Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 81

Thread: More Banjo - Packers vs Saints

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by MadtownPacker View Post
    Despite several WRs trying their best at times Love completed 0 eyerolls all game.
    how many drops were there? was anyone counting?

    it seemed like at least 10 times our guys hand their hands on the ball and didn't come down with it

    i'm sure "official stats", will say some bullshit like 2. but it was a lot today

  2. #2
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    I didn’t post in the game day thread. I was keeping defensive alignment snaps in the first half and quit at halftime.

    If my numbers are right, we had 31 plays in defense not counting punts and FG tries.

    We ran our base D, 3-4 with 3 big fatties, on 9 plays or around 30% of the time. I think this is more than usual. The Saints only had two big runs in the first half. Both were against our base D. Both plays the OLB crashed down and the Saints were able to get the edge.

    It was hard to tell nickel from dime because the camera is on the line at the snap. I had 12 plays at least in nickel and the other 10 I wasn’t sure if dime or nickel.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  3. #3
    Jumbo Rat HOFer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    14,066
    I am shocked that the Saints went so pass heavy in the 2nd half. Even running ineffectively burns clock.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

  4. #4
    hahahahaha not eyerolls, but he did give them a "look" several times - well deserved look.

    Don't we have "studs and duds" threads anymore?

    Before I get into the plethora of studs and maybe a few part time duds for the team, I'll nominate some media bastard idiot I read who suggested the Packers should trade for some veteran WR hahahaha. Those shit-eating fools/shit-spewing fools don't know the Packers a tenth as well as just about everybody in here.

    Fulltime Studs: Love (obviously) damn near all of the time. Rashan Gary playing like a superstar.

    Most of the time Studs: Doubs, Musgrave, Douglas, Nixon, Rudy Ford, Savage, Wicks

    Studs about half the time: Reed, Clark, the right side of the O Line, LaFleur's playcalling

    More Dud than Stud but not enough to lose the game: Whelan, the left side of the O Line, Barry's D (better than it usually is, though), Vilma commentating

    Lesser Lights who showed up when needed today, most of the time anyway: Valentine and Ballentine, McDuffie, Toure, the back up RBs
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  5. #5
    Senior Rat All-Pro QBME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    The Flatland
    Posts
    1,234
    Wait, wait…
    I’m just a semi lurker but it seems to me the posts are all so true without bullshit
    I could be wrong..

  6. #6
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,236
    Love was annoyed after the interception. Reed ran the wrong route, I’m fairly certain. He lead the safety right to Doubs. By the time the ball got there, Reed was 5 yards away from Doubs. Of course Love was surprised the damn safety made it over there. I’m sure the play design wasn’t to run two guys to the same spot. If reed ran the correct route, I’m sure Love knew the safety had a much different responsibility and wouldn’t have been able to drift so quickly and confidently to the spot.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  7. #7
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,614
    I can't wait for studs/duds.

    Stud: Gutes and MiLF. We had the ENTIRE OFFENSE on rookie contracts today and Watson out as well. Still put 18 on a very stingy D. I can't stress enough how that just never happens.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  8. #8
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,236
    I don’t know what the defense was on that pick or exactly what Love saw, but I’m guessing Love peaked his read and knew they had to be in a certain defense. Once he knew what defense they were in, if Reed ran the right route I’m assuming he knew the safety couldn’t make it over there. I don’t know the exact process, but I know two receivers over there was not in the plan.

    I’m sure Love can peak the safety next time instead of assuming his guy is going to run the right route.

    That interception is partly on Love, but I don’t think it’s as bad as it looked. He looked in command and under control the entire game. That was not a mitchel turdbiscuit type confusion play.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  9. #9
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,236
    Watson and Musgrave are such a sick pair of speed demons. Love looks so in command of the game. It’s going to be real interesting to see what happens when he gets his crew back.

    I saw one pass pro from Musgrave that was just perfect. I really can’t believe how quickly this kid is catching on. He might be really special.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  10. #10
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,236
    I’m becoming a big fan of Musgrave. There was a crosser or some sort of out route he caught where he was just gliding to the sideline. Love threw it behind 88, but the catch was still made. It’s really hard for defenders to make plays on the ball when the guy their chasing is that damn fast. They’re in that mode where they’re just running as fast as they possibly can and can’t get to looking for the ball. And he seems to have really really really reliable hands. He might stumble a little because he’s so damn tall and lanky, so he’s not perfect. But he does a couple of things (run extremely fast and catch the damn ball) that are going to be very effective.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    I’m becoming a big fan of Musgrave. There was a crosser or some sort of out route he caught where he was just gliding to the sideline. Love threw it behind 88, but the catch was still made. It’s really hard for defenders to make plays on the ball when the guy their chasing is that damn fast. They’re in that mode where they’re just running as fast as they possibly can and can’t get to looking for the ball. And he seems to have really really really reliable hands. He might stumble a little because he’s so damn tall and lanky, so he’s not perfect. But he does a couple of things (run extremely fast and catch the damn ball) that are going to be very effective.
    he still can't stay on his feet after making a catch, but the guy really seems able to get open at will

    could end up being a really good pick

  12. #12
    Love is (somewhat surprisingly) making good reads and decisions. He's got a strong arm. If there's a criticism, he's not been super accurate.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    Love is (somewhat surprisingly) making good reads and decisions. He's got a strong arm. If there's a criticism, he's not been super accurate.
    Watching Kurt Warner's breakdowns, Love was consistently making good reads and decisions, so it isn't too much of a surprise. The accuracy needs work, but when the offense was 'play fast and chuck it', he stepped up and made a lot of plays downfield. Hopefully things will keep improving and he will get his weapons back. A 50% completion rate won't cut it very often.
    Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by MadScientist View Post
    Watching Kurt Warner's breakdowns, Love was consistently making good reads and decisions, so it isn't too much of a surprise. The accuracy needs work, but when the offense was 'play fast and chuck it', he stepped up and made a lot of plays downfield. Hopefully things will keep improving and he will get his weapons back. A 50% completion rate won't cut it very often.
    Preseason isn't a great indicator though.

  15. #15
    CutlerquitRat HOFer
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Woodbury Mn
    Posts
    7,711
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpe1027 View Post
    Love is (somewhat surprisingly) making good reads and decisions. He's got a strong arm. If there's a criticism, he's not been super accurate.
    Agreed 100% I don't know if he is missing throws, reads or his WRs are missing them but he seems to at least making the correct reads.
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

  16. #16
    El Jardinero Rat HOFer MadtownPacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way beyond the border
    Posts
    14,171
    Blog Entries
    4
    RG- Musgrave is the Dirty White boy TE you have been yearning for since you fell in love with Kittle. He needs to get some red zone shots.

  17. #17
    Senior Rat All-Pro QBME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    The Flatland
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by MadtownPacker View Post
    RG- Musgrave is the Dirty White boy TE you have been yearning for since you fell in love with Kittle. He needs to get some red zone shots.
    I would bring up Mark Chumura who definitely was attacked to the red zone shots

  18. #18
    Creepy Rat HOFer SkinBasket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Licking, Taco
    Posts
    14,427
    I know all you LGBTQIA’s love Love, but he has no presence, no command, no balls. I’m still waiting for him to strain his sphincter so the Clifford era can officially begin. You all can complain about drops, but chocolate starfish still can’t hit a fucking wide open target downfield when it counts. If he could, we wouldn’t have been put in the downward dog position from the get go. He’s had years to not look like a 1st or 2nd year fuckup, but that’s what we got right now.
    "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

  19. #19
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,692
    Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap 💰
    @KenIngalls

    The 2023 Salary Cap is $224.8M.

    Today the Green Bay Packers played & won a football game with $118.5M (53%) of cap space unavailable on the field.

    Dead: $59.34M
    PUP: $3.25M
    IR: $1.03M
    Bakh: $21.34M
    Jaire: $10.76M
    Jones: $8.20M
    Jenkins: $6.97M
    Campbell: $5.53M
    Watson: $2.10M
    Last edited by Joemailman; 09-24-2023 at 08:38 PM.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    Ken Ingalls - Packers Cap ������
    @KenIngalls

    The 2023 Salary Cap is $224.8M.

    Today the Green Bay Packers played & won a football game with $118.5M (53%) of cap space unavailable on the field.

    Dead: $59.34M
    PUP: $3.25M
    IR: $1.03M
    Bakh: $21.34M
    Jaire: $10.76M
    Jones: $8.20M
    Jenkins: $6.97M
    Campbell: $5.53M
    Watson: $2.10M
    LOL Yikes. Yeah, I've seen some tweets to this effect re: GB and their cap spending vs. player availability. Only having 47% of your cap spending playing on a Sunday is not good, and certainly not sustainable for winning games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •