View Poll Results: Predict the new money on Jordan Love’s new deal

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • 3yr 30-35M per

    0 0%
  • 3yr 35-40M per

    0 0%
  • 3yr 40-45M per

    1 5.88%
  • 3yr 45M+ per

    0 0%
  • 4yr 30-35M per

    1 5.88%
  • 4yr 35-40M per

    1 5.88%
  • 4yr 40-45M per

    4 23.53%
  • 4yr 45M+ per

    3 17.65%
  • 5+ 30-35M per

    1 5.88%
  • 5+ 35-40M per

    0 0%
  • 5+ 40-45M per

    3 17.65%
  • 5+ 45+M per

    3 17.65%
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Thread: Predict the new money on Jordan Love’s new deal

  1. #1
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,198

    Predict the new money on Jordan Love’s new deal

    He’s got a year left on his current deal, so whatever he signs for, this last year will average in and it will be slightly more friendly. But just new money, what’s he going to get?
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  2. #2
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,537
    I went big. It will be too much, but its what the market bears.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  3. #3
    Rider Rat HOFer Upnorth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    4,976
    I would love to see a longer term high incentive contract.

    I voted based on hope.

    I bet it will be in that 3 year 38 to 42 mill range
    All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

    George Orwell

  4. #4
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,198
    Twitter saying it’s gonna be 50 per in new money. Seems a little high to me.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  5. #5
    We’ll see if Love cares about short term cash OR rings and fame.

  6. #6
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,631
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    Twitter saying it’s gonna be 50 per in new money. Seems a little high to me.
    And Twitter is never wrong. I said 40-45. We'll see. 50 per year would put him at #5 right now. 45 at #8. 40 at #10. 50 per on an extension can't be ruled out since he's set to make less than 10 in 2024.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  7. #7
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,198
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    And Twitter is never wrong. I said 40-45. We'll see. 50 per year would put him at #5 right now. 45 at #8. 40 at #10. 50 per on an extension can't be ruled out since he's set to make less than 10 in 2024.
    I said 40-45 too. Didn’t realize 50 was #5. Damn. They have the last year of his deal 10M. And then two years of franchise tags (40 per) So they already have him on a 3 year 90 deal, practically speaking. That puts him at a disadvantage in negotiations and motivates his side to want to get a deal done.

    50 is fair…. With the way the leverage is in the teams favor, 42.5 seems doable….. But there is the matter of being disrespectful… 47.5M per in new money is my new guess.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  8. #8
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,198
    4 years 47.5M per year in new money
    Add in his one year 10M existing deal

    That brings us to 5 years, 200M. A nice even number. And it’s that magic number where 200M really feels substantial. We can stop the discussion. This is the contract. Write it down in pen because it’s not changing.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  9. #9
    I want to see him signed long term - as many as 8 or 10 years for more - with a healthy bonus and a strongly backloaded contract that on paper is way up there - $40-50 million per season on average, maybe even more. On the slim chance (IMO) that he turns to shit, this is the NFL, not MLB - they could always cut him before the backloaded part. And if he trends upward from very good now to great in the future, which I see as likely, then we have him signed for the prime of his career.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  10. #10
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,631
    Neither side would likely want to do an 8-10 year deal unless the numbers were really in their favor. Reason being is the uncertainty of what the market for a top QB will be that far into the future.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  11. #11
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,647
    Blog Entries
    2
    Keep in mind his agent is the same as Danny Dimes. NO WAY it's less than the 4 year 160MIL he signed.

    I think it's going to in the 45 to 50 range; maybe we REDO his deal for next year and he gives us a bargain to it averages the 40-45 range
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  12. #12
    That's why it would be good for the team - it certainly isn't gonna go down over time. I didn't say I predicted it, I said I WANTED 8 or 10 or more years. The team will likely be pushing for as long as possible. Love and his agent probably won't want quite that much.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  13. #13
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,647
    Blog Entries
    2
    I think it's 4; it gives GB time and Love time to get a bigger deal if he excels. Keep him hungry
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  14. #14
    i'll put this here

    i got this idea off of some podcast yesterday

    IF, lefleur doesn't shit the bed by sticking with his good buddy at DC instead had hired an even average DC, we are probably looking at a 10-12 win team that is for sure a solid playoff team

    in his first year as a starter with targets made up of nothing but rookies and 2nd year guys (one who seems to be always injured), an o-line that is OK at best, and a top weapon RB who has missed about half the year. Love has put up numbers just as good as anyone else

    the question is. if we had a competent defense (and not one of the worst in the NFL) and were making a solid playoff run, would jordan love, in his first year starting, actually be in the running for the MVP?

    i think yes. and it blows my mind

  15. #15
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,537
    Red, I would argue that if we squeak into the playoffs Love WILL get MVP votes. There was an article on it from one of the packer sites and his numbers are comparable to the contenders. Let me look it up quick.

    https://lombardiave.com/posts/green-...s-01hjj33stq5k

    Love: 3,587 passing yards
    27 passing touchdowns
    11 interceptions
    91.8 passer rating
    3 rushing touchdowns

    Brock Purdy: 4,050 yards, 29 TDs, 11 INTs, 112.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs
    Jalen Hurts: 3,636 yards, 20 TDs, 13 INTs, 89.6 rating, 14 rushing TDs
    Lamar Jackson: 3,357 yards, 19 TDs, 7 INTs, 97.2 rating, 5 rushing TDs
    Patrick Mahomes: 3,938 yards, 26 TDs, 14 INTs, 91.7 rating
    Josh Allen: 3,778 yards, 27 TDs, 15 INTs, 93.7 rating, 13 rushing TDs
    Tua Tagovailoa: 4,214 yards, 26 TDs, 10 INTs, 105.5 rating
    Dak Prescott: 3,892 yards, 30 TDs, 7 INTs, 104.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs

    If you factor in what he is working with, he deserves to be in the conversation. Now I'm speculating, but I bet if you looked at late season results he is better than most of that list. I think he only has one pick in the last 5 games.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bobblehead View Post
    Red, I would argue that if we squeak into the playoffs Love WILL get MVP votes. There was an article on it from one of the packer sites and his numbers are comparable to the contenders. Let me look it up quick.

    https://lombardiave.com/posts/green-...s-01hjj33stq5k

    Love: 3,587 passing yards
    27 passing touchdowns
    11 interceptions
    91.8 passer rating
    3 rushing touchdowns

    Brock Purdy: 4,050 yards, 29 TDs, 11 INTs, 112.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs
    Jalen Hurts: 3,636 yards, 20 TDs, 13 INTs, 89.6 rating, 14 rushing TDs
    Lamar Jackson: 3,357 yards, 19 TDs, 7 INTs, 97.2 rating, 5 rushing TDs
    Patrick Mahomes: 3,938 yards, 26 TDs, 14 INTs, 91.7 rating
    Josh Allen: 3,778 yards, 27 TDs, 15 INTs, 93.7 rating, 13 rushing TDs
    Tua Tagovailoa: 4,214 yards, 26 TDs, 10 INTs, 105.5 rating
    Dak Prescott: 3,892 yards, 30 TDs, 7 INTs, 104.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs

    If you factor in what he is working with, he deserves to be in the conversation. Now I'm speculating, but I bet if you looked at late season results he is better than most of that list. I think he only has one pick in the last 5 games.
    i think you're right

    thanks for posting everyones stats, i was just looking at them but was too lazy to copy and paste them all

    he's right in there with all those guys

  17. #17
    I think you're delusional Red to think they're be a 10 to 12 win team with a competent DC. They just don't have a lot of talent on the team, and the talent they do have has been hurt (Bak, Alexander, RB)

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
    I think you're delusional Red to think they're be a 10 to 12 win team with a competent DC. They just don't have a lot of talent on the team, and the talent they do have has been hurt (Bak, Alexander, RB)
    delusional?

    we are 7-9 right now. the defense lost the games against the falcons, giants and bucs (at the least)

    if the D make one fucking play in each of those games, we are 10-6 with 2 winnable games to go

    WITH all those injuries

  19. #19
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    32,647
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    delusional?

    we are 7-9 right now. the defense lost the games against the falcons, giants and bucs (at the least)

    if the D make one fucking play in each of those games, we are 10-6 with 2 winnable games to go

    WITH all those injuries


    that goes both ways

    We got lucky plenty this year. WE needed Derrick Carr to get injured and their solid kicker to muff a game winning field goal just a bit longer then an extra point. With Stafford we don't beat the Rams. We've had plenty of breaks this year as well.

    I want Barry gone...like LAST YEAR, but our defense has problems all around it. It's not just Barry
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  20. #20
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,537
    This team should have a ton of organic growth on offense. That should improve the record alone.

    On D, a new Coordinator definitely changes the equation.

    Lucky, unlucky, you tend to be what your record says you are. The packers right now are brutally young and lost games because they are learning. I would hope injury luck improves next year. I'll say it again. We have been running out a fleet of pass catchers in their first 2 years and after injury, none of them have been picked in the first 2 rounds. Show me one other team that does that? Hell, when we were trotting out Adams and a bunch of stiffs everyone here was crying that Gutes didn't give Rodgers ANYTHING to work with (cuz I guess Adams sucks). Love is dropping 30 with Bo Melton and company....all the while with a D that can't get off the field.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •