View Poll Results: Which WR most closely develops, into our #1 WR in GREEN BAY

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • WATSON

    2 13.33%
  • WICKS

    7 46.67%
  • REED

    6 40.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: WHO DEVELOPS INTO the NUMBER ONE WIDE RECEIVER in GB ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Jardinero Rat HOFer MadtownPacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way beyond the border
    Posts
    14,185
    Blog Entries
    4
    This a ridiculous poll. It’s obvious it’s going to be a rookie WR from next year. The one the Rodgers pick is used on.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadtownPacker View Post
    This a ridiculous poll. It’s obvious it’s going to be a rookie WR from next year. The one the Rodgers pick is used on.
    Hahahahahahaha.

  3. #3
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    I really like Reed. Wicks too though. And Watson. It’s a toss up. I think Reed is the most sure bet.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  4. #4
    Does this sound right?

    Reed is most likely to get lots of touches and make plays after the catch.

    Wicks is more likey to be they guy to fight for the 50-50 ball.

    Watson is more likely to beat everyone deep and go up and get a short TD pass jump ball.

    Pick which one is your #1, but you want them all on the field.

  5. #5
    because we are so deep at WR, do we trade one or 2 away, and when? (probably not this offseason)

  6. #6
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Quote Originally Posted by red View Post
    because we are so deep at WR, do we trade one or 2 away, and when? (probably not this offseason)
    Probably, if they all go the way they’re going. 2nd round pick is better than a 3rd compensatory.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  7. #7
    Could be a 1A, 1B between Reed and Wicks. I lean more toward Wicks, because he's been better against man coverage, but they've both been good and things like that can change a lot year-to-year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •