodgers? What makes it so unique, compared to other contracts? Is the use of option bonuses and veteran minimum something you'd like to see more of?

You actually would ask that? It is Great and Glorious because it effectively prevents his being traded and it strongly discourages his retiring. THAT benefits the Packers and all of us who want winning football for the next whatever number of years. "Option bonuses"? Are you talking about basically beating the cap by giving a big bonus and prorating it? Hell yeah I'm for that. Veteran minimum? How does that apply? Yeah, that's what you pay some players - it's not really something to be for or against.

[texaspackerbacker]

bobblehead, When did I EVER backtrack on ANYTHING? If I get accused of being stubborn, I'll plead guilty, but backtracking? No Way.

[bobblehead]

bobblehead, When did I EVER backtrack on ANYTHING? If I get accused of being stubborn, I'll plead guilty, but backtracking? No Way.

If you can't admit that you allowed ZERO possibility for Rodgers being traded through like 12 pages then you are backtracking.